1057-0829
Published by: Wolters Kluwer Health
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 1291 | 59 | 205 | 19 |
Journal of Glaucoma is mainly concerned with subjects like Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, Intraocular pressure, Surgery and Trabeculectomy. Journal of Glaucoma facilitates discussions on Glaucoma that incorporate concepts from other fields like Visual field, Optical coherence tomography and Visual acuity. Journal of Glaucoma explores research in Optical coherence tomography and the adjacent study of Tomography.
Nerve fiber layer, Retinal, Ocular hypertension, Optic disc and Optic nerve are some of the facets of Ophthalmology tackled in Journal of Glaucoma. The presented studies in Gonioscopy fall within the purview of Intraocular pressure but it also intertwines with topics in In patient. It is mostly focused on Surgery, specifically Implant.
Discussions in Journal of Glaucoma are anchored in the subject of Trabeculectomy and the similar topic of Mitomycin C.
Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, Intraocular pressure, Surgery and Open angle glaucoma are the main subjects of interest in the most cited articles. The most cited papers explore issues in Glaucoma which can be linked to other research areas like Visual field and Visual acuity. The journal papers cover research in Ophthalmology, particularly Retinal, Optical coherence tomography, Optic nerve and Optic disc and how it is related with concepts in In patient.
The journal generally zeroes in on subjects such as Glaucoma, Ophthalmology, Intraocular pressure, Letter to the editor and Surgery. The research on Glaucoma tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Visual field and Visual acuity. Ophthalmology research in Journal of Glaucoma involves the investigation of Confidence interval studies, all of which are linked to disciplines such as Odds ratio.
In addition to Intraocular pressure research, Journal of Glaucoma aims to explore topics under Randomized controlled trial, Retrospective cohort study and Cataract surgery. Letter to the editor research featured in Journal of Glaucoma incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Optometry and MEDLINE. The presentations discussing Surgery offer insights in topics such as Mitomycin C, Medical record, Implant and Glaucoma drainage device.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Journal of Glaucoma (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Journal of Glaucoma (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.28% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 12.25% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.91% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 23.72% of all publications and 56.13% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
A critical aspect that could enhance and give depth to this article is discussing the professional development of the authors, such as their educational background and licensing, who contribute to the Journal of Glaucoma. Knowledge on the authors’ development can offer a comprehensive understanding of the quality of the published research. Without this information, readers may find it challenging to gauge the potential credibility and weight of the research findings presented in the journal. Considering the fact that the Journal of Glaucoma deals with specialized knowledge in the medical field, specifically Ophthalmology, it is not uncommon for these authors to have advanced nursing degrees, with a focus on the ocular domain. The road to such a position typically involves rigorous professional requirements from their respective states. For example, the indiana nursing license requirements typically entail an extensive nursing education, coupled with passing licensure exams – a process often echoed across different states. In addition to this, there's also an expectation for these professionals to undertake continuous professional development to stay updated with the latest knowledge and breakthroughs in the field, enriching their contributions to journals such as the Journal of Glaucoma. By gaining insight into the educational growth and professional development that these authors have undergone, readers are afforded an in-depth assessment of the research they encounter in the journal. Although it is not the sole determinant, a solid educational background can strongly signify the quality of published works. This underscores the value for readers, especially fellow researchers, to explore the extensive and often stringent requirements authors have overcome, such as the indiana nursing license requirements, in order to actively contribute to advancing invaluable knowledge in the sphere of Glaucoma.
Harsha L Rao;Zia S Pradhan;Min Hee Suh;Sasan Moghimi
(2020)Lukas Mees;Swati Upadhyaya;Pavan Kumar;Sandal Kotawala
(2020)Jeffrey M. Liebmann
(2020)Salman Dar;Carlos G De Moraes;Rabia Karani;Sabine Khan
(2021)Rafaella C Penteado;Rafaella C Penteado;Christopher Bowd;James A Proudfoot;Sasan Moghimi
(2020)David A. Price;Alon Harris;Brent Siesky;Sunu Mathew
(2020)Robert O. Funk;David O. Hodge;Darrell Kohli;Gavin W. Roddy
(2021)Julie M. Shabto;Carlos Gustavo De Moraes;George A. Cioffi;Jeffrey M. Liebmann
(2020)For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional medical degrees, several related online degrees offer flexible and affordable options. For instance, pursuing phd nursing programs online can be an excellent choice for advancing into healthcare leadership or research roles without relocating.
Another growing field is medical billing and coding, which plays a crucial role in the healthcare system. Many online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa provide accessible pathways to certification and financial aid, making it easier for students to enter this in-demand profession.
For students with a background in science, exploring jobs with a biology degree can reveal a variety of rewarding career options in areas like biotechnology, healthcare, and environmental science.
Certification also matters when considering specialized healthcare roles. Understanding the differences between credentials such as a certified professional coder and other certifications can impact salary prospects and job opportunities in medical coding fields.
