1521-6918
Published by: Elsevier
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/best-practice-and-research-clinical-gastroenterology
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 1947 | 50 | 57 | 13 |
Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology generally zeroes in on subjects such as Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Disease, Surgery and Intensive care medicine. Issues in Internal medicine were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Endocrinology and Oncology. It focuses on Oncology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Radiation therapy and Chemotherapy.
Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology tackles studies in Incidence (epidemiology) and the interrelated subject of Epidemiology to gain insights into Gastroenterology. Discussions in Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology are anchored in the subject of Disease and the similar topic of Immunology. Immunology research is the primary subject tackled in the journal with a focus on Immune system.
Endoscopy is a major topic of Surgery research. The field of Radiology is the anchor for the Endoscopy studies presented in Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology. It connects research in Cirrhosis with the related topic of Liver disease.
The journal articles mostly deal with topics like Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Disease, Immunology and Pathology. Most of the works presented in the journal articles deal with Internal medicine but they intersect with the subject of Endocrinology. Carcinoma and Pancreas are some topics wherein Gastroenterology research discussed in the most cited papers has an impact.
Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology tackles a plethora of topics, such as Cancer, Internal medicine, Endoscopy, Disease and Immunosuppression. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Cancer, it also covered topics in Stomach, Helicobacter pylori, Early detection and Intensive care medicine. Topics in Internal medicine were tackled in line with various other fields like Gastroenterology and Oncology.
The studies on Gastroenterology discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Fundic Gland Polyp, Fundic gland polyposis, Dysplasia and Large intestine. The studies in Endoscopy featured incorporate elements of Patient risk, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and Computer-aided diagnosis. The concepts on Disease presented in Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology can also apply to other research fields, including Immune Modulators, Immune system, Liver injury and Clinical trial.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 12.20% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 27.78% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.11% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 44.44% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
This article has largely focused on the academic and research aspects of Clinical Gastroenterology. However, for those interested in making a career in this field, it is integral to consider the employment opportunities. The clinical skill-set acquired throughout your studies can open up several paths not only in research, but also in medical practice and education. For instance, medical graduates specializing in gastroenterology can opt for a job in a hospital or even set up their private clinics. Licensed healthcare professionals can put their skills to practice by diagnosing and treating disorders ranging from gastroesophageal reflux, to more intensive diseases such as cirrhosis. Clinical Gastroenterologists usually work in an interdisciplinary team in hospital settings, often collaborating with radiologists and surgeons. Those inclined towards education can look to teach undergraduate and graduate level courses at universities. Given their expertise, gastroenterologists are typically well-equipped to supervise doctoral candidates or medical students in their respective universities. With research-practice integration at the heart of medical science, university researchers usually engage in both teaching and research. This flexible career trajectory makes clinical gastroenterology an intriguing field to explore. However, it is an intensive academia, requiring completion of degree, training and passing a licensing examination. There are several programs which provide online or remote education, allowing for a flexible learning experience. For instance, such a program can be found among the best online nursing programs in Missouri, focusing on the intricacies of gastroenterology nursing. Having elaborated the career opportunities in clinical gastroenterology, it is clear that employment opportunities are as diverse as the research topics under its umbrella. The choice of career path in this field can depend on one's professional goals, commitment to academia or practical healthcare provision and personal interest.
Jin Young Park;Rolando Herrero
(2021)Maria Meneghini;Oriol Bestard;Josep Maria Grinyo
(2021)Johan Noble;Florian Terrec;Paolo Malvezzi;Lionel Rostaing
(2021)Silvia Catanese;Florian Lordick
(2021)Gianluca Businello;Francesca Galuppini;Matteo Fassan
(2021)For those interested in the medical field but seeking alternative educational routes, online degrees offer flexible and affordable options. Many aspiring healthcare professionals consider programs such as the cheapest online BSN programs to advance their nursing careers without breaking the bank.
Entry requirements for nursing programs can vary widely. If you’re wondering, do you have to take the TEAS test to get into nursing school, the answer depends on the institution; some schools waive this requirement, making it easier for students to enroll.
For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing a Master’s degree through the most affordable MHA programs can be a strategic step towards management roles in hospitals and health systems.
Additionally, practical nursing roles can be quickly accessed via programs like the 10 month LPN program, offering a fast-track path into the workforce for those seeking hands-on patient care positions.