1094-8341
Published by: American Physiological Society
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetics | 104 | 22 | 24 | 9 |
| Molecular Biology | 155 | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Biology and Biochemistry | 533 | 43 | 39 | 11 |
| Medicine | 1821 | 55 | 46 | 14 |
The discussions in the journal mainly cover the fields of Endocrinology, Genetics, Gene expression, Gene and Cell biology. The journal focuses on Endocrinology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Receptor and Downregulation and upregulation. Many of the studies tackled connect Genetics with a similar field of study like Computational biology.
Physiological Genomics explores topics in Gene expression which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Molecular biology and Regulation of gene expression. The Cell biology works, particularly on Signal transduction are tackled in Physiological Genomics. Some problems in Gene expression profiling that were presented in Physiological Genomics overlapped with concepts under Microarray analysis techniques, Immunology and Bioinformatics.
The majority of Immunology studies presented zero in on Inflammation. The journal focuses on Quantitative trait locus research which is adjacent to topics in Congenic.
The most cited publications facilitate discussions on Gene expression, Endocrinology, Gene expression profiling, Genetics and Gene. Issues in Gene expression were discussed in the most cited publications, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Molecular biology, Regulation of gene expression, Immunology and Cell biology. The studies on Endocrinology discussed at the published articles can also contribute to research in the domains of Inflammation and Downregulation and upregulation.
Physiological Genomics facilitates discussions on Transcriptome, Cell biology, Endocrinology, Gene and Cancer research. Physiological Genomics addresses concerns in Transcriptome which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Progenitor, Downregulation and upregulation, Endoplasmic reticulum, Extracellular matrix and Circadian rhythm. Issues in Cell biology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Transcription (biology), Age dependent and Gene expression.
Topics in Gene expression were tackled in line with various other fields like Fructose, Food science, Sucrose, Dietary Carbohydrates and C57bl 6j. It held discussions to help close the divide between two different fields of study: Endocrinology and Context (language use). In the journal, Murine model, Anaerobic exercise, Pharmacology and Heart rate are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Gene research.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Physiological Genomics (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Physiological Genomics (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.44% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 15.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 15.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 22.50% of all publications and 47.50% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Ahmad Alimadadi;Sachin Aryal;Ishan Manandhar;Patricia B. Munroe;Patricia B. Munroe
(2020)Rachel M Golonka;Piu Saha;Beng San Yeoh;Saurabh Chattopadhyay
(2020)Katherine A Maki;Katherine A Maki;Larisa A Burke;Michael W Calik;Miki Watanabe-Chailland
(2020)Tarek M El-Achkar;Michael T Eadon;Rajasree Menon;Blue B Lake
(2021)Markus H Drag;Tuomas O Kilpeläinen
(2021)Alexandra Dainis;Kathia Zaleta-Rivera;Alexandre Ribeiro;Alexandre Ribeiro;Andrew Chia Hao Chang
(2020)For those interested in medicine but exploring other healthcare roles, there are diverse educational pathways available online. Many registered nurses aim to advance their careers by enrolling in rn to bsn programs. These programs offer flexibility and affordability, allowing nurses to enhance their qualifications without disrupting their work schedules.
Prospective nursing students who seek a less stressful admission process might consider nursing school without teas test options. These schools provide accessible entry points into nursing careers, ideal for those who want to avoid standardized exam pressures.
For healthcare professionals aspiring to move into leadership or administrative roles, pursuing an affordable online Master’s in Healthcare Administration is a strategic step. Exploring the most affordable online mha programs can open doors to management positions in hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.
Additionally, accelerated training programs, such as the fastest lpn program, provide a quick pathway into the Licensed Practical Nurse role. These fast-track options enable newcomers to enter the workforce promptly while gaining essential clinical experience.
