World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 44 16651 4134 63 11383

Scott G. Gaynor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott G. Gaynor between 1993 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott G. Gaynor published across 20 years, from 1993 to 2012, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2000. 4 of the 75 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2000. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications
1993 2012

75 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott G. Gaynor: publications per year, 1993 to 2012
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 3
1995 5
1996 5
1997 9
1998 14
1999 5
2000 15
2001 0
2002 2
2003 5
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 1
2009 4
2010 0
2011 0
2012 4
Total 75
Download as CSV

Scott G. Gaynor publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott G. Gaynor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 63 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66 63
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott G. Gaynor D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott G. Gaynor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808 44
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott G. Gaynor is affiliated with Dow Chemical in the United States. Their professional work is conducted within this primary affiliation.

There is no publicly available information regarding Scott G. Gaynor's recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, main topics of work, or awards won. This limits detailed insight into the specific areas of research or scientific contributions.

The absence of listed recent papers means there is no detailed record of specific research topics or publication history, including titles, years, or venues associated with Scott G. Gaynor. Similarly, there is no information on frequent co-authors or collaboration networks that could indicate research partnerships or interdisciplinary work.

Without data on publication venues or book publications, it is not possible to identify the primary platforms or publishers where they may have disseminated research findings.

Details on main fields, subfields, and main topics of study are also not provided. Therefore, the specific scientific domains or thematic concentrations guiding their research activities remain unspecified.

Lastly, there is no record of awards or honors, which could otherwise highlight recognition within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • The Synthesis of Densely Grafted Copolymers by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

    Kathryn L. Beers;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Sergei S. Sheiko

  • Synthesis of branched and hyperbranched polystyrenes

    Scott G. Gaynor;and Shane Edelman;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization of Acrylates at Ambient Temperature

    Jianhui Xia;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Optimization of atom transfer radical polymerization using Cu(I)/ tris(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)amine as a catalyst

    Jerome Queffelec;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Controlled Radical Polymerizations: The Use of Alkyl Iodides in Degenerative Transfer

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Scott Gaynor;Jin-Shan Wang

  • Preparation of hyperbranched polyacrylates by atom transfer radical polymerization. 1. Acrylic AB* monomers in living radical polymerizations

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Scott G. Gaynor;and Anthony Kulfan;Matthew Podwika

  • Zerovalent Metals in Controlled/“Living” Radical Polymerization

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Simion Coca;Scott G. Gaynor;Mingli Wei

  • Atom transfer radical polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate

    Kathryn L. Beers;Sohyun Boo;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Novel (co)polymers

    Matyjaszewski Krzysztof;Coca Simion;Gaynor Scott G;Nakagawa Yoshiki

  • Improved processes based on atom (or group) transfer radical polymerization and novel (co)polymers having useful structures and properties

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Simion Coca;Scott G. Gaynor;Dorota Greszta

  • Synthesis of Well-Defined Polyacrylonitrile by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Seong Mu Jo;Hyun-Jong Paik;Scott G. Gaynor

  • Controlled Radical Polymerization by Degenerative Transfer - Effect of the Structure of the Transfer Agent

    Scott G. Gaynor;Jin-Shan Wang;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Simple and Efficient Synthesis of Various Alkoxyamines for Stable Free Radical Polymerization

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Brian E. Woodworth;Xuan Zhang;Scott G. Gaynor

  • Preparation of Hyperbranched Polyacrylates by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. 2. Kinetics and Mechanism of Chain Growth for the Self-Condensing Vinyl Polymerization of 2-((2-Bromopropionyl)oxy)ethyl Acrylate

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Scott G. Gaynor;Axel H. E. Müller

  • Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

    Jianhui Xia;Terri Johnson;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Synthesis of well‐defined azido and amino end‐functionalized polystyrene by atom transfer radical polymerization

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Yoshiki Nakagawa;Scott G. Gaynor

  • Halide Anions as Ligands in Iron-Mediated Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

    Mircea Teodorescu;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Synthesis of Amphiphilic Block Copolymers by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP)

    Andreas Mühlebach;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Preparation of Hyperbranched Polyacrylates by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. 3. Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Self-Condensing Vinyl Polymerization of 2-((2-Bromopropionyl)oxy)ethyl Acrylate

    Krzysztof Matyjaszewski;Scott G. Gaynor

  • Emulsion Polymerization of n-Butyl Methacrylate by Reverse Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization

    Jian Qiu;Scott G. Gaynor;Krzysztof Matyjaszewski

  • Controlled Radical Polymerization

    Scott Gaynor;Dorota Greszta;Daniela Mardare;Mircea Teodorescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Krzysztof Matyjaszewski
Krzysztof Matyjaszewski Carnegie Mellon University
Kathryn L. Beers
Kathryn L. Beers National Institute of Standards and Technology
Jeffrey Pyun
Jeffrey Pyun University of Arizona
Frank Heatley
Frank Heatley University of Manchester
Dominik Konkolewicz
Dominik Konkolewicz Miami University
Cheng Wang
Cheng Wang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Bernadette Charleux
Bernadette Charleux Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Bert Klumperman
Bert Klumperman Stellenbosch University
Sergei S. Sheiko
Sergei S. Sheiko University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Joseph M. DeSimone
Joseph M. DeSimone Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related fields such as forensic science can open diverse career opportunities. An online master's in forensic psychology offers specialized knowledge that complements chemical analysis skills and can lead to roles in criminal investigations.

Understanding forensic career paths and salary is essential for making informed decisions about your professional future. Forensic scientists utilize chemistry extensively, and salaries vary based on education and experience, reflecting the field's technical demands.

Cost is a significant factor when considering further education. Reviewing information on how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help prospective students plan financially for their studies, especially when pursuing degrees that intersect with chemistry and law enforcement.

Starting with foundational education is also vital. The best online associates in criminal justice programs provide accessible entry points for students exploring the intersection of chemistry, forensic science, and the criminal justice system.

Best Scientists Citing Scott G. Gaynor

Recently Published Articles