0081-9557
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law | 45 | 11 | 10 | 3 |
The scientific interests tackled in Supreme Court Review are Law, Supreme court, Law and economics, Doctrine and Constitution. The journal concentrates on Law topics that focus on First amendment, Statute, Economic Justice, Politics and Constitutional law. The journal explores topics in Supreme court which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Jurisprudence and State (polity).
The journal papers aim to foster the development of research in Law, Supreme court, First amendment, Politics and Constitution. The journal publications explore research in Law alongside concepts in Criminology and other areas of study in Context (language use). The most cited articles focus on Supreme court but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Administrative law, Jurisprudence, Affirmative action and Yankee.
The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Supreme court, Law and economics, Law, Economic Justice and Jurisprudence. It focuses on Supreme court as well as the interrelated topic of Judicial review. The Law and economics research presented in the journal explores the relationship between State (polity) and the closely related topic of Adversary, Government, Appeasement, Compromise and Establishment Clause.
Civil society, Opposition (politics), Trademark, Resentment and White supremacy are Law topics of special interest in Supreme Court Review. The Economic Justice works featured in Supreme Court Review incorporate elements from Aside, Norm (philosophy), Criminology and Discretion. Supreme Court Review facilitates discussions on Jurisprudence that incorporate concepts from other fields like Administrative law, Bureaucracy, Common law and Originalism.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Supreme Court Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Supreme Court Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2020 edition, 100.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, nan% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another nan% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included nan% of all publications and nan% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Cass R. Sunstein;Adrian Vermeule
(2021)Reva B. Siegel
(2021)
