World Online Ranking of Best Electronics and Electrical Engineering Scientists – 2023 Report
Electronics and electrical engineering scientist rankings: what this guide helps you decide
If you are trying to identify the most influential researchers in electronics and electrical engineering, the best institutions in the field, or the countries with the deepest research clusters, the 2023 Research.com ranking is a useful place to start. It is especially relevant for graduate applicants, faculty, research administrators, and industry professionals who want to find collaborators, compare programs, or understand where the field is moving.
This guide breaks down the ranking in a practical way. You will learn what the ranking measures, how to read it without overinterpreting it, which countries and universities stand out, and how to use the results when choosing a supervisor, graduate program, or research direction.
Quick answer: what the 2023 ranking shows
The 2023 Research.com ranking reviewed more than 10,355 scientist profiles and included scholars whose work was primarily in electronics and electrical engineering and whose D-index, or Discipline H-index, was at least 30. The ranking also considered how much of each scientist’s work was tied to the field, plus awards and achievements.
The United States had the largest representation with 468 scientists, or 46.8% of the ranking. China followed with 113 scientists, or 11.3%. Globally, Professor Frede Blaabjerg of Aalborg University in Denmark held the top position with an h-index of 176, and MIT led institutions with 28 ranked scientists.
What this ranking is actually useful for
This is not just a list of famous names. Used well, it can help you map where strong research is concentrated, identify active labs, and compare institutions by depth of expertise in a specific technical area.
That said, bibliometric rankings have limits. They are strongest when paired with evidence that matters to your decision: current research topics, supervision availability, lab access, funding, publication fit, student outcomes, and accreditation for degree programs.
| If you want to... | Use the ranking to... | Also verify... |
| Find a potential advisor | Locate highly cited scholars in your topic area. | Recent publications, whether they are accepting students, and current lab openings. |
| Compare graduate programs | See which universities repeatedly appear in the field. | Curriculum, funding, facilities, placement outcomes, and accreditation. |
| Identify collaboration hubs | Spot countries and institutions with dense research activity. | Grant activity, conference presence, and cross-institution partnerships. |
| Understand field direction | Track where top scholars are concentrated. | Emerging topics, industry demand, and policy priorities. |
Why electronics and electrical engineering matters right now
Electronics and electrical engineering sit at the center of several major technology transitions. The field supports power grids, semiconductors, battery systems, communications, electric vehicles, automation, and the infrastructure behind digital services. That makes the discipline highly relevant to energy security, manufacturing resilience, and climate goals.
Research activity in the field is especially important because many of today’s biggest engineering challenges are system-level problems. Better batteries, smarter charging networks, more efficient power electronics, and more reliable grid controls all require collaboration across universities, industry, and government.
What current research in the field is focusing on
Recent work in electronics and electrical engineering has centered on smart grids, EV charging systems, advanced power electronics, energy storage, and materials for next-generation batteries. These areas are closely tied to decarbonization and to the push for more dependable infrastructure.
In 2022, a major theme was reducing the technical barriers to lower-carbon energy systems. That included better charging architectures for electric vehicles and ongoing work on sustainable materials for battery design that could improve safety, durability, and scale.
Top findings from the 2023 scientist ranking
- The United States had the largest share of ranked scientists, with 468 researchers representing 46.8% of the full list.
- China ranked second with 113 scientists, or 11.3%.
- Canada and the United Kingdom each had 53 ranked scientists, or 5.3%.
- Japan had 33 scientists, Australia had 32, and Switzerland had 28.
- Among the top 1%, 4 out of 10 scientists were affiliated with U.S. institutions, while the other 6 were affiliated with institutions in Denmark, Australia, China, Singapore, Canada, and Japan.
- Professor Frede Blaabjerg of Aalborg University ranked first worldwide with an h-index of 176.
- MIT led all institutions in the 2023 edition with 28 ranked scientists.
- Seven of the top 10 institutions were based in the United States, while two were in Switzerland and one was in Singapore.
- The average h-index for the top 1% was 151.7, compared with 75.61 across all scientists in the ranking.
The full 2023 ranking can be found here:
World’s Best Electronics & Electrical Engineering Scientists Ranking
Which countries are strongest in electronics and electrical engineering research?
The ranking shows a clear concentration of research strength in the United States, but it also reveals a more globally distributed elite group at the very top. That matters because a country with many ranked scientists may offer a broad research ecosystem, while a country with fewer overall entries can still host standout labs and globally influential scholars.
