Microscopy Research and Technique

Top Research Topics at Microscopy Research and Technique?

Microscopy Research and Technique covers a variety of subjects, including Cell biology, Anatomy, Pathology, Internal medicine and Endocrinology. The majority of Anatomy studies are focused on the issues of Ultrastructure.

• Cell biology (14.02%)
• Anatomy (13.41%)
• Pathology (11.11%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Intracellular and extracellular roles of S100 proteins. (804 citations)
• Dynamics of mitochondria in living cells: Shape changes, dislocations, fusion, and fission of mitochondria (749 citations)
• Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. (714 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Microscopy Research and Technique:

The journal publications are organized to address concerns in the fields of Cell biology, Neuroscience, Internal medicine, Pathology and Anatomy. While Cell biology is the focus of the published papers, it also provides insights into the studies of Biochemistry and Actin cytoskeleton, Cytoskeleton. The study on Internal medicine presented in the published papers is investigated in conjunction with research in Endocrinology.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Gene
• Ecology

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Microscopy Research and Technique mainly deals with areas of study such as Scanning electron microscope, Composite material, Botany, Anatomy and Ultrastructure. While Microscopy Research and Technique focused on Scanning electron microscope, it was also able to explore topics like Dentin, Nuclear chemistry, Microscopy, Enamel paint and Surface roughness. The work on Dentin tackled in Microscopy Research and Technique brings together disciplines like Molar and Adhesive, Bond strength.

The studies in Nuclear chemistry featured incorporate elements of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Nanoparticle. Composite number, Surface finish and Microstructure are all aspects of Composite material research featured in Microscopy Research and Technique. Some problems in Anatomy that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Lamina propria, Tongue and Histology.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Microscopic brain tumor detection and classification using 3D CNN and feature selection architecture (25 citations)
• Automated design for recognition of blood cells diseases from hematopathology using classical features selection and ELM (11 citations)
• Machine learning techniques to detect and forecast the daily total COVID-19 infected and deaths cases under different lockdown types. (9 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Microscopy Research and Technique (based on the number of publications) are:

• Mushtaq Ahmad (86 papers) published 25 papers at the last edition, 9 more than at the previous edition,
• Muhammad Zafar (80 papers) published 22 papers at the last edition, 8 more than at the previous edition,
• Shazia Sultana (58 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 7 more than at the previous edition,
• Alberto Diaspro (35 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Tanzila Saba (32 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 7 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Microscopy Research and Technique (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of São Paulo (156 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 8 more than at the previous edition,
• Quaid-i-Azam University (113 papers) published 39 papers at the last edition, 14 more than at the previous edition,
• Sao Paulo State University (95 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Chinese Academy of Sciences (72 papers) published 10 papers at the last edition, 5 more than at the previous edition,
• State University of Campinas (54 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.56% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 21.87% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.74% of all publications and 55.39% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Pathways to Professional Careers Adjacent to Microscopy Research

A key element that seems to be missing from this article is a consideration of how an understanding or accomplishment in microscopy research and technique might pave the way for diverse career opportunities. For instance, within the medical sector, professions such as pharmacy require an understanding of cell biology and anatomy, areas that are heavily featured in this journal. Apart from academia and pure research, such expertise is needed in more practice-based roles. In addition to the foundational knowledge these research areas provide, the practical skills refined through research methods such as using Scanning Electron Microscopes can be essential in certain roles. For those seeking a dynamic and rewarding profession that involves applying such skills, one popular option is becoming a licensed pharmacist. This career is highly respected in the healthcare industry and offers opportunities for direct interaction with patients, combining the hard science with a more personable aspect. The road to becoming a pharmacist, however, is not without its demands. It requires a specific educational and licensing pathway. For those in South Dakota, for instance, if you are interested in knowing more about becoming a licensed pharmacist in your locale, you can read further details about it at this link. By leveraging the knowledge and skills gained through microscopy research and related studies, a prospective pharmacist can attain a well-rounded scientific foundation that is critical to their everyday work. Collectively, this shows that the work done within the pages of Microscopy Research and Technique can translate into a rewarding professional journey in the clinical field.