World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 51 14185 20 180 7107

Luis D. Martinez publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Luis D. Martinez between 1993 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Luis D. Martinez published across 29 years, from 1993 to 2021, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2005. 2 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2005. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 8 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication
1993 2021

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Luis D. Martinez: publications per year, 1993 to 2021
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 3
1998 5
1999 4
2000 7
2001 10
2002 11
2003 11
2004 8
2005 15
2006 6
2007 10
2008 12
2009 12
2010 13
2011 6
2012 9
2013 9
2014 7
2015 6
2016 4
2017 1
2018 8
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
Total 184
Download as CSV

Luis D. Martinez publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis D. Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 180 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 180
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Luis D. Martinez D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis D. Martinez sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861 51
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Luis D. Martinez was affiliated with the National University of San Luis in Argentina. Their research contributions spanned several fields within the chemical and biological sciences, particularly focusing on the development of analytical chemistry methods and applications to agricultural and food safety.

The scientist's main areas of study encompassed:

  • Chemistry
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In subfields, their work contributed to:

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Plant Science
  • Food Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Spectroscopy

The primary research topics addressed by Luis D. Martinez included:

  • Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Their recent publications listed two notable scientific papers. The first, published in 2021, was titled Development of a novel UHPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ochratoxin A in tea, appearing in the journal Heliyon. This paper discussed an advanced chromatographic technique aimed at detecting toxins in dietary products.

The second paper, published in 2020 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, was titled Volcanic ashes as a source for nitrated and oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollution. This study explored environmental pollution linked to volcanic activity, analyzing the chemical composition and potential health risks associated with specific pollutants.

The scientist collaborated frequently with several coauthors throughout their career, including:

  • Soledad Cerutti
  • Mariel Cina
  • María del Valle Ponce
  • María Guiñez
  • Luis A. Escudero

Publication venues where their work appeared included:

  • Heliyon
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research

These contributions reflect a focus on method development combined with applied research in toxicology and environmental chemistry with implications for food safety and public health monitoring.

Best Publications

  • Sensitive determination of mercury in tap water by cloud point extraction pre-concentration and flow injection-cold vapor-inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

    Jorgelina C.A de Wuilloud;Rodolfo G Wuilloud;Marı́a F Silva;Roberto A Olsina;Roberto A Olsina

  • Trace element determination of Argentine wines using ETAAS and USN-ICP-OES.

    R. Lara;S. Cerutti;S. Cerutti;J.A. Salonia;R.A. Olsina;R.A. Olsina

  • Determination of heavy metals for the quality control in Argentinian herbal medicines by ETAAS and ICP-OES.

    María R. Gomez;Soledad Cerutti;Soledad Cerutti;Lorena L. Sombra;María F. Silva;María F. Silva

  • Determination of melatonin in wine and plant extracts by capillary electrochromatography with immobilized carboxylic multi-walled carbon nanotubes as stationary phase.

    Patricia W. Stege;Lorena L. Sombra;Germán Messina;Luis D. Martinez

  • Coupling cloud point extraction to instrumental detection systems for metal analysis

    María Fernanda Silva;María Fernanda Silva;Estela Soledad Cerutti;Estela Soledad Cerutti;Luis Dante Martinez;Luis Dante Martinez

  • Simple approach based on ultrasound-assisted emulsification-microextraction for determination of polibrominated flame retardants in water samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

    Ariel Ramón Fontana;Rodolfo German Wuilloud;Rodolfo German Wuilloud;Luis Dante Martinez;Luis Dante Martinez;Jorgelina Cecilia Altamirano;Jorgelina Cecilia Altamirano

  • Preconcentration and speciation of chromium in drinking water samples by coupling of on-line sorption on activated carbon to ETAAS determination.

    R.A. Gil;S. Cerutti;S. Cerutti;J.A. Gásquez;R.A. Olsina;R.A. Olsina

  • On-line preconcentration/determination of cadmium in drinking water on activated carbon using 8-hydroxyquinoline in a flow injection system coupled to an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer

    S Cerutti;M.F Silva;J.A Gásquez;R.A Olsina;R.A Olsina

  • Lipid metabolism in liver of rat exposed to cadmium.

