World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Neurosurgical Focus
H-index 26

Neurosurgical Focus

1092-0684

Published by: American Association of Neurological Surgeons

https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/neurosurg-focus-overview.xml

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 1113 120 198 21

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 196
Documents by Best Scientists*: 255
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 3
SCIMAGO H-index: 129
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.102
Impact Factor: 3

Overview

Top Research Topics at Neurosurgical Focus?

Neurosurgical Focus is mainly concerned with subjects like Surgery, Radiology, Neurosurgery, Anesthesia and Retrospective cohort study. The Surgery study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Magnetic resonance imaging. It covers various topics on Radiology such as Aneurysm, Embolization and Radiosurgery.

  • Surgery (47.23%)
  • Radiology (16.30%)
  • Neurosurgery (7.48%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. (520 citations)
  • Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica (493 citations)
  • Current status of acute spinal cord injury pathophysiology and emerging therapies: promise on the horizon (487 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Neurosurgical Focus:

The published papers investigate studies in Surgery, Radiology, Anesthesia, Retrospective cohort study and Pathology. Topics like Radiography, Decompression, Spinal fusion, Lumbar and Complication are tackled as part of the discussions on Surgery in the published articles. The published papers feature Radiology research that overlaps with concepts in Resection.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Surgery
  • Internal medicine
  • Radiology

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Neurosurgical Focus covers a variety of subjects, including Surgery, Neurosurgery, Internal medicine, MEDLINE and Radiology. It links adjacent topics like Surgery with Cohort. The journal deals with Neurosurgery in conjunction with Augmented reality and similar fields in Segmentation and Nuclear medicine.

The journal explores topics in Internal medicine which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Oncology and Cardiology. In addition to MEDLINE research, Neurosurgical Focus aims to explore topics under Letter to the editor and Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Meningioma is a major topic of Radiology research.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Magnetic resonance imaging-based synthetic computed tomography of the lumbar spine for surgical planning: a clinical proof-of-concept. (7 citations)
  • Intraarterial delivery of virotherapy for glioblastoma. (5 citations)
  • Evaluation of the precision of operative augmented reality compared to standard neuronavigation using a 3D-printed skull (5 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Neurosurgical Focus (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Praveen V. Mummaneni (69 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition,
  • William T. Couldwell (67 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Michael Wang (52 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
  • Christopher I. Shaffrey (49 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • Robert F. Spetzler (40 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Neurosurgical Focus (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of California, San Francisco (184 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 10 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of Utah (145 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • University of Southern California (138 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
  • Mayo Clinic (133 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 11 less than at the previous edition,
  • Stanford University (107 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 14.04% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.09% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 14.97% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.69% of all publications and 46.26% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Opportunities in the Neurosurgical Field

In addition to expanding your knowledge about research topics, cited papers, and research areas at Neurosurgical Focus, you may also be interested in how this knowledge can be practically applied in the field of neurosurgery. A career in neurosurgery offers many fascinating opportunities to use this knowledge. One such career path is becoming a nurse practitioner specializing in neurosurgery. Nurse practitioners work alongside doctors and play crucial roles in diagnosing and treating patients with neurological issues. They require a strong understanding of the research areas and topics addressed in Neurosurgical Focus. To become a nurse practitioner in the neurosurgical field, you need advanced specialty training in nursing, often at the master’s level. If you are interested in this career path, you can find information on how to become a nurse practitioner in Oklahoma on our dedicated page. Find the link here: how to be a nurse practitioner in Oklahoma. Further expanding career opportunities in the neurosurgical field, you could choose to dive into research, academia, working in specialist neurological hospitals or offering your expertise in varied healthcare setups. Each career path will offer different opportunities to apply the cutting-edge research discussed in Neurosurgical Focus. Remember, irrespective of the path chosen, a career in the field of neurosurgery will continually require a strong commitment to ongoing learning and staying abreast of new research and developments in the field.

Top Publications

  • Middle meningeal artery embolization treatment of nonacute subdural hematomas in the elderly: a multiinstitutional experience of 151 cases

    Evan Joyce;Michael T. Bounajem;Jonathan Scoville;Ajith J. Thomas

    (2020)
    86 Citations
  • The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

    Zhuo Xi;Praveen V Mummaneni;Minghao Wang;Huibing Ruan

    (2020)
    56 Citations
  • Limitations of functional neuroimaging for patient selection and surgical planning in glioma surgery.

    Tej D. Azad;Hugues Duffau

    (2020)
    54 Citations
  • Mapping cognitive and emotional networks in neurosurgical patients using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Michael P Catalino;Shun Yao;Deborah L Green;Edward R Laws

    (2020)
    45 Citations
  • Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion

    Francis C Lovecchio;Avani S Vaishnav;Michael E Steinhaus;Yahya A Othman

    (2020)
    43 Citations
  • The association between lower Hounsfield units of the upper instrumented vertebra and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up

    Ping-Guo Duan;Praveen V Mummaneni;Joshua Rivera;Jeremy M V Guinn

    (2020)
    42 Citations
  • Quality Outcomes Database Spine Care Project 2012-2020: milestones achieved in a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care and evolution to the American Spine Registry.

    Anthony L. Asher;John Knightly;Praveen V. Mummaneni;Mohammed Ali Alvi

    (2020)
    40 Citations
  • Frailty predicts worse outcomes after intracranial meningioma surgery irrespective of existing prognostic factors.

    Brianna C. Theriault;Julia Pazniokas;Anusha S. Adkoli;Edward K. Cho

    (2020)
    38 Citations
  • Blood-brain barrier disruption with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors: a review and perspectives

    Kévin Beccaria;Michael Canney;Guillaume Bouchoux;Stéphanie Puget

    (2020)
    33 Citations
  • Real-time navigation guidance with intraoperative CT imaging for pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head-mounted display: a proof-of-concept study

    Daniel S Yanni;Burak M Ozgur;Robert G Louis;Yevgenia Shekhtman

    (2021)
    32 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the medical field but exploring alternatives to becoming a physician, there are several valuable online degree options. Many healthcare professionals start as nurses, and programs like rn to bsn online offer affordable pathways to advance nursing careers without compromising flexibility.

Prospective nursing students often wonder, is the teas test required for all nursing programs? The answer is no—many schools now waive entrance exams like TEAS and HESI, making nursing education more accessible.

For those looking to shift towards leadership roles within healthcare, pursuing a master's in healthcare administration is a smart move. Exploring cheap mha programs online can provide the skills necessary for managing healthcare facilities effectively without incurring high debt.

Additionally, if quick entry into the healthcare workforce is a priority, consider accelerated options such as a 6 months lpn program. This fast-track route equips students with the essential nursing skills in a short timeframe, enabling rapid employment.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal