| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law | 54 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 699 | 16 | 15 | 7 |
The journal covers a variety of subjects, including Criminology, Law, Social psychology, Criminal justice and Prison. The journal tackles research in Justice (ethics) as part of the general discipline of Criminology, however, it also discusses concepts in Human factors and ergonomics and Suicide prevention. The journal held discussions to help close the divide between two different fields of study: Human factors and ergonomics and Sex offender.
The research topics discussed in Criminal Justice Policy Review include Sex offender as well as Injury prevention. Presentations on Law include those discussing Law enforcement, Supreme court, Legislation, Criminal justice policy and Economic Justice. Issues in Criminal justice were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Psychiatry and Public administration.
The most cited papers generally zeroe in on subjects such as Criminology, Human factors and ergonomics, Suicide prevention, Social psychology and Occupational safety and health. Sentence, Law and Race (biology) are some topics wherein Criminology research discussed in the journal papers has an impact. The published papers focus on Social psychology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Test (assessment), Justice (ethics) and Ethnic group.
Criminal Justice Policy Review explores disciplines such as Criminology, Prison, Recidivism, State (polity) and Juvenile. The subject of Public opinion, which is connected to the field of Sex offender and Militarization, serves as the foundation of the Criminology research featured in it. Criminal Justice Policy Review focuses on Prison but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Physical health and Gerontology.
Recidivism research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Conviction, Natural experiment, Program evaluation, Administration of justice and Scholarship. It focuses on Juvenile but sometimes tackles the closely related topic of Justice (ethics) which is concerned with Public administration, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile court and Crime reduction. The featured Race (biology) studies mainly concentrate on Sentence but also cover areas of interest in Law.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Criminal Justice Policy Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Criminal Justice Policy Review (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 6.67% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 26.79% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.71% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 30.36% of all publications and 32.14% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Richard Rosenfeld;Thaddeus L. Johnson;Richard Wright
(2020)Alexander Testa;Brian D. Johnson
(2020)Ryan M. Labrecque;Daniel P. Mears;Paula Smith
(2020)James Frank;Eric G. Lambert;Hanif Qureshi;Andrew J. Myer
(2020)Logan J. Somers;William Terrill;Michael T. Rossler;Jason R. Ingram
(2020)Steven N. Zane;Simon I. Singer;Brandon C. Welsh
(2021)Lin Liu;Christy A. Visher;Dayu Sun
(2021)Stephen V. Gies;Nicole Leeper Piquero;Alex R. Piquero;Alex R. Piquero;Brandn Green
(2021)For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond psychology, pursuing online schools for human services can offer a flexible and accessible path. These programs focus on providing essential skills in social support and community resources, often with shorter completion times to accommodate working professionals.
Many educators consider transitioning careers, and the pathway from teacher to slp (speech-language pathologist) is a popular option. This career change leverages strong communication skills and a passion for helping others, requiring specific training and certification.
When choosing an advanced degree in speech-language pathology, it’s crucial to select programs that meet professional standards. The asha approved slp programs online ensure that graduates are eligible for certification and licensure, balancing speed with quality education.
For individuals without a prior speech-language pathology background, slp bridge program online options provide a structured pathway to enter the field. These bridge programs help non-SLP majors transition efficiently by covering prerequisite knowledge and clinical skills.
