2027 DHA Applied Projects vs Routine Workplace Quality Improvement

Imed Bouchrika, PhD

by Imed Bouchrika, PhD

Co-Founder and Chief Data Scientist

What distinguishes a DHA applied project from routine workplace quality improvement?

The clearest difference is accountability for the work. Routine QI is accountable to an organization's operational goals. A DHA applied project is accountable to those goals and to a doctoral program's standards for framing a problem, using evidence, evaluating results, and communicating what was learned. Programs may call the final work a capstone, doctoral project, or dissertation in practice; their requirements are not interchangeable.

This comparison helps determine whether an existing initiative is suitable for doctoral study.

DimensionRoutine workplace QIDHA applied project
Starting pointA local performance problemA practice problem that also supports doctoral inquiry
Primary audienceOperational leaders and frontline teamsOrganizational stakeholders and academic reviewers
EvidenceEnough measurement to guide local decisionsA justified approach, documented data and analysis, and stated limitations
DeliverableA changed process and performance reportA formal project report or other program-approved scholarly product

A project about patient records may also require information-management expertise. Comparing administration versus health records management education can clarify which skills the project team needs.

What are the main goals and outcomes of a DHA applied project?

A DHA applied project generally aims to address a meaningful healthcare administration problem while demonstrating that the student can connect leadership decisions to evidence. A useful outcome may be an implemented change, a carefully evaluated pilot, or a feasible recommendation when implementation is outside the student's control. A positive performance result is valuable, but a credible account of what did not work can also be academically and operationally useful.

For example, a student might examine delayed specialty referrals, introduce a revised handoff process, and evaluate whether delays changed. The doctoral contribution lies not merely in holding meetings or launching the process, but in explaining the problem, selecting measures, assessing results, and identifying limits such as staffing changes or incomplete data.

Students who mainly want preparation for healthcare management roles, rather than a doctoral project, should also review graduate options leading to an MHA. The more appropriate degree depends on the work they want to do, not simply the highest credential available.

How does routine workplace quality improvement work in healthcare organizations?

Routine QI identifies a performance gap, tests a change, checks whether a useful measure moves, and adjusts or maintains the process. A team might track appointment wait times while testing a scheduling change. Its work is shaped by available staff time, patient safety, reporting obligations, and the need to keep care running - not by an academic calendar.

Operational teams should define a measure before changing a process, establish a baseline where possible, and watch for unintended effects. Faster appointments, for instance, are less persuasive if missed visits or staff workload worsen. Teams also need to decide who owns the process after a pilot ends.

When an initiative relies on coded clinical information or record workflows, data definitions and staff capabilities become central. Guidance on HIM degree selection and CAHIIM accreditation may help leaders understand the distinct preparation of health information professionals; that accreditation should not be assumed to apply to a DHA.

How can students evaluate DHA accreditation, certifications, and program quality?

First, verify the university's current institutional accreditation through its accreditor and the U.S. Department of Education's recognition information. Then ask whether any program-specific accreditation is claimed and whether it actually covers the DHA. Accreditation of another degree at the same school does not automatically extend to the doctorate; professional certifications in QI or project management are separate credentials, not substitutes for program accreditation.

Quality is also visible in project support. Ask for the required final-project format, advisor assignment process, ethics-review procedures, access to research resources, and rules for changing sites or extending enrollment. When weighing accelerated options, use guidance on doctoral degree formats and time requirements in healthcare administration to distinguish a feasible schedule from one that leaves too little room for a credible project.

Other Things You Should Know About Healthcare Administration

Can I use a project from my current job as my DHA project?

Often, but obtain your program's approval and your employer's permission first. Confirm that the scope, data access, and deliverable meet doctoral requirements.

Must a DHA project produce a statistically significant improvement?

Not necessarily. Requirements vary, but a well-designed evaluation and honest explanation of inconclusive or unfavorable results may be more valuable than an unsupported success claim.

Who owns the data and final report from a workplace-based project?

That depends on university policies and the site agreement. Clarify data access, confidentiality, publication, and ownership before starting.

Can a project continue after the student graduates?

Yes, if the organization takes responsibility for it. A handoff plan identifying process owners and ongoing measures makes continued use more likely.