World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher John Schofield

Christopher John Schofield

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 60 12090 11135 934 870 138 11166

Christopher John Schofield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher John Schofield between 1958 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher John Schofield published across 66 years, from 1958 to 2023, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2023. 22 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2023. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 21 publications
1958 2023

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher John Schofield: publications per year, 1958 to 2023
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 2
1975 0
1976 2
1977 2
1978 1
1979 1
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 6
1986 8
1987 2
1988 4
1989 2
1990 0
1991 3
1992 1
1993 3
1994 4
1995 0
1996 2
1997 6
1998 8
1999 12
2000 13
2001 12
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 7
2006 3
2007 1
2008 3
2009 1
2010 5
2011 1
2012 2
2013 0
2014 0
2015 2
2016 0
2017 2
2018 1
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
2023 21
Total 165
Download as CSV

Christopher John Schofield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher John Schofield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 137–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 138 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942 138
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher John Schofield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher John Schofield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162 60
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Genetics
  • Zoology

His scientific interests lie mostly in Triatoma infestans, Triatominae, Chagas disease, Ecology and Zoology. His research investigates the connection with Triatoma infestans and areas like Rhodnius prolixus which intersect with concerns in Reduviidae. Christopher J. Schofield has included themes like Evolutionary biology, Polyphyly and Veterinary medicine in his Triatominae study.

His study in Chagas disease is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Transmission, Case detection and Trypanosomiasis. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Vector and Ecology. His Zoology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of DNA sequencing, Clade and Mitochondrial DNA.

His most cited work include:

  • The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review (579 citations)
  • The future of Chagas disease control (529 citations)
  • UNDP/World Bank/WHO special programme for research and training in tropical diseases (TDR) (367 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Christopher J. Schofield mainly investigates Triatominae, Zoology, Chagas disease, Triatoma infestans and Ecology. His Triatominae research incorporates elements of Evolutionary biology, Polyphyly and Veterinary medicine. Christopher J. Schofield combines subjects such as Population genetics, Rhodnius and Genetic variation with his study of Zoology.

His Chagas disease research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Transmission and Vector. His research integrates issues of Triatoma, Triatoma dimidiata and Rhodnius pallescens in his study of Vector. His studies in Triatoma infestans integrate themes in fields like Nymph, Toxicology, Habitat and Environmental health.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Triatominae (37.74%)
  • Zoology (36.79%)
  • Chagas disease (33.96%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2005-2018)?

  • Chagas disease (33.96%)
  • Triatominae (37.74%)
  • Ecology (22.64%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Christopher J. Schofield mostly deals with Chagas disease, Triatominae, Ecology, Vector and Immunology. The concepts of his Chagas disease study are interwoven with issues in Rhodnius prolixus, Forestry, Toxicology and Triatoma infestans. His Triatoma infestans study combines topics in areas such as Reduviidae and Rhodnius.

His Triatominae research integrates issues from Trypanosomiasis, Polyphyly, Subfamily and Systematics, Taxonomy. His Ecology study typically links adjacent topics like Evolutionary biology. His Vector study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Triatoma and Intensive care medicine.

Between 2005 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • The future of Chagas disease control (529 citations)
  • Classification, evolution, and species groups within the Triatominae (281 citations)
  • Phylogeography and Genetic Variation of Triatoma dimidiata, the Main Chagas Disease Vector in Central America, and Its Position within the Genus Triatoma (132 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Genetics
  • Gene

Christopher J. Schofield spends much of his time researching Ecology, Triatominae, Chagas disease, Control methods and Tsetse control. In general Ecology study, his work on Triatoma, Entomology and Rhodnius often relates to the realm of Indoor residual spraying, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His work deals with themes such as Evolutionary biology, Polyphyly, Subfamily and Taxonomy, Systematics, which intersect with Triatominae.

