| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 796 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
The journal investigates studies in Research ethics, Ethical issues, Public relations, Informed consent and Ethical review. In the journal, Social science, Corporate governance and Information ethics are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Research ethics research. Corporate governance and Function (engineering) are closely related fields of research discussed in it.
Topics in Information ethics were tackled in line with various other fields like Nursing ethics and Applied ethics. Meta-ethics is a primary topic of Nursing ethics research in it. It holds forums on Ethical issues that merges themes from other disciplines such as Nursing, Mental health and Applied psychology.
The work on Informed consent tackled in the journal brings together disciplines like Confidentiality, Social psychology and Family medicine. Studies in Social psychology and Process (engineering) are the key highlights in Research Ethics Review. While it primarily focused on Ethical review, it also opened dialogues on the discipline of Qualitative research.
The most cited papers cover a variety of subjects, including Research ethics, Ethical issues, Informed consent, Social psychology and Public relations. The journal publications aim to investigate interdisciplinary topics such as Research ethics and Process (engineering). The works on Social psychology tackled in the published papers bring together disciplines like Qualitative research and Inclusion–exclusion principle.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Research Ethics Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Research Ethics Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 0.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 50.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 50.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An often overlooked yet significant aspect of research ethics is the educational background of authors and reviewers participating in the publication of studies. Understanding the academic realm they come from can give insights into their expertise, their familiarity with research methodologies and abidance to ethical guidelines and principles. The role of education in understanding and implementing research ethics cannot be underestimated.
For instance, authors with a background in Psychology could have profound knowledge on ethics related to human testing. Understanding the significance of informed consent, transparency and confidentiality, they’re likely able to guide ethical nuances in their published works. Similarly, authors from a Medicine or Nursing background might have unique insights on ethics in clinical trials, medicinal research and patient confidentiality.
The educational background of reviewers adds another layer of ethical consideration. Reviewers with varied educational backgrounds can provide diverse perspectives, enhancing the robustness of ethical evaluation in the paper review process.
Belonging to disciplines that require detailed ethical considerations and guidelines such as Mental Health, Social psychology, and family medicine, the authors and reviewers are subject to stringent ethical standards in their educational training and professional practice. If you are interested in understanding how mental health and family therapy professionals are trained in Alaska, checking the Marriage and family therapist education requirements in Alaska might provide some interesting insights.
This section aims to shed light on the elements above, with a specific focus on the backgrounds of the authors and reviewers contributing to this journal. It is designed to offer an additional perspective on the ethical dimensions, reflecting the interconnectedness of research ethics with different academic backgrounds.
Unknown
(2023)Rafael Dal-Ré;Lex M. Bouter;Pim Cuijpers;Christian Gluud
(2020)Richard Yetter Chappell;Peter Singer
(2020)Victoria Williamson;Dominic Murphy;Carl Castro;Eric Vermetten
(2021)Katie Lamb;Cathy Humphreys;Kelsey Hegarty
(2021)Laurel E Meyer;Lauren Porter;Meghan E Reilly;Caroline Johnson
(2021)Studying Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to diverse career pathways, many of which are now accessible through flexible online programs. For example, those passionate about library sciences can pursue a librarian degree online, preparing for careers managing information resources in various settings.
Language skills are also in high demand. An online degree in Spanish offers not only cultural enrichment but also practical benefits, enhancing job prospects in translation, education, and international relations.
Veterans interested in language studies can find specialized opportunities as well. A spanish degree online for veterans helps smooth the transition to civilian careers, leveraging military experience alongside academic credentials.
For those fascinated by human behavior and law enforcement, careers such as becoming an FBI profiler are attainable with the right educational background. Learning about the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit through resources on how to fbi behavioral analysis unit careers provides insights into the training, salary, and job outlook in this specialized field.