The United States led the field with 468 scientists, which was two more than the previous year. China remained in second place with 113 scientists. Canada and the United Kingdom tied with 53 each, though the United Kingdom moved down one position from 2022.
Other countries with meaningful representation included Japan with 33 scientists, Australia with 32, Switzerland with 28, Italy with 26, South Korea with 24, and Singapore with 23. Canada moved up from fourth place in 2022 to third place in 2023, while Switzerland entered the top 1% group in 7th place, replacing Germany.
The country assigned to each scientist reflects the researcher’s affiliated institution according to MAG, not necessarily the scientist’s nationality.
| Country | Ranked scientists | Share or ranking detail |
| United States | 468 | 46.8% of the full ranking |
| China | 113 | 11.3% of the full ranking |
| Canada | 53 | 5.3% of the full ranking |
| United Kingdom | 53 | 5.3% of the full ranking |
| Japan | 33 | 3.3% of the full ranking |
| Australia | 32 | 3.2% of the full ranking |
| Switzerland | 28 | 2.8% of the full ranking |
Which institutions stand out most?
Institutional concentration is another important signal. A university with many ranked scientists usually has research depth, broad lab activity, and a stronger likelihood of offering multiple entry points for graduate students and collaborators.
MIT ranked first with 28 scientists, followed by Stanford University with 27 and the University of California-Berkeley with 24. Among the top 10 institutions, 7 were American universities, 2 were in Switzerland, and 1 was in Singapore.
In the top 1% group, 4 out of 10 institutions were based in the U.S. The remaining institutions represented Denmark, Australia, China, Singapore, Canada, and Japan. Among the top 20 institutions, 13 were U.S.-based universities, alongside strong showings from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, ETH Zurich, the National University of Singapore, the City University of Hong Kong, Southeast University, KU Leuven, and the University of Toronto.
| Institution signal | What it suggests | What to check next |
| Many ranked scientists | The university has visible depth in the discipline. | Whether those scholars work in your exact subfield. |
| Strong top 1% presence | The institution may have globally recognized research leadership. | Whether the specific lab or program you want is equally strong. |
| Repeated country representation | The region may have a strong collaboration network. | Visa rules, research funding, cost of living, and language requirements. |
| Appearance across several rankings | The institution may sustain long-term productivity. | Student outcomes, funding levels, and project availability. |
How to interpret D-index, h-index, and other ranking signals
The ranking uses discipline-focused bibliometric measures, which are helpful because they make comparisons more relevant to electronics and electrical engineering instead of general academic output. The D-index filters for field relevance, while the h-index and publication and citation counts help show how widely a scientist’s work has been read and used.
These numbers are useful, but they do not tell the whole story. A highly cited scholar may not be the best match for your specific topic, and a newer researcher may be doing excellent work in an emerging niche that has not yet built a large citation record.
| Metric | What it can tell you | Limitations |
| D-index | How strongly a scholar is associated with the discipline. | Does not fully capture teaching, mentoring, or practical impact. |
| h-index | Broad citation influence across a researcher’s publication record. | Can favor older careers and established fields. |
| Publication count | Research volume and output activity. | Quantity does not always mean quality or relevance. |
| Citation count | How often a scholar’s work is used by others. | Self-citations, field size, and publication age can affect it. |
Can certificates help build relevant skills?
Yes, but only for the right purpose. Short certificate programs can help graduate students, early-career researchers, and technical professionals build focused skills in areas like data analysis, embedded systems, power electronics, battery technology, renewable energy systems, technical writing, or research computing.
Certificates are best viewed as skill boosters, not substitutes for an engineering degree when a role requires one. They are most useful when you need to close a specific skills gap, prepare for a project, or strengthen your technical profile without committing to a longer program. Students exploring flexible starting points may want to look at easy online certificate programs.
Education paths that can lead into the field
Not every electronics or electrical engineering career starts with the same credential. Research-heavy roles usually require graduate study, while technician, manufacturing, installation, maintenance, and support roles may be accessible through associate degrees, trade programs, apprenticeships, or industry certifications.
For students who want a faster entry into hands-on work, career training can be a smart first step before deciding on a bachelor’s or graduate degree. Some learners may find trades after high school especially relevant for electrical systems, industrial technology, renewable energy installation, or electronics support.
When an accelerated associate degree makes sense
An accelerated associate degree can work well for students who want a quicker path into technician-level employment, a bridge into a bachelor’s degree, or a low-risk way to test whether they enjoy the field before investing in a longer program.
That said, speed should not come at the expense of quality. A program should still provide solid lab exposure, relevant coursework, transfer-friendly policies, and recognized accreditation. Students comparing compact formats can review options such as a 6 month associate degree online while making sure the curriculum supports their actual career goal.
Online and hybrid learning in engineering
Online and hybrid formats have made it easier to access coursework, seminars, simulation tools, and collaborative learning across locations. For working adults and remote students, this can be a practical way to continue studying while staying employed or participating in distributed research teams.
Still, electronics and electrical engineering remain hands-on disciplines. Before enrolling, students should ask how the program handles lab access, hardware projects, internships, faculty interaction, and research participation. A program that looks flexible on paper may be too weak in practical training if those pieces are missing.
Cross-university collaboration also continues to drive innovation. For example, MIT and Brown University unlocked dendrite formation in lithium batteries, a finding tied to safer and more effective energy storage research.
Do shorter doctoral programs make sense?
They can, but only for the right student. Doctoral study is usually the path for people who want to lead original research, teach at the university level, or work in advanced research and development. Shorter doctoral formats may fit experienced professionals who already have a focused research plan, prior graduate training, or employer support.
The main trade-off is that faster completion should never replace strong supervision, research infrastructure, or topic fit. Before choosing any accelerated option, make sure the program supports publishing, dissertation work, and the technical resources your project needs. Readers comparing time-efficient pathways can review PhD programs while confirming that the research model suits engineering work.
How undergraduate study builds a foundation for innovation
A strong bachelor’s degree can prepare students for design work, lab assignments, internships, graduate school, and entry-level technical roles. The most valuable programs usually emphasize mathematics, physics, circuits, electronics, programming, signals, controls, communications, power systems, and capstone projects.
Research experience and internships are especially important because they teach students how to apply theory to real systems. If you are comparing broader earning potential across majors, you can also review bachelor degrees that make the most money, while keeping in mind that outcomes vary by location, employer, and specialization.
How the ranking can inform career planning
Electronics and electrical engineering research feeds directly into careers in semiconductor design, power systems, electric vehicles, renewable energy, robotics, telecommunications, embedded systems, automation, battery technology, and digital infrastructure. The best pathway depends on the job you want, how quickly you want to enter the field, and how much specialization you are willing to pursue.
It is a mistake to choose a major only because it sounds lucrative. A better decision starts with the work itself: what tools you want to use, what problems you want to solve, and what region or industry you want to work in. If you are weighing long-term return on investment across majors, Research.com’s guide to the best degrees to make money can serve as one comparison point.
How to evaluate a ranking before using it in a real decision
Before you use a scientist ranking to choose a supervisor, institution, or topic, compare it with other evidence that better reflects your goals.
- Check topical match. Read the scientist’s recent work, not just the ranking position.
- Look at current activity. A strong citation record does not always mean the researcher is active in your area right now.
- Compare by subfield. A university may be excellent in power electronics but less relevant for semiconductors, communications, or robotics.
- Review program requirements. Admissions standards, lab expectations, thesis rules, and graduation milestones all matter.
- Verify accreditation. Rankings do not replace program-level quality checks for degrees or licensure-related study.
- Estimate total cost. A prestigious institution is not automatically the best option if funding and living costs are unrealistic.
Common mistakes readers make when using scientist rankings
| Mistake | Why it causes problems | Better way to decide |
| Picking a school only because it appears on the list | The strongest researcher may not supervise your topic or accept new students. | Confirm faculty availability and research fit first. |
| Treating citations as the only sign of quality | Citation data does not fully measure mentoring, teaching, or applied impact. | Use multiple indicators, including funding, patents, and student outcomes. |
| Ignoring accreditation and degree structure | A strong research environment does not guarantee a suitable degree path. | Check institutional and program-level accreditation and requirements. |
| Overvaluing global rank | The best option for you may be a specialized lab outside the very top institutions. | Prioritize supervision, resources, and subfield match. |
| Assuming salary outcomes are certain | Compensation varies by location, experience, industry, and timing. | Study job postings, internships, and local market demand. |
Questions to ask before contacting a professor or applying to a program
- Does this researcher publish in my exact subfield?
- Are they currently taking students, postdocs, or collaborators?
- Does the department have the lab equipment, datasets, or partners my work needs?
- How are students funded, supervised, and supported through milestones?
- Does the program work for full-time, part-time, online, hybrid, or campus study?
- What are the total costs, and what scholarships, grants, or assistantships are available?
- Where do graduates usually go after finishing the program?
Methodology and source notes
The 2023 ranking reviewed more than 10,355 scientist profiles and used discipline-specific indicators to decide who qualified. To be considered, scholars needed a D-index of at least 30 if most of their publications were in electronics and electrical engineering. The methodology also looked at each scholar’s share of work in the discipline, along with awards and achievements.
You can review the ranking methodology and criteria here.
D-index ranking: regional leaders, averages, and distribution
Regional leaders give another useful way to read the ranking. They show where exceptional researchers are clustered and how the field extends beyond the highest-ranked institutions in the United States.
Professor Frede Blaabjerg of Aalborg University is the top-ranked researcher in Europe and also ranks first globally with an H-index of 176. Professor Peng Shi of the University of Adelaide leads Oceania and ranks second worldwide with an H-index of 157. Professor Guanrong Chen of the City University of Hong Kong leads Asia and ranks third globally with an H-index of 155.
In North America, Professor Stephen R. Forrest of the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor is the regional leader and ranks 5th globally with an H-index of 152. Professor Jose Rodriguez of Andrés Bello University is the top-ranked scientist in South America, with a world ranking of 71. Professor Qing-Guo Wang of the University of Johannesburg is the highest-ranked scientist in South Africa, with a world ranking of 489.
The top 1% of scientists had an average H-index of 151.7, compared with 75.61 for all ranked scientists. The lowest H-index in the ranking was 59. The top 1% also had an average of 1458 electronics-related published articles, compared with 512 for all ranked scholars, and an average citation count of (97,493), compared with (25,752) for the full group.
| Regional leader | Institution | Region | Ranking detail |
| Professor Frede Blaabjerg | Aalborg University | Europe | Global rank 1; H-index 176 |
| Professor Peng Shi | University of Adelaide | Oceania | Global rank 2; H-index 157 |
| Professor Guanrong Chen | City University of Hong Kong | Asia | Global rank 3; H-index 155 |
| Professor Stephen R. Forrest | University of Michigan-Ann Arbor | North America | Global rank 5; H-index 152 |
| Professor Jose Rodriguez | Andrés Bello University | South America | World ranking 71 |
| Professor Qing-Guo Wang | University of Johannesburg | South Africa | World ranking 489 |
How to use certificate and degree pathways strategically
If you are early in your education, the right path depends on how quickly you need employable skills and whether your target role requires a degree. Certificates can sharpen a specific skill set, while associate degrees, bachelor’s degrees, and graduate programs each serve different career goals.
The safest approach is to match the credential to the job. If you want research leadership, you will need a stronger academic pathway. If you want hands-on technical work, a shorter credential may be enough. If you want flexibility, look closely at transfer policies, lab access, and whether the program is built for working adults or full-time students.
Key insights
- The 2023 Research.com ranking is best used as a research map, not as a simple popularity contest.
- The United States has the strongest overall presence, but top-tier researchers are spread across multiple countries, including Denmark, Australia, China, Singapore, Canada, and Japan.
- MIT leads institutions with 28 ranked scientists, while Professor Frede Blaabjerg of Aalborg University ranks first globally with an H-index of 176.
- Bibliometric data helps identify influence, but it does not replace research fit, supervision quality, funding, accreditation, or career alignment.
- Students and professionals should use the ranking to narrow options, then verify program structure, lab resources, cost, and outcomes before making a decision.
- The best path in electronics and electrical engineering is the one that matches your technical interests, desired role, and access to real research or hands-on training.
About Research.com
All research was coordinated by Imed Bouchrika, Ph.D., a computer scientist with extensive experience collaborating on international research projects across the academic community. His role was to help ensure that the data remained unbiased, accurate, and up to date.
Research.com is a research portal for science and educational rankings. Its mission is to help professors, research fellows, and students advance their work and identify leading experts across scientific disciplines. Research.com also supports students by providing information on colleges, academic opportunities, and career pathways.
