1389-5575
Published by: Bentham Science
https://benthamscience.com/journals/mini-reviews-in-medicinal-chemistry/
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 623 | 32 | 42 | 12 |
| Medicine | 2301 | 11 | 24 | 11 |
The objective of Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry is to combine knowledge in the areas of Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Drug, Combinatorial chemistry and Cancer research. Some problems in Pharmacology that were presented in the journal overlapped with concepts under Receptor, Disease, In vivo and Drug discovery. Enzyme, Structure–activity relationship and Antioxidant are some of the study areas of Biochemistry discussed.
The in-depth study on Cancer research also explores topics in the intersecting field of Cancer. The Cancer study tackling the subject of Cancer cell is the focus of it.
The published articles investigate studies in Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Structure–activity relationship, Combinatorial chemistry and Stereochemistry. The Pharmacology research presented in the most cited publications focuses mostly on Cancer research and, on occasion, topics in Carcinogenesis. Aside from discussions in Biochemistry, the most cited publications also deal with the subject of In vivo which intersects with In vitro disciplines.
Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry generally zeroes in on subjects such as Pharmacology, Drug, Traditional medicine, Disease and Combinatorial chemistry. While Pharmacology is the key highlight in it, it also covered some subjects on Diabetes mellitus and Insulin. The studies on Disease discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Clinical trial, Neuroscience and Intensive care medicine.
Some problems in Combinatorial chemistry that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Mechanism of action, Moiety, Pharmacophore, Biological activity and Drug discovery. The journal explores research in Antimicrobial and overlapping concepts in Biochemistry to expand the discourse in Biological activity. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Drug discovery, it also covered topics in Cancer and Computational biology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Mini-reviews in Medicinal Chemistry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 11.20% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 5.61% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.67% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.89% of all publications and 73.83% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Shilpi Srivastava;Zeba Usmani;Atanas G Atanasov;Vinod Kumar Singh
(2021)Hulya Akıncıoğlu;İlhami Gülçin
(2020)Annalise R. Pfaff;Justin Beltz;Emily King;Nuran Ercal
(2020)Hamidreza Ardalani;Amin Hadipanah;Amirhossein Sahebkar
(2020)Hiwa M Ahmed;Seyed Nabavi;Sahar Behzad
(2021)Saba Zafar;Iqra Sarfraz;Azhar Rasul;Muhammad Ajmal Shah
(2021)Abhinay Thakur;Rohit Sharma;Vivek Sheel Jaswal;Eugenie Nepovimova
(2020)Esmaeil Sheikh Ahmadi;Amir Tajbakhsh;Milad Iranshahy;Javad Asili
(2020)İrem Bozbey;Zeynep Özdemir;Harun Uslu;Azime Berna Özçelik
(2020)Xu Hu;Yan Wang;Xiang Gao;Shengtao Xu
(2020)For those interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can provide flexible and accelerated options to advance your healthcare career. For instance, non-nurses looking to enter the nursing field can consider direct entry MSN programs for non nurses online, which offer a direct route to a Master of Science in Nursing without prior nursing experience.
Registered Nurses aiming to deepen their expertise must choose between top programs like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn, which provide online pathways tailored to different schedules and learning preferences.
Further academic progression is possible through rn to bsn to msn online programs. These programs help bridge the gap between undergraduate and graduate nursing degrees at an affordable cost, enhancing career prospects in advanced practice or leadership roles.
Notably, many students seek convenience without compromising on quality. rn to bsn programs with no clinicals offer flexible options that reduce in-person requirements, ideal for working professionals balancing education with personal commitments.