    Ethel V. Larregle;Silvia M. Varas;Liliana B. Oliveros;Luis D. Martinez

  • Dispersive solid-phase extraction as a simplified clean-up technique for biological sample extracts. Determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

    Ariel R. Fontana;Alejandra Camargo;Luis D. Martinez;Jorgelina C. Altamirano;Jorgelina C. Altamirano

  • Determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in water and soil samples by cloud point extraction-ultrasound-assisted back-extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

    Ariel Ramón Fontana;María Fernanda Silva;Luis Dante Martinez;Rodolfo German Wuilloud;Rodolfo German Wuilloud

  • Room temperature ionic liquid-based microextraction for vanadium species separation and determination in water samples by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry.

    Paula Berton;Estefanía Mabel Martinis;Luis Dante Martinez;Rodolfo German Wuilloud;Rodolfo German Wuilloud

  • Analysis of potential adulteration in herbal medicines and dietary supplements for the weight control by capillary electrophoresis

    Valeria Cianchino;Gimena Acosta;Claudia Ortega;Luis D. Martínez

  • Simultaneous determination of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and phenylephrine in expectorant and decongestant syrups by capillary electrophoresis.

    Marı́a R Gomez;Roberto A Olsina;Luis D Martı́nez;Marı́a F Silva

  • On-line preconcentration and determination of nickel in natural water samples by flow injection-inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (FI-ICP-OES).

    N. Yunes;S. Moyano;S. Cerutti;J.A. Gásquez

  • On-line preconcentration and determination of mercury in biological and environmental samples by cold vapor-atomic absorption spectrometry.

    N. Ferrúa;S. Cerutti;S. Cerutti;J.A. Salonia;R.A. Olsina;R.A. Olsina

  • Ultrasound-assisted leaching-dispersive solid-phase extraction followed by liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in sediment samples by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

    Ariel Ramón Fontana;Nerina Belén Lana;Luis Dante Martinez;Jorgelina Cecilia Altamirano;Jorgelina Cecilia Altamirano

  • Determination of some rare earth elements in seawater by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry using flow injection preconcentration

    O Vicente;A Padró;L Martinez;R Olsina

  • Selective determination of inorganic cobalt in nutritional supplements by ultrasound-assisted temperature-controlled ionic liquid dispersive liquid phase microextraction and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry.

    Paula Berton;Estefanía Mabel Martinis;Luis Dante Martinez;Rodolfo German Wuilloud;Rodolfo German Wuilloud

  • Biosorption: A new rise for elemental solid phase extraction methods

    Pablo H. Pacheco;Raúl A. Gil;Raúl A. Gil;Soledad E. Cerutti;Patricia Smichowski

Frequent Co-Authors

Roberto A. Olsina
Roberto A. Olsina National University of San Luis
Rodolfo G. Wuilloud
Rodolfo G. Wuilloud National University of Cuyo
Silvia Goyanes
Silvia Goyanes University of Buenos Aires
Héctor C. Goicoechea
Héctor C. Goicoechea National University of the Littoral
Sergio Luis Costa Ferreira
Sergio Luis Costa Ferreira Federal University of Bahia
Adilson J. Curtius
Adilson J. Curtius Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Miguel de la Guardia
Miguel de la Guardia University of Valencia
Alejandro C. Olivieri
Alejandro C. Olivieri National University of Rosario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry and its practical applications, exploring related degrees like an online bachelor's degree in forensic science can be a great starting point. This degree combines chemical analysis with investigative skills, preparing graduates for various forensic roles.

Advancing further, an online master's degree in forensic psychology offers a unique blend of science and psychology, ideal for those interested in understanding criminal behavior alongside scientific evidence.

Career-wise, the field offers numerous opportunities, which you can explore in detail through comprehensive forensic careers resources. These paths often require specialized knowledge in chemistry, biology, and criminology, and they are crucial for law enforcement and legal systems.

Considering the financial aspect, understanding the criminal justice degree online cost is essential for planning your education budget effectively. Many affordable programs provide quality education without overwhelming expenses.

Best Scientists Citing Luis D. Martinez

Recently Published Articles