His Chagas disease study is concerned with the larger field of Immunology. A majority of his Control methods research is a blend of other scientific areas, such as Glossinidae, Veterinary medicine, Latin Americans and Trypanosomiasis.

Best Publications

  • The impact of Chagas disease control in Latin America: a review

    J C P Dias;A C Silveira;C J Schofield

  • The future of Chagas disease control

    Chris J. Schofield;Jean Jannin;Roberto Salvatella

  • UNDP/World Bank/WHO special programme for research and training in tropical diseases (TDR)

    C.J. Schofield

  • Classification, evolution, and species groups within the Triatominae

    C.J. Schofield;Cleber Galvão

  • The Southern Cone Initiative against Chagas Disease

    C.J. Schofield;J.C.P. Dias

  • Treatment of health-care-associated infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria: a consensus statement

    Ian Chopra;Christopher Schofield;Martin Everett;Alex O'Neill

  • The molecular evolution of Trypanosomatidae.

    J R Stevens;H A Noyes;C J Schofield;W Gibson

  • The process of domestication in Triatominae.

    C.J. Schofield;L. Diotaiuti;Jean-Pierre Dujardin

  • Phylogeography and Genetic Variation of Triatoma dimidiata, the Main Chagas Disease Vector in Central America, and Its Position within the Genus Triatoma

    María Dolores Bargues;Debora R. Klisiowicz;Fernando Gonzalez-Candelas;Janine M. Ramsey

  • The evolution of Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) control after 90 years since Carlos Chagas discovery.

    J. C. P. Dias;Christopher J. Schofield

  • The ITS-2 of the nuclear rDNA as a molecular marker for populations, species, and phylogenetic relationships in Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), vectors of Chagas disease.

    Antonio Marcilla;Maria Dolores Bargues;Janine M. Ramsey;Ezequiel Magallon-Gastelum

  • Triatominae as a model of morphological plasticity under ecological pressure

    Jean-Pierre Dujardin;P. Panzera;C.J. Schofield

  • Mitochondrial DNA variation of Triatoma infestans populations and its implication on the specific status of T. melanosoma

    Fernando A Monteiro;Fernando A Monteiro;Ruben Pérez;Francisco Panzera;Jean Pierre Dujardin

  • Phylogeny and molecular taxonomy of the Rhodniini derived from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences.

    Fernando A. Monteiro;Dawn M. Wesson;Ellen M. Dotson;Christopher J. Schofield

  • A cost-benefit analysis of Chagas disease control.

    C. J. Schofield;J. C. P. Dias

  • The origin of Rhodnius prolixus in Central America

    Jean-Pierre Dujardin;M. Munoz;T. Chavez;C. Ponce

  • Nuclear rDNA-based molecular clock of the evolution of triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), vectors of Chagas disease

    Bargues;A. Marcilla;J.M. Ramsey;Jean-Pierre Dujardin

  • Chagas disease vector control in Central America

    CJ Schofield;JP Dujardin

  • Population dynamics of Triatoma infestans under natural climatic conditions in the Argentine Chaco

    D. E. Gorla;C. J. Schofield

  • Metric Differences Between Silvatic and Domestic Triatoma infestans (Heteroptera: Reduviidae) in Bolivia

    J. P. Dujardin;H. Bermudez;C. Casini;C. J. Schofield

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Pierre Dujardin
Jean-Pierre Dujardin Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Liléia Diotaiuti
Liléia Diotaiuti Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Michael A. Miles
Michael A. Miles London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Santiago Mas-Coma
Santiago Mas-Coma University of Valencia
Alvaro J. Romanha
Alvaro J. Romanha Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Charles B. Beard
Charles B. Beard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Jamie R. Stevens
Jamie R. Stevens University of Exeter
Cleber Galvão
Cleber Galvão Oswaldo Cruz Foundation
Antonio Marcilla
Antonio Marcilla University of Alicante
Jérémy Bouyer
Jérémy Bouyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Christopher John Schofield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles