The 34th Chinese Control and Decision Conference 2022 (CCDC)

The conference ranking presented on this page offers a comprehensive listing of scientific conferences within the field of Engineering and Technology. This ranking has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, which has been recognized since 2014 as a leading authority in providing trusted data and analytics on scientific contributions across all major domains, including Engineering and Technology.

The ranking is founded upon a proprietary bibliometric score developed by Research.com. The position of each conference is determined by an evaluation of the estimated h-index alongside the number of distinguished scientists who have participated in the conference over the most recent three-year period. The Impact Score values featured in this ranking were collected on 2024-11-27 to ensure the utmost accuracy and relevancy.

The rigorous ranking process involved detailed analysis and scrutiny of more than 2,262 conferences, which were selected following an extensive examination of over 26,934 scientific documents authored in the last three years. These documents represent the collective work of 9,385 highly regarded and established scientists specializing in Engineering and Technology.

By leveraging a robust, transparent, and data-driven methodology, the ranking underscores the depth of research and the complex analytical procedures employed by subject matter experts to ensure credibility and reliability. For those seeking an in-depth understanding of the calculation procedures and underlying criteria, a comprehensive explanation is available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Chinese Control and Decision Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• Yuanwei Jing (85 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• Guang-Hong Yang (58 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Dingwei Wang (38 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Qingling Zhang (37 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Jiafu Tang (36 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Chinese Control and Decision Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• Northeastern University (China) (1213 papers) published 74 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition,
• Northeastern University (380 papers) published 31 papers at the last edition, 8 less than at the previous edition,
• Beijing Institute of Technology (256 papers) published 19 papers at the last edition, 16 less than at the previous edition,
• Harbin Institute of Technology (234 papers) published 20 papers at the last edition, 9 less than at the previous edition,
• Beihang University (230 papers) published 22 papers at the last edition, 20 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2018 edition, 10.49% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.25% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 11.90% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.34% of all publications and 41.51% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.