World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 47 15500 13976 71 63 255 10504

Maria Ziolek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maria Ziolek between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maria Ziolek published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2010. 4 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2010. 1978: 2 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1978 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maria Ziolek: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 2
1979 1
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 1
1987 5
1988 4
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 2
1994 3
1995 2
1996 4
1997 3
1998 4
1999 4
2000 7
2001 3
2002 6
2003 12
2004 10
2005 11
2006 10
2007 8
2008 12
2009 9
2010 15
2011 9
2012 10
2013 7
2014 9
2015 7
2016 8
2017 11
2018 5
2019 14
2020 10
2021 9
2022 1
2023 3
2024 1
2025 3
Total 257
Download as CSV

Maria Ziolek publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Ziolek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 255 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 255
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Maria Ziolek D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Ziolek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776 47
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maria Ziolek is affiliated with Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań in Poland. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Materials Science and Engineering, with a strong emphasis on Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Catalysis, Organic Chemistry, and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Their work spans several key topics linked to catalytic processes, with notable research areas including Catalytic Processes in Materials Science, Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis, Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies, Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions, Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions, Catalysis for Biomass Conversion, and Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis.

Maria Ziolek has contributed to numerous publications. Noteworthy recent papers include:

  • Enhanced adsorption and degradation of methylene blue over mixed niobium-cerium oxide - Unraveling the synergy between Nb and Ce in advanced oxidation processes, 2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Gold based on SBA-15 supports - Promising catalysts in base-free glucose oxidation, 2020, Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Niobium: The Focus on Catalytic Application in the Conversion of Biomass and Biomass Derivatives, 2023, Molecules
  • Gold-containing Beta zeolite in base-free glucose oxidation - The role of Au deposition procedure and zeolite dopants, 2021, Catalysis Today
  • The importance of residual water for the reactivity of MPTMS with silica on the example of SBA-15, 2020, Applied Surface Science

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as Molecules, Catalysts, Materials, RSC Advances, and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Collaborations are an integral part of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Maciej Trejda
  • Łukasz Wolski
  • Adrian Walkowiak
  • Izabela Sobczak
  • Katarzyna Stawicka

Best Publications

  • Catalytic ozonation and methods of enhancing molecular ozone reactions in water treatment

    Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern;Maria Ziółek;Jacek Nawrocki

  • Niobium Compounds: Preparation, Characterization, and Application in Heterogeneous Catalysis.

    Izabela Nowak;Maria Ziolek

  • Niobium-containing catalysts—the state of the art

    Maria Ziolek

  • Cu state and behaviour in MCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves modified with copper during the synthesis––comparison with copper exchanged materials

    Izabela Sobczak;Maria Ziolek;Monika Renn;Piotr Decyk

  • Nickel containing MCM-41 and AlMCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves: Characteristics and activity in the hydrogenation of benzene

    R Wojcieszak;S Monteverdi;M Mercy;I Nowak

  • Catalytic upgrading of woody biomass derived pyrolysis vapours over iron modified zeolites in a dual-fluidized bed reactor

    A. Aho;N. Kumar;A.V. Lashkul;K. Eränen

  • Catalytic liquid-phase oxidation in heterogeneous system as green chemistry goal—advantages and disadvantages of MCM-41 used as catalyst

    Maria Ziolek

  • Insight into pathways of methylene blue degradation with H 2 O 2 over mono and bimetallic Nb, Zn oxides

    Lukasz Wolski;Maria Ziolek

  • Formation of reactive oxygen species upon interaction of Au/ZnO with H2O2 and their activity in methylene blue degradation

    Lukasz Wolski;Adrian Walkowiak;Maria Ziolek

  • The role of niobium component in heterogeneous catalysts

    Maria Ziolek;Izabela Sobczak

  • Synthesis and characterization of niobium-containing MCM-41

    Maria Ziolek;Izabela Nowak

  • Oxidative properties of niobium-containing mesoporous silica catalysts

    Maria Ziolek;Izabela Sobczak;Anna Lewandowska;Izabela Nowak

  • Study of nickel catalysts supported on Al2O3, SiO2 or Nb2O5 oxides

    A. Jasik;R. Wojcieszak;S. Monteverdi;M. Ziolek

  • Search for reactive intermediates in catalytic oxidation with hydrogen peroxide over amorphous niobium(V) and tantalum(V) oxides

    Maria Ziolek;Izabela Sobczak;Piotr Decyk;Kamila Sobańska

  • Acidity study of Nb-containing MCM-41 mesoporous materials. Comparison with that of Al-MCM-41

    M. Ziolek;I. Nowak;J.C. Lavalley

  • Epoxidation of cyclohexene on Nb-containing meso- and macroporous materials

    Izabela Nowak;Beata Kilos;Maria Ziolek;Anna Lewandowska

  • Glycerol oxidation on gold catalysts supported on group five metal oxides—A comparative study with other metal oxides and carbon based catalysts

    Izabela Sobczak;Katarzyna Jagodzinska;Maria Ziolek

  • MCM-41 mesoporous molecular sieves supported nickel—physico-chemical properties and catalytic activity in hydrogenation of benzene

    A Lewandowska;S Monteverdi;M Bettahar;M Ziolek

  • Niobium rich SBA-15 materials : preparation, characterisation and catalytic activity

    M. Trejda;A. Tuel;J. Kujawa;B. Kilos

  • The role of niobium in the gas- and liquid-phase oxidation on metallosilicate MCM-41-type materials

    B Kilos;M Aouine;I Nowak;M Ziolek

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Daturi
Marco Daturi Université de Caen Normandie
Jean-Claude Lavalley
Jean-Claude Lavalley Université de Caen Normandie
Frederik Tielens
Frederik Tielens Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Miguel A. Bañares
Miguel A. Bañares Spanish National Research Council
Eric M. Gaigneaux
Eric M. Gaigneaux Université Catholique de Louvain
Stanislaw Dzwigaj
Stanislaw Dzwigaj Sorbonne University
Alain Tuel
Alain Tuel Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Françoise Maugé
Françoise Maugé Université de Caen Normandie
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern
Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Fields like forensic science and forensic psychology often intersect with chemistry, especially in areas such as toxicology and crime scene analysis. Students can find affordable programs by researching options like online forensic science degree programs, which offer practical skills applicable in legal and investigative settings.

Advancing education through a master's in forensic psychology online is another pathway that combines scientific understanding with behavioral analysis, opening doors to specialized roles within law enforcement and criminal justice sectors. However, it's important to consider the overall investment when selecting a program. For example, reviewing the cost of criminal justice degree programs can help prospective students make informed decisions based on tuition and fees.

Career-wise, the forensic science sector offers various high paying jobs in forensics, including roles in labs, consultancy, and federal agencies. By leveraging chemistry knowledge alongside specialized forensic training, graduates can position themselves for success in this competitive field. Understanding these interconnected pathways helps students align their education choices with long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Ziolek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles