Top 10 Qualities of Good Academic Research

Top 10 Qualities of Good Academic Research
Imed Bouchrika, Phd by Imed Bouchrika, Phd
Chief Data Scientist & Head of Content

Today’s technology has vastly improved one’s access to knowledge. As such, this has contributed to the production of notable academic research. In fact, a report from the National Science Foundation shows that the global research output for science and engineering increased at an annual rate of around 4% in the last decade. It is made evident by the large volume of peer-reviewed journal articles and conference papers published each year.

Academic research involves more than just choosing a topic, collecting and analyzing data, and leveraging academic writing tools. To be considered good, research must meet certain criteria. This article aims to answer the question “What are the characteristics of good research?” by listing the criteria for such research. Hopefully, this guide can help researchers ensure the quality of their work.

Qualities of Good Academic Research Table of Contents

  1. What is academic research?
  2. Qualities of Good Research
  3. Common Pitfalls of Doing Research

What is academic research?

Research is a common activity in academic institutions all over the world. In the United States, for instance, research output is bolstered by educational institutions such as Harvard University, Stanford University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Nature Index, n.d.).

Also called scholarly research, academic research has been defined as research that has the sole purpose of creating or furthering knowledge (ARTiFACTS, 2020). Academic research also tends to be theoretically focused, and its findings are evaluated through peer review and made public through scholarly journals and academic conferences.

In many cases, academic research is defined in contrast to professional research. Also called applied research, professional research is carried out to find solutions to practical problems. This research is also commonly organizationally focused (Belmont University, 2021).

Below is a table illustrating the main differences between academic and professional research.

Public School SystemStateEnrollment
New York CityNew York995,192
Los Angeles UnitesCalifornia646,683
Miami-Dade CountyFlorida392,558
Clark CountyNevada324,093
Broward CountyFlorida266,265
Hillsborough CountyFlorida207,469
Orange CountyFlorida191,648
Palm Beach CountyFlorida186,605

Qualities of Good Research

1. Good research is anchored on a sound research question.

A sound research question is one of the most important characteristics of good research. In fact, formulating one is embedded in the curricula of research-heavy programs like engineering and physics degrees and careers. In 2010, Farrugia et al. proposed that developing a research question is the most important step in doing a research project.

A good research question details exactly what a researcher wants to learn and defines a study’s scope. By formulating a good research question, researchers can ensure that they stay on track during the course of their study. In most cases, the research question influences the rest of the steps a researcher takes during his or her study as well.

However, the formulation of a research question is often easier said than done. As such, numerous frameworks–like the FINER and PICO criteria–have been invented to help researchers formulate sound research questions.

For instance, Cummings et al. (2013) suggest using FINER criteria to create or evaluate a research question. According to this set of criteria, a good research question is:

  • F – feasible
  • I – interesting
  • N – novel
  • E – ethical
  • R – relevant

2. Good research follows a systematic, appropriate research methodology.

The overall quality and success of a research study are largely determined by the research methodology it uses (Thattamparambil, 2020). Choosing an appropriate research methodology helps ensure that researchers can collect relevant data and use the right data analysis methods.

Research methodology refers to the systematic procedures or techniques a researcher uses to ensure that his study achieves valid, reliable results (Jansen & Warren, 2020). Research methodologies are often classified into qualitative research, quantitative research, and mixed-methods research.

  • Qualitative research methodology involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data, such as language to interpret subjects’ beliefs, experiences, and behaviors (Pathak et al., 2013). Qualitative research techniques include interviews, focus groups, and case studies.
  • Quantitative research methodologies involve the collection and analysis of numerical data to discover patterns, test relationships, and make predictions (Bhandari, 2021a). In doing quantitative research, surveys, experiments, and systematic observation can be used to collect accurate data.
  • Mixed-methods research methodologies combine quantitative and qualitative methods. According to Wisdom and Cresswell (2013), combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies “permits a more complete and synergistic utilization of data than do separate quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis.”

Researchers must consider a variety of factors in choosing the best methodology for their study. In most cases, research questions and objectives play a significant role in defining the most appropriate research methodology to use.

Researchers should also take into account the methods currently used by other researchers in their specific field. For instance, studies have shown the increasing use of mixed-methods research in the health sciences. In their 2019 article “Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health” published in the Family Medicine and Community Health journal, Cresswell and Hirose observed how surveys were used in combination with focus groups on resident physicians’ communication and collaboration competencies:

“Thus, the authors in the Sonnenberg et al. study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design to examine the ability of the IP clinicians to provide feedback to pediatric residents during their rotation. Using survey research in the first phase, the researchers compared IP supervisors and physician supervisors in terms of communication and if collaborative training objectives were met. …Then, in the second phase, the researchers conducted follow-up qualitative focus groups to probe a contextual understanding of the factors that influenced the process of assessment.”

3. Good research acknowledges previous research on the topic.

While good research leads to the discovery of new knowledge, it also means studying previous research on the topic. By studying scholarly articles and other works related to your subject of interest, you get an idea of what has already been studied and how your study fits into existing research. You can easily find related studies by going through your institution’s library management system or other publicly available ones.

Exploring previous research can also ensure that you’re not duplicating existing work, which is commonly checked in physics and industrial engineering careers. Related literature can also shed light on potential obstacles and issues researchers may encounter during their studies.

Given the importance of studying research related to one’s topic, most academic research projects (like theses or dissertations) feature a literature review. A literature review describes and objectively evaluates scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant to a particular field of study, helping readers gain a full understanding of the topic at hand (Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, n.d.).

According to the latest edition of The STM Report from the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers, there were approximately 33,100 active scholarly peer-reviewed English-language journals in mid-2018. At an annual growth rate of 4%, these journals publish over three million articles a year (Johnson et al., 2018). With these numbers, it appears to be unlikely for researchers to face difficulties in finding literature related to their research topic.

Source: National Science Foundation

4. Good research uses relevant, empirical data and proper data analysis methods.

One of the most important qualities of a good research study is that it deals with empirical data. Empirical data is data that has been collected by researchers themselves through observation, experience, or experimentation (Bradford, 2017). This is crucial in doing good research because empirical data is considered objective, unbiased evidence.

Good research doesn’t stop with the collection of empirical data, the data collected must be analyzed properly as well. The type of data collected largely determines the right data analysis method to use.

Quantitative data, for instance, is usually analyzed through descriptive statistics or inferential statistics (Humans of Data, 2018). These statistics can help researchers find figures to summarize variables, find patterns, and make predictions. On the other hand, the analysis of qualitative data involves identifying and interpreting patterns and themes in textual data. Common analysis methods for qualitative data include content analysis, narrative analysis, and thematic analysis (Warren, 2020).

Using these analysis methods, you can interpret quantitative or qualitative data to answer your research question.

5. Good research is representative and generalizable.

Criteria of good research include being representative. In research, representativeness refers to a sample’s ability to represent a larger group. This means the characteristics of the subjects (people) being studied closely match those of the study’s target population (Austin Research, 2014).

In most cases, representativeness can be achieved through population sampling (Economic Research and Social Council, n.d.). By using proper methods to create a representative sample, researchers can ensure that their findings can be generalized to the larger population represented.

The table below depicts the uses, advantages, and limitations of the most common sampling methods used by researchers today.


6. Good research is guided by logic.

One of the distinguishing characteristics of research is that the entire process is guided by logic. Using logic, for instance, can help researchers determine what kind of data they need for answering their research question. Being guided by logic throughout the research process also helps researchers spot fallacies and inconsistencies in their claims and findings.

The logical processes of induction and deduction can also prove to be valuable in the research process. Golesh et al. (2019) proposed that logic aids researchers by helping them arrive at valid conclusions. According to the study, inductive reasoning can be used to discover patterns and construct generalizations and theories. Meanwhile, deductive reasoning can help researchers collect empirical data to confirm or refute theories or hypotheses.

Aside from these applications of logic, logical reasoning can also make more research more meaningful, especially if the research is to be used in the context of decision-making (Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, n.d.).

7. Good research has external validity.

Good research has external validity if its results or findings can be applied to the real world (Glen, 2015). If your research findings can be generalized to other situations or applied to a broader context, your study has high external validity.

There are two types of external validity for researchers to consider: population validity and ecological validity (Bhandari, 2021b). Research with findings that can be generalized from the sample to the larger population has a high population validity. Meanwhile, you can achieve ecological validity if you can apply your study’s findings to real-world situations and settings.

Since generalizable knowledge is almost always the aim of scientific research, external validity is an important component of good research as well.

8. Good research is replicable, reproducible, and transparent.

Replicability, reproducibility, and transparency are some of the most important characteristics of research. The replicability of a research study is important because this allows other researchers to test the study’s findings. Replicability can also improve the trustworthiness of a research’s findings among readers (Understanding Health Research, 2020).

Good research is also reproducible. Though replicability and reproducibility are often used interchangeably, research is reproducible if researchers achieve consistent results using the same data and analysis methods (Miceli, 2019). The reproducibility and replicability of a research study and its findings can confirm the study’s overall validity and credibility.

For research to be replicable or reproducible, it must also be transparent or available to other researchers. Research must be written or presented in such a way that it provides comprehensive details on how data was collected and analyzed and how conclusions were reached (Baskin, 2015). This is why most scholarly articles provide clear descriptions of their corresponding research process.

Source: American Society for Cell Biology

9. Good research acknowledges its limitations and provides suggestions for future research.

In addition to information on data collection and analysis methods, good research also opens doors for future research on the topic. For instance, researchers can provide details on unexpected study findings or suggest techniques for exploring unaddressed aspects of your research problem or research question (Business Research Methodology, n.d.).

In many cases, these suggestions for future research stem from the research’s limitations. Researchers must acknowledge their study’s limitations and potential flaws and present these along with the study’s findings and conclusion. Ross and Zaidi (2019) further explain that a meaningful presentation of a research study’s limitations includes implications of these limitations and potential alternative approaches.

10. Good research is ethical.

Understandably, good research is carried out according to research ethics. According to the World Health Organization, research ethics provide standards of conduct for scientific researchers. These standards help protect the rights and dignity of research participants while ensuring that researchers practice values, such as honesty, objectivity, integrity, and accountability in their work (Resnik, 2020).

Resnik also emphasizes the importance of learning how to interpret and apply various ethical standards in research, especially since existing ethical codes won’t cover every situation.

Some of the most common violations of research ethics include:

  • Falsification – This involves the manipulation or omission of data or findings.
  • Fabrication – This involves making up data or results and presenting these as accurate.
  • Plagiarism – This refers to the use of another person’s work without giving due credit.

While self-citation and self-referencing are common practices among scientists, recent studies show rising trends in excessive self-citation. A 2017 study on citation metrics revealed that at least 250 scientists collected over 50% of their citations from themselves or their co-authors. This figure is significantly higher than the median self-citation rate of 12.7% (Ioannis et al., 2019).

According to the Committee on Publication Ethics, extreme self-citation is a form of citation manipulation. This manipulation may stem from authorities’ over-reliance on citation metrics to make decisions on career advancement and research funding (Van Noorden & Chawla, 2019). As well, academic institutions and private organizations rely on citations to bolster their h-index ranking and overall institution ranking, creating an overly competitive market that invites unscrupulous scientists and organizations to manipulate the system.

Source: "How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess" (Szomzor et al., 2021)

Common Pitfalls of Doing Research

In addition to the characteristics of good research, researchers must also be aware of the difficulties they may encounter during the course of their study. Shreffler and Huecker (2021) list some of the pitfalls common in the research process:

  • Underestimating the commitment required by a research study – The process of properly conducting a research study and getting it published takes a significant amount of time and effort. Researchers must be prepared not only for lengthy data collection and analysis methods but also for setbacks, such as subjects dropping out of the study and article revisions.
  • Searching for up-to-date, high-quality references – Researchers may also encounter challenges in finding related literature or references that are relevant and up to date. This is why it’s important to do a literature review early during the research process.
  • Not limiting variables of data to be collected – It’s easy to get carried away during the data collection phase and collect as much data as possible. To ensure that the data collection period is used as efficiently as possible, researchers should ignore irrelevant variables in data and focus on the variables that will be most beneficial to the study.

Is your research good enough?

Hopefully, this guide on the qualities of good research has helped you evaluate whether your study is on the right track. Good research starts with a sound research question, which influences the research methodology, including data collection and analysis methods.

The findings of a good research study are based on empirical data collected from a sample representative of the population. More importantly, good research is ethical and transparent. Transparency is crucial in ensuring that a research study is replicable and reproducible. Moreover, you would want your work to be visible, so improving your digital footprint also helps.

If you’re looking for more ways to improve your research study, you can also check out our guide on writing a research paper for publication.



  1. ARTiFACTS. (2020, April 20). What is academic research and what does it look like in practice? ARTiFACTS
  2. Austin Research. (2014, July 30). The importance of representative samples and how to get them. Austin Research
  3. Baskin, P. (2020, December 22). Transparency in research and reporting: Expanding the effort through new tools for authors and editors. Editage Insights
  4. Belmont University. (2021, April 30). Research guides: Public relations: Academic and applied research. Research Guides at Belmont University
  5. Bhandari, P. (2021a). What is quantitative research? | Definition, uses and methods. Scribbr
  6. Bhandari, P. (2021b). External validity | Types, threats & examples. Scribbr
  7. Bradford, A. (2017, July 28). Empirical evidence: A definition. Live Science
  8. Business Research Methodology. (n.d.). Suggestions for future research. Research-Methodology
  9. Creswell, J. W., & Hirose, M. (2019). Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health. Family Medicine and Community Health7(2). NCBI
  10. Cummings, S. R., Browner, W. S., & Hulley, S. B. (2013). Conceiving the research question and developing the study plan. Designing clinical research, 4, 14-22. Wolters Kluwer Health
  11. Economic and Social Research Council. (n.d.). Methodologies: What makes good research? ESRC
  12. Editage Insights. (2019, July 19). What does good research mean? Editage Insights
  13. Farrugia, P., Petrisor, B. A., Farrokhyar, F., & Bhandari, M. (2010). Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Canadian journal of surgery, 53(4), 278. NCBI
  14. Glen, S. (2019, June 27). External validity definition & examples. Statistics How To
  15. Golesh, D., Baba Girei, Z., & Ibrahim, F. (n.d.). The role of logic in research. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research10(10), 894-904. IJSER
  16. Humans of Data. (2019, July 12). Your guide to qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods. Humans of Data
  17. Ioannidis, J. P., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS biology17(8), e3000384. PLoS Biology
  18. Jansen, D. (2021, June 21). What is research methodology? Simple definition (With examples). Grad Coach
  19. Mehran University of Engineering and Technology. (n.d.). Criteria of good research. MUET-CRP
  20. Miceli, S. (2019, September 3). Reproducibility and replicability in research. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 
  21. Nature Index. (n.d.). United States of America (USA) | Country outputs. Retrieved July 9, 2021, from Nature Index
  22. Pathak, V., Jena, B., & Kalra, S. (2013). Qualitative research. Perspectives in clinical research4(3). ProQuest
  23. Resnik, D. (2020, December 23). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  24. Ross, P. T., & Zaidi, N. L. B. (2019). Limited by our limitations. Perspectives on medical education8(4), 261-264. NCBI
  25. Shreffler, J., & Huecker, M. R. (2021). Common Pitfalls In The Research Process. NCBI
  26. Thattamparambil, N. (2020, November 22). How to choose the research methodology best suited for your study. Editage Insights
  27. Understanding Health Research. (n.d.). Replicability. Understanding Health Research
  28. Van Noorden, R., & Chawla, D. (2019, August 19). Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database. Nature
  29. Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. STM
  30. Warren, K. (2021, June 21). Qualitative data analysis methods 101: Top 5 + examples. Grad Coach
  31. Wisdom, J., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Mixed methods: integrating quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis while studying patient-centered medical home models. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ

Newsletter & Conference Alerts uses the information to contact you about our relevant content. For more information, check out our privacy policy.