Current Opinion in Critical Care

Top Research Topics at Current Opinion in Critical Care?

Current Opinion in Critical Care mostly deals with topics like Intensive care medicine, MEDLINE, Critically ill, Internal medicine and Cardiology. Current Opinion in Critical Care focuses on Intensive care medicine but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Resuscitation and Randomized controlled trial. Resuscitation research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

While it focused on MEDLINE, it was also able to explore topics like Psychological intervention and Health care. The main emphasis of the journal is the subject of Internal medicine, focusing on Shock (circulatory).

• Intensive care medicine (57.26%)
• MEDLINE (20.89%)
• Critically ill (12.69%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Inflammatory response in acute traumatic brain injury: a double-edged sword. (547 citations)
• Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect. (452 citations)
• Developing a consensus classification system for acute renal failure. (364 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Current Opinion in Critical Care:

The published papers cover a variety of subjects, including Intensive care medicine, MEDLINE, Internal medicine, Anesthesia and Cardiology. The study on Intensive care medicine presented in the published papers is investigated in conjunction with research in Sepsis. The journal papers explore issues in MEDLINE which can be linked to other research areas like Epidemiology, Severity of illness, Health care and Incidence (epidemiology).

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Surgery
• Disease

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The main research concerns discussed in the journal are Intensive care medicine, MEDLINE, Randomized controlled trial, Mechanical ventilation and Pandemic. Topics in Intensive care medicine explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Psychological intervention and Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Aside from discussions in MEDLINE, it also deals with the subject of Traumatic brain injury which intersects with Intensivist disciplines.

Aside from investigating topics in Acute respiratory failure under Mechanical ventilation, the journal also explores concepts in In patient. The research on Pandemic tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Developed country, Epidemiology and Health care. The presented Critically ill research focuses mostly on Sepsis and, on occasion, topics in Resuscitation.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Blood lactate levels in sepsis: in 8 questions. (4 citations)
• How to diagnose delayed cerebral ischaemia and symptomatic vasospasm and prevent cerebral infarction in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. (4 citations)
• Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. (3 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Current Opinion in Critical Care (based on the number of publications) are:

• Rinaldo Bellomo (44 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Claudio Ronco (26 papers) absent at the last edition,
• John A. Kellum (22 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Michael R. Pinsky (21 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Paolo Pelosi (20 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Current Opinion in Critical Care (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Pittsburgh (63 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• University of Toronto (41 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Paris (27 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (27 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Minnesota (25 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.88% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.19% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.10% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.17% of all publications and 53.54% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Opportunities for Further Study and Cross-application of Research

With the wealth of information and diverse research topics encompassed in Current Opinion in Critical Care, there are significant opportunities to delve deeper into each special topic and cross-apply the published findings to other areas. While this journal focuses primarily on intensive care medicine, critically ill patients, internal medicine and associated fields, the potential for further exploration of these topics can extend to specialized fields of nursing, such as the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) profession.

Study could tackle the cross-application of research findings on the most pressing issues in intensive care medicine to the daily practice of LPNs. Specifically, the application of intensive care protocols, Psychological intervention, the use of Randomized controlled trial, and focus on disease can be relevant and thus might warrant an in-depth exploration in the LPN setting, too.

Prospective practitioners can consider online programs to advance their LPN careers while staying updated on these critical subjects in current medical research. For example, those in the Arkansas area may find the compilation of online LPN programs Arkansas useful as they search for a program that aligns with this focus.

In conclusion, there's significant potential to expand research in critical care medicine to practical daily care, especially in the LPN field, and online learning resources can help bridge this gap.