| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology and Biochemistry | 490 | 27 | 23 | 13 |
| Medicine | 1872 | 18 | 27 | 14 |
Toxicity, Toxicology, Pharmacology, Carcinogen and Internal medicine are the subjects of interest in the journal. Some problems in Toxicity that were presented in Critical Reviews in Toxicology overlapped with concepts under Inhalation, Biochemistry, Physiology and Pathology. Xenobiotic is a primary topic of Biochemistry research in it.
Critical Reviews in Toxicology explores issues in Toxicology which can be linked to other research areas like Environmental exposure and Environmental health. It focuses on Environmental health research which is adjacent to topics in Epidemiology. The journal explores topics in Pharmacology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Hormesis and In vivo.
The journal addresses concerns in Carcinogen which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Cancer, Cancer research and Genotoxicity. It explores issues in Internal medicine which can be linked to other research areas like Endocrinology, Mode of action and Oncology. Critical Reviews in Toxicology concentrated on Endocrinology research, specifically Thyroid, Hormone and Endocrine system.
The published papers mostly deal with topics like Toxicity, Toxicology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Carcinogen. The published articles focus on Toxicity but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Environmental chemistry, Endocrinology and Physiology. The Toxicology research presented in the published papers focuses mostly on Environmental exposure and, on occasion, topics in Reproductive toxicity.
Critical Reviews in Toxicology tackles a plethora of topics, such as Environmental health, Cancer research, Pharmacology, Disease and Neurotoxicity. In addition to Environmental health research, it aims to explore topics under Chrysotile, Asbestos, Liver damage, Margin of exposure and Meta-analysis. In it, Oxidative stress, Pulmonary fibrosis, Lung fibrosis, Inflammation and Paraquat are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Cancer research research.
While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Pharmacology, it also covered topics in Non clinical, BIA 10-2474, Clinical trial and Fatty acid amide hydrolase. The featured Neurotoxicity study falls within the wider topic of Toxicity. The concepts on Toxicity presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Microbiome, Combination drug, MDMA, Alcohol and Metabolome.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Critical Reviews in Toxicology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Critical Reviews in Toxicology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 7.14% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.23% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 15.38% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.38% of all publications and 50.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Increasingly, the contemporary landscape of scientific publications advocates interdisciplinary collaboration. Academic partnerships often generate high-impact research, radically catalyze scientific advancements, and are crucial for knowledge diversification. It is interesting to evaluate the scope and nature of collaborations that lead to the formation of high-quality, influential articles in the Critical Reviews in Toxicology. Given the journal's broad thematic spectrum, it is not surprising that the majority of articles feature multiple authors. Statistically, the number of multi-authored papers far surpasses single author papers. The co-authored articles are typically a result of collaborations between different departments within the same institution or partnerships between different institutions, including globally recognized research universities. An article published in the journal can have contributions from several institutions, further demonstrating the reach and impact of collaborative efforts. For instance, these partnerships often include schools offering reputable **[medical assistant programs in North Dakota](https://research.com/universities-colleges/best-medical-assistant-schools-programs-in-north-dakota)** among their collaborators. These collaborations depict a diverse academic network that significantly contributes to the ongoing research presented in the Critical Reviews in Toxicology. Looking deeper into the nature of international collaborations, it becomes evident that certain countries consistently make significant contributions to the published research. Researchers from a vast array of countries, from the United States to China, contribute to the body of literature within this journal. To conclude, understanding the nature of academic collaborations allows us to gain a broader perspective on the interconnected and interdisciplinary research carried out in the realm of toxicology. These collaborations further our understanding and help advance critical studies in toxicology, pharmacology, and beyond, developing a promising blueprint for future research endeavors that shape the scientific world.
Styliani S. Fragki;Hubert Dirven;Tony Fletcher;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
(2021)Omamuyovwi M. Ijomone;Chibuzor W. Ifenatuoha;Oritoke M. Aluko;Olayemi K. Ijomone
(2020)Shalenie P den Braver-Sewradj;Aldert Piersma;Ellen V S Hessel
(2020)Robyn L Prueitt;Wenchao Li;Yu-Chi Chang;Paolo Boffetta;Paolo Boffetta
(2020)David A. Jett;Christopher A. Sibrizzi;Robyn B. Blain;Pamela A. Hartman
(2020)Peter Møller;Rebecca Harnung Scholten;Martin Roursgaard;Annette M. Krais
(2020)Nigel J. Gooderham;Samuel M. Cohen;Gerhard Eisenbrand;Shoji Fukushima
(2020)For students interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can offer alternative routes into healthcare. Many aspiring professionals consider online accelerated nursing programs for non nurses, designed to fast-track career changes into nursing without traditional prerequisites.
Understanding the earning potential of healthcare roles is essential. For instance, evaluating how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make helps inform long-term career decisions, especially in high-demand specialties.
Time commitment is often a critical factor. Students looking to advance quickly can benefit from research into fast track nurse practitioner programs, which offer accelerated paths to licensure and practice.
Additionally, programs such as the 6-month rn to bsn program provide accelerated options for registered nurses aiming to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing in less than a year. These pathways broaden opportunities for career advancement in medicine-related fields.
