Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes

Top Research Topics at Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes?

The topics of Internal medicine, Odds ratio, Emergency medicine, Cardiology and Family medicine are the focal point of discussions in the journal. Most of the Internal medicine studies addressed also intersect with Gastroenterology. The journal focuses on Odds ratio research which is adjacent to topics in Body mass index.

The research on Emergency medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Intensive care unit and Retrospective cohort study. The main emphasis of the journal is the research on Cardiology, emphasizing the topic of Ejection fraction. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes investigates Hazard ratio research which frequently intersects with Proportional hazards model.

• Internal medicine (30.71%)
• Odds ratio (10.05%)
• Emergency medicine (9.51%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Sarcoidosis (50 citations)
• The Many Faces of Cobalamin (Vitamin B12) Deficiency (45 citations)
• Joint Corticosteroid Injection Associated With Increased Influenza Risk (35 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes:

The most cited articles primarily tackle Internal medicine, Mortality rate, Retrospective cohort study, Disease and Randomized controlled trial. The journal publications focus on different Internal medicine studies like Interquartile range, Odds ratio, Etiology, Cohort and Glycemic index. The works on Odds ratio tackled in the most cited papers bring together disciplines like Body mass index and Kidney disease.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Disease

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes primarily tackles Internal medicine, Pandemic, Odds ratio, Family medicine and Intensive care unit. The concepts on Internal medicine presented in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes can also apply to other research fields, including Diabetes mellitus and Cardiology. Aside from discussions in Odds ratio, Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes also deals with the subject of Body mass index which intersects with Retrospective cohort study disciplines.

The studies on Intensive care unit discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Incidence (epidemiology) and Emergency medicine. The study of Heart failure and how it intertwines with concepts under Renal function were explored in the presented Hazard ratio research. In addition to Cohort research, Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes aims to explore topics under Framingham Risk Score and Risk factor.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Thromboinflammatory Biomarkers in COVID-19: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 17,052 Patients. (14 citations)
• Cardiac Toxicity of Chloroquine or Hydroxychloroquine in Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis. (12 citations)
• Safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in elderly COVID-19 patients: the RESCUE trial. (9 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes (based on the number of publications) are:

• Darrell R. Schroeder (7 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• Karen M. Fischer (6 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Carl J. Lavie (6 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Nilay Shah (6 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• M. Hassan Murad (6 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes (based on the number of publications) are:

• Mayo Clinic (232 papers) published 73 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Minnesota (10 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Harvard University (10 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Queensland (8 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Rochester (8 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 2.59% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 76.11% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 5.31% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 7.08% of all publications and 11.50% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Application and Licensure Process

It's worth noting that the exploration of critical medical research topics by Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes is not just theoretical. The outcomes of these research topics can be directly applied to practical applications in healthcare settings. Research findings play a critical role in shaping the skills required by healthcare professionals like nurses to effectively execute their roles. For instance, insights from Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine research can greatly influence the procedures that nurses follow when responding to emergency situations. To be eligible to perform such roles, nursing practitioners, especially in North Carolina, are required to acquire a license that conforms to a specific criteria set by the relevant licensure body. Interested individuals can visit the north carolina nursing license requirements board of nursing requirements to acquire critical information about the application process, requirements for eligibility, fees, and other essential details. By staying informed about the latest research insights and maintaining compliance with the licensure procedure, healthcare professionals can ensure the delivery of premium care services.