| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 418 | 27 | 46 | 10 |
The discussions in Hastings Center Report mainly cover the fields of Law, Bioethics, Health care, Social psychology and Environmental ethics. Presentations on Law include those discussing Supreme court, Legislation, Politics, Government and Medical ethics. Hastings Center Report explores issues in Health care which can be linked to other research areas like Nursing and Public relations.
The published papers generally zeroe in on subjects such as Law, Health care, Bioethics, Social psychology and Informed consent. While work presented in the journal papers provide substantial information on Law, it also covers topics in Environmental ethics and Meaning (existential). The studies on Health care discussed at the most cited publications can also contribute to research in the domains of Nursing, Psychiatry, Actuarial science and Public relations.
The main research concerns discussed in Hastings Center Report are Bioethics, Health care, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Pandemic and Public relations. Race (biology), Health policy, Environmental ethics, Racism and Scarcity are some topics wherein Bioethics research discussed in it have an impact. The journal focuses on Scarcity but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Politics, Resource allocation, Harm and Public health.
Research in Accountability and the interrelating topic of Element (criminal law) were among the subjects of interest in the Health care studies discussed in it. The studies in Pandemic featured incorporate elements of Nursing, Law and economics, Triage and Set (psychology). The studies on Public relations discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Empirical research, Face (sociological concept), Democracy and Value (ethics).
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Hastings Center Report (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Hastings Center Report (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 92.41% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.67% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 50.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Leveraging the insights from Hastings Center Report equips readers not only with the knowledge necessary to understand complex ethical concepts, but also with the potential to explore exciting career opportunities within these fields. For instance, many contributors and readers of the journal have been inspired to pursue careers in counseling, specifically as licensed professional counselors (LPC).
Becoming a LPC involves fulfilling specialized educational and licensing requirements which vary from state to state. For instance, the LPC requirements in Delaware include obtaining a master's degree in counseling, completing a certain number of supervised practice hours, and achieving a passing score on the National Counselor Examination.
It is important to note that the fields covered by the Hastings Center Report offer a broad range of career opportunities beyond counseling, such as roles in law, health care administration, public relations, environmental conservation, and so on. Therefore, the acquisition and application of knowledge from this esteemed journal truly creates a powerful platform that can lead to impactful careers.
Georgina Morley;Christine Grady;Joan McCarthy;Connie M. Ulrich
(2020)Nicole Martinez-Martin;Sarah Wieten;David Magnus;Mildred K. Cho
(2020)Laura Guidry-Grimes;Katie Savin;Joseph A. Stramondo;Joel Michael Reynolds
(2020)Marielle S. Gross;Bryna J. Harrington;Carolyn B. Sufrin;Ruth R. Faden
(2020)Mildred Z. Solomon;Matthew Wynia;Lawrence O. Gostin
(2020)Kirstin R. W. Matthews;Ana S. Iltis;Nuria Gallego Marquez;Daniel S. Wagner
(2021)For students pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA, a variety of online degrees offer flexible pathways to enhance knowledge and career prospects. Many learners are attracted to most affordable online interdisciplinary studies programs, which allow a customized curriculum blending multiple disciplines. This flexibility is ideal for those seeking broad expertise applicable in diverse fields.
For history enthusiasts, pursuing an online masters history programs is a popular choice. These programs provide deep understanding of historical contexts while accommodating working professionals through remote study.
Library and information science also aligns closely with humanities studies, with many opting to pursue a Master of Library and Information Science (MLIS). Considering the mlis degree cost is important for budgeting, especially for those balancing finances and education.
Additionally, communication-focused students may explore career changes through online slp programs, which offer bridge routes for non-SLP majors. These programs open doors to speech-language pathology, emphasizing practical skills and certification readiness.
