World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
36
Citations
5405
World Ranking
2526
National Ranking
902

Scott A. Morton publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Morton sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 165 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Scott A. Morton D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Morton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • An effective imaging condition for reverse-time migration using wavefield decomposition

    Unknown

  • Accuracy and Coupling Issues of Aeroelastic Navier-Stokes Solutions on Deforming Meshes

    Scott A. Morton;Reid B. Melville;Miguel R. Visbal

  • On the interaction between a turbulent open channel flow and an axial-flow turbine

    L. P. Chamorro;C. Hill;S. Morton;Christopher Ellis

  • Computational challenges in high angle of attack flow prediction

    Russell M. Cummings;James R. Forsythe;Scott A. Morton;Kyle D. Squires

  • Kestrel -- A Fixed Wing Virtual Aircraft Product of the CREATE Program

    Scott A. Morton;Brett Tillman;David R. McDaniel;David R. Sears

  • Applied Computational Aerodynamics: A Modern Engineering Approach

    Russell M. Cummings;William H. Mason;Scott A. Morton;David R. McDaniel

  • Implementation of a fully-implicit, aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solver

    Reid Melville;Scott Morton;Donald Rizzetta

  • Analysis of Delta-Wing Vortical Substructures Using Detached-Eddy Simulation

    Anthony M. Mitchell;Scott A. Morton;James R. Forsythe;Russell M. Cummings

  • Kestrel: A Fixed Wing Virtual Aircraft Product of the CREATE Program

    Scott Morton;David McDaniel;David Sears;Brett Tillman

  • DES and RANS simulations of delta wing vortical flows

    S. Morton;J. Forsythe;A. Mitchell;D. Hajek

  • Progress on detached-eddy simulation of massively separated flows

    Kyle D. Squires;James R. Forsythe;Scott A. Morton;William Z. Strang

  • Hopf-Bifurcation Analysis of Airfoil Flutter at Transonic Speeds

    Scott A. Morton;Philip S. Beran

  • Fully implicit aeroelasticity on overset grid systems

    Reid Melville;Scott Morton

  • Experiences in accurately predicting time-dependent flows

    Russell M. Cummings;Scott A. Morton;David R. McDaniel

  • Numerical Prediction and Wind Tunnel Experiment for a Pitching Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle

    Russell M. Cummings;Scott A. Morton;Stefan G. Siegel

  • Accuracy and Performance Improvements to Kestrel’s Near-Body Flow Solver

    David R. McDaniel;Robert H. Nichols;Timothy A. Eymann;Robert E. Starr

  • DES GRID RESOLUTION ISSUES FOR VORTICAL FLOWS ON A DELTA WING AND AN F-18C

    Scott A. Morton;Matthew B. Steenman;Russell M. Cummings;James R. Forsythe

  • Microseismic joint location and anisotropic velocity inversion for hydraulic fracturing in a tight Bakken reservoir

    Junlun Li;Chang Li;Scott A. Morton;Ted Dohmen

  • High Resolution Turbulence Treatment of F/A-18 Tail Buffet

    Scott A. Morton;Russell M. Cummings;Denis B. Kholodar

  • Accuracy and coupling issues of aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solutions on deforming meshes

    Scott Morton;Reid Melville;Migual Visbal

Frequent Co-Authors

Mrinal K. Sen
Mrinal K. Sen The University of Texas at Austin
Alan Levander
Alan Levander Rice University
Thomas Stieglitz
Thomas Stieglitz University of Freiburg
Sergey Fomel
Sergey Fomel The University of Texas at Austin
Mike Warner
Mike Warner Imperial College London
William W. Symes
William W. Symes Rice University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their academic horizons beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, related online degrees offer flexible and accessible options. Programs such as the easiest slp masters programs to get into provide pathways for those seeking entry into specialized fields, balancing rigor with accessibility.

Cost is a major factor when considering online education. Understanding tuition and fees upfront helps students plan effectively. Comprehensive guides like those on online speech pathology degree tuition and fees breakdown expenses, covering diverse program options to support informed decisions.

Veterans also have tailored opportunities with several institutions offering support through dedicated programs. Resources such as online speech pathology bachelor degree for veterans highlight benefits and pathways designed specifically for those transitioning into civilian careers.

For those aiming to expedite their education, accelerated pathways like 5-year speech pathology programs combine bachelor's and master's study, enabling quicker entry into the workforce with advanced credentials. These programs emphasize efficiency without compromising quality.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Morton