Physiological Reports

Top Research Topics at Physiological Reports?

The topics of Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Cardiology, Skeletal muscle and Blood pressure are the focal point of discussions in the journal. Internal medicine studies presented include Insulin, Heart rate, Insulin resistance, Kidney and Inflammation. Endocrinology study tackled is connected to the field of Receptor.

The Cardiology study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Surgery.

• Internal medicine (59.36%)
• Endocrinology (43.33%)
• Cardiology (14.90%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Salmonella‐infected crypt‐derived intestinal organoid culture system for host–bacterial interactions (132 citations)
• Leaky intestine and impaired microbiome in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model (114 citations)
• Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in patients with chronic kidney disease (111 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Physiological Reports:

The most cited papers mainly tackle studies in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Skeletal muscle, Cardiology and Pathology. Many of the studies tackled in the most cited articles connect Internal medicine with a similar field of study like Surgery. The studies on Endocrinology discussed at the most cited papers can also contribute to research in the domains of Inflammation and Mitochondrion.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Physiological Reports (based on the number of publications) are:

• Naoto Fujii (15 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Jens J. Holst (14 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Michael J. Joyner (13 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Glen P. Kenny (13 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Matthew D. Muller (12 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Physiological Reports (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Copenhagen (99 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Veterans Health Administration (59 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Mayo Clinic (50 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 6 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Michigan (43 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Pennsylvania State University (41 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.32% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 13.49% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.58% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.58% of all publications and 56.35% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Cross-Disciplinary Integrations of Research at Physiological Reports

Considering the increasing trend of inter-disciplinary studies, it is not uncommon for scientific literature in one area to substantially engage with concepts, techniques, and theories from other areas. Particularly, physiological reports may also intersect with other fields such as nursing research, health management, and more, offering wider scopes of studies.

Considering this, researchers, especially those studying physiology, may also further their expertise and breadth of knowledge by exploring nursing. In Ohio, for instance, there are numerous online nursing programs that provide a comprehensive understanding of the medical sphere, including physiology. Our readers might want to check out the {anchor} online nursing schools in Ohio for a broader perspective on healthcare and its interconnected elements.

Such integration is an asset to both novices and masters in the field of research. By combining their specialized knowledge with that of other disciplines, researchers can work towards a more comprehensive approach to problem-solving, which is a hallmark of effective healthcare delivery.