Annals of Surgery

Top Research Topics at Annals of Surgery?

The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Surgery, Internal medicine, General surgery, MEDLINE and Gastroenterology. While Surgery is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Anesthesia and Radiology. Annals of Surgery addresses concerns in Internal medicine which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Endocrinology, Oncology and Cardiology.

The studies tackled, which mainly focus on General surgery, apply to Text mining as well.

• Surgery (38.89%)
• Internal medicine (18.63%)
• General surgery (13.21%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. (17066 citations)
• The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. (5101 citations)
• Clinical Score for Predicting Recurrence After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Analysis of 1001 Consecutive Cases (2906 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Annals of Surgery:

The journal papers focus on Surgery, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Survival rate and Prospective cohort study. The Surgery research tackled in the published articles is interrelated with General surgery which concerns subjects like MEDLINE. While work presented in the published papers provide substantial information on Internal medicine, it also covers topics in Endocrinology, Oncology and Cardiology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Diabetes mellitus

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Annals of Surgery was organized to reinforce research efforts on MEDLINE, Surgery, Internal medicine, General surgery and Randomized controlled trial. The tackled MEDLINE research is interrelated with Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which concerns subjects like Pandemic. The work on Surgery addressed in it expands to the thematically related Cohort.

Internal medicine research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Gastroenterology and Oncology. Most of the Randomized controlled trial studies addressed also intersect with Meta-analysis. It features Confidence interval research that overlaps with concepts in Odds ratio.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Factors Predicting Response, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Borderline/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. (106 citations)
• Frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: results from the UK observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) study (56 citations)
• Prehospital Blood Product and Crystalloid Resuscitation in the Severely Injured Patient: A Secondary Analysis of the Prehospital Air Medical Plasma Trial. (55 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Annals of Surgery (based on the number of publications) are:

• Keith D. Lillemoe (161 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 14 less than at the previous edition,
• Murray F. Brennan (127 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Lewis S. Pilcher (115 papers) absent at the last edition,
• John L. Cameron (109 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• James P. Warbasse (107 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Annals of Surgery (based on the number of publications) are:

• Harvard University (606 papers) published 66 papers at the last edition, 28 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Michigan (367 papers) published 50 papers at the last edition, 7 less than at the previous edition,
• Johns Hopkins University (326 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 6 less than at the previous edition,
• Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (248 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 11 less than at the previous edition,
• Duke University (237 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 18.32% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 29.15% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.51% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.35% of all publications and 44.99% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Opportunities and Licensing Requirements in the Field of Surgery

For those interested in pursuing a career in the field of Surgery and allied sub-disciplines, it's essential to understand the various career tracks that might be available. Exploring different career options in the healthcare sector is crucial for existing professionals seeking advancement, as well as students who are contemplating establishing a career in this domain.

Apart from the opportunities in the areas of research and academics, several roles in a clinical setting might demand different skill sets. These can range from surgeons (general, specialized), radiologists, anesthetists, to supportive roles in nursing and paramedic staff. Each of these career tracks may have its individual requirements in terms of training, specialization, experience, licensing, and ongoing professional development.

For instance, nursing staff planning to specialize in surgery have to meet both educational and licensure requisites. These might vary from state to state; however, they typically include completing a nursing program (diploma, associate’s, or bachelor’s degree), passing the NCLEX-RN, gaining clinical experience, and fulfilling additional requirements for being licensed in the desired specialty. For detailed information regarding the licensure requirements, specifically for Minnesota, you can visit the minnesota nursing license requirements board of nursing requirements.

As the healthcare industry continues to evolve and advance, aspirants and professionals in these fields should stay updated with the latest research trends and developments. Consider subscribing to specialty forums and esteemed journals, such as the Annals of Surgery, to stay abreast of the newest information and career trends in your chosen field.