JAMA Psychiatry

Top Research Topics at JAMA Psychiatry?

JAMA Psychiatry generally zeroes in on subjects such as Psychiatry, MEDLINE, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine and Depression (differential diagnoses). JAMA Psychiatry explores research in Psychiatry and the adjacent study of Young adult. Studies on MEDLINE discussed in it link to the field of Text mining.

The studies in Clinical psychology featured incorporate elements of Cognition and Anxiety. Internal medicine studies presented include Randomized controlled trial and Meta-analysis. The journal focuses on Randomized controlled trial but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Psychological intervention, Placebo, Clinical trial and Physical therapy.

The study on Schizophrenia presented in the journal intersects with subjects under the field of Psychosis.

• Psychiatry (40.52%)
• MEDLINE (20.02%)
• Clinical psychology (15.81%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Epidemiology of DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions III (1329 citations)
• Mortality in Mental Disorders and Global Disease Burden Implications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (1205 citations)
• A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Infliximab for Treatment-Resistant Depression The Role of Baseline Inflammatory Biomarkers (975 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at JAMA Psychiatry:

The journal papers are organized to address concerns in the fields of Psychiatry, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine, Randomized controlled trial and Young adult. The published papers with studies in Psychiatry featured incorporate elements of Odds ratio and Cohort study. Issues in Clinical psychology were discussed in the journal articles, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Prospective cohort study, Cognition and Anxiety.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Disease
• Psychiatry

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of MEDLINE, Psychiatry, Randomized controlled trial, Depression (differential diagnoses) and Mental health. Concepts in 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak, as well as related topics in Emergency medicine, are covered in the MEDLINE research presented in JAMA Psychiatry. Schizophrenia is a major topic of Psychiatry research presented in the journal.

JAMA Psychiatry explores topics in Schizophrenia which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Meta-analysis, Autism spectrum disorder, Bipolar disorder and Clinical psychology. While Randomized controlled trial is the focus of JAMA Psychiatry, it also provided insights into the studies of Psychological intervention, Physical therapy, Clinical trial and Anxiety. Some problems in Depression (differential diagnoses) that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Demography, Cohort study and Cohort.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial (89 citations)
• Trends in US Emergency Department Visits for Mental Health, Overdose, and Violence Outcomes Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. (68 citations)
• Association of Psychiatric Disorders With Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19. (67 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in JAMA Psychiatry (based on the number of publications) are:

• Ronald C. Kessler (34 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• Kenneth S. Kendler (33 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Paul Lichtenstein (32 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Mark Olfson (29 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
• James C. Harris (26 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in JAMA Psychiatry (based on the number of publications) are:

• Harvard University (224 papers) published 35 papers at the last edition, 10 more than at the previous edition,
• Columbia University (162 papers) published 24 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• King's College London (135 papers) published 18 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Yale University (107 papers) published 14 papers at the last edition, 2 more than at the previous edition,
• Veterans Health Administration (103 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.42% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 47.60% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.83% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.79% of all publications and 17.79% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

The Role of Collaborative Research at JAMA Psychiatry

A crucial section that can be added to this article is a detailed discussion on the significance of collaborative research in JAMA Psychiatry. An analysis of the level of current interdisciplinary research combined with a historical overview would provide succinct context for readers. Collaborations are important as they allow cross-pollination of ideas among different fields and lead to innovative exploration of various research fields.

A large amount of collaborative research is examined and published in JAMA Psychiatry. The journal caters to studies derived from cooperative research among universities, research institutions, and individual professionals. This has given JAMA Psychiatry a unique mandate to publish groundbreaking studies that rely on a multi-disciplinary approach.

For instance, research on nursing, a crucial branch of medical science, can be highly beneficial for the psychiatry field. Exploring possible synergies between these two disciplines could lead to a more holistic approach to mental health. An excellent resource for nursing research is showcased in the best nursing schools in New Hampshire, where various innovative research projects related to psychiatry are underway.

Such collaborations augmented by innovative nursing research can contribute significantly to newer insights in Psychiatry. Therefore, a core component of JAMA Psychiatry’s framework is to foster such interdisciplinary cooperation. This ensures that breakthrough research findings are embedded in the everyday working reality of mental health professionals.