| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunology | 92 | 68 | 100 | 18 |
| Medicine | 1108 | 130 | 178 | 21 |
The foci of the journal are Immunology, Internal medicine, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Lupus erythematosus and Antibody. The Immunology study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Disease. Many of the research works in Internal medicine, specifically Lupus nephritis, closely connected to disciplines like In patient.
While Lupus nephritis is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Cyclophosphamide, Nephritis and Proteinuria. The journal explores topics in Systemic lupus erythematosus which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Surgery, Pediatrics, Cohort and Rheumatology. In Lupus, MEDLINE, Dermatology, Retrospective cohort study, Pathology and Severity of illness are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Lupus erythematosus research.
While work presented in it provided substantial information on Antibody, it also covered topics in Molecular biology and Antigen. The work on Antiphospholipid syndrome addressed in Lupus expands to the thematically related Lupus anticoagulant. Lupus focuses on Pregnancy research which is adjacent to topics in Obstetrics.
The journal articles generally zeroe in on subjects such as Immunology, Internal medicine, Lupus erythematosus, Systemic lupus erythematosus and Antibody. While the most cited papers focused on Immunology, they were also able to explore topics like Lupus nephritis and Disease. The most cited papers hold forums on Internal medicine that merge themes from other disciplines such as Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgery.
Lupus investigates studies in Internal medicine, Immunology, In patient, Dermatology and Systemic lupus erythematosus. Gastroenterology and Cardiology are some topics wherein Internal medicine research discussed in it have an impact. It holds forums on Immunology that merges themes from other disciplines such as Disease activity and Lupus nephritis.
The journal tackles research works in In patient as well as Cohort study. It explores issues in Dermatology which can be linked to other research areas like Lupus erythematosus and Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. It deals with Systemic lupus erythematosus in conjunction with Pediatrics and similar fields in Cohort.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Lupus (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Lupus (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.47% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 14.46% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 4.55% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.22% of all publications and 67.77% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Hannah Cohen;Hannah Cohen;Maria J Cuadrado;Doruk Erkan;Ali Duarte-Garcia
(2020)Anadi Mahajan;Justyna Amelio;Kerry Gairy;Gavneet Kaur
(2020)Roger A Levy;Tania Gonzalez-Rivera;Munther Khamashta;Norma Lynn Fox
(2021)J S Massias;E M D Smith;E Al-Abadi;K Armon
(2020)Richard Furie;Eric F Morand;Anca D Askanase;Edward M Vital;Edward M Vital
(2021)D Nikolopoulos;D Nikolopoulos;M Kostopoulou;A Pieta;T Karageorgas
(2020)For those interested in expanding their healthcare expertise beyond traditional medical routes, several online degrees offer valuable opportunities. Programs that hold cahme accreditation for mha programs provide top-tier education in healthcare management, preparing students for leadership roles in hospitals and health systems.
Advanced clinical practice is also accessible through various digital platforms. Many students pursue online dnp programs that do not require clinical hours, offering flexibility without sacrificing rigorous training for nurse practitioners and clinical leaders.
For those inclined toward research and administrative excellence, a phd in healthcare management can open doors to high-level strategic roles and academic positions in the healthcare sector.
Pharmacy professionals can also enhance their credentials through an online pharmd program, which offers extensive training in pharmaceutical sciences and patient care in a flexible, remote format.
