| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 501 | 41 | 47 | 16 |
| Engineering and Technology | 523 | 33 | 54 | 16 |
The journal mainly tackles studies in Industrial chemistry, Chemical engineering, Process (engineering), Process engineering and Nanotechnology. Studies in Industrial chemistry and Waste management are the key highlights in Reviews in Chemical Engineering. Membrane, Catalysis and Adsorption are some topics wherein Chemical engineering research discussed in Reviews in Chemical Engineering have an impact.
The most cited publications investigate areas of study like Industrial chemistry, Chemical engineering, Process engineering, Process (engineering) and Mechanics. The published articles focus on Chemical engineering but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Adsorption, Polymer, Membrane, Catalysis and Carbon dioxide. The most cited articles explore topics in Process (engineering) which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Rheology, Manufacturing engineering, Biochar and Scale (chemistry).
The journal aims to foster the development of research in Industrial chemistry, Process (engineering), Chemical engineering, Catalysis and Process engineering. Reviews in Chemical Engineering aims to form a more comprehensive understanding of the field by integrating Industrial chemistry with subjects such as Mass transfer, Fluidized bed, Nuclear engineering, Adsorption and Biochar. The concepts on Process (engineering) presented in it can also apply to other research fields, including Microreactor, Biochemical engineering, Engineering physics and Petroleum engineering.
Some problems in Chemical engineering that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Rheology, Polymer, Membrane, Aqueous solution and Nonmetal. The work on Catalysis tackled in Reviews in Chemical Engineering brings together disciplines like Carbon dioxide and Thermodynamics. Reviews in Chemical Engineering facilitates discussions on Process engineering that incorporate concepts from other fields like Oil refinery, Petrochemistry, Optimal control and Supercritical fluid.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Reviews in Chemical Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Reviews in Chemical Engineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 19.05% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 29.41% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.84% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.69% of all publications and 47.06% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Fariborz Faraji;Fariborz Faraji;Amirhossein Alizadeh;Fereshteh Rashchi;Navid Mostoufi
(2020)Juan C. Ruiz-Cornejo;David Sebastián;María Jesús Lázaro
(2020)Robina Begum;Jawayria Najeeb;Ayesha Sattar;Khalida Naseem
(2020)Pinaki Dey;Parimal Pal;Joseph Dilip Kevin;Diganta Bhusan Das
(2020)Farrukh Jamil;Muhammad Aslam;Ala’a H. Al-Muhtaseb;Awais Bokhari
(2020)Somayeh Sohrabi;Mostafa Keshavarz Moraveji;Davood Iranshahi
(2020)Peter Adeniyi Alaba;Ching Shya Lee;Faisal Abnisa;Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua;Mohamed Kheireddine Aroua
(2021)Guoqiang Li;Wojciech Kujawski;Wojciech Kujawski;Edyta Rynkowska
(2020)For students pursuing Chemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects significantly. Programs like is medical billing and coding in demand highlight the growing healthcare industry's need for professionals who blend scientific knowledge with administrative skills.
Similarly, for those interested in healthcare alongside chemistry, accredited nursing programs such as rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited offer flexible online pathways to advance careers without the need for extensive clinical hours. This flexibility helps accommodate working professionals seeking further education.
For advanced practitioners, focusing on specialized roles is crucial. The availability of short dnp programs provides an accelerated route to doctorate-level nursing practice, integrating scientific principles and clinical expertise, which can complement a chemistry background.
If rapid entry into healthcare is preferred, an accelerated cma program offers an efficient way to start a career as a certified medical assistant, leveraging both chemistry knowledge and practical skills in a fast-paced environment.
