Clinical Biochemistry

Top Research Topics at Clinical Biochemistry?

The journal primarily tackles Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Chromatography, Biochemistry and Gastroenterology. While the journal primarily focused on Internal medicine, it also opened dialogues on the discipline of In patient. Oxidative stress and Cholesterol are all topics related to Endocrinology research discussed.

The studies in Chromatography featured incorporate elements of Immunoassay, Urine and Analytical chemistry. The majority of Biochemistry studies are focused on the issues of Enzyme. Myocardial infarction is a focus of the Cardiology works in Clinical Biochemistry.

• Internal medicine (35.98%)
• Endocrinology (21.65%)
• Chromatography (16.21%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. (1856 citations)
• A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable ABTS radical cation (1656 citations)
• ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES AND HUMAN DISEASES (1643 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Clinical Biochemistry:

The journal publications cover a variety of subjects, including Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Chromatography, Biochemistry and Immunology. The studies on Internal medicine discussed at the journal papers can also contribute to research in the domains of Gastroenterology, Diabetes mellitus and Antioxidant. While the published articles focused on Chromatography, they were also able to explore topics like Immunoassay and Analytical chemistry.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Enzyme
• Gene

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Clinical Biochemistry tackles a plethora of topics, such as Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Chromatography, In patient and Endocrinology. The presented research on Internal medicine deals specifically with Cardiology but it also addresses topics in Quartile. Many of the studies tackled connect Gastroenterology with a similar field of study like Kidney.

Chromatography and Immunoassay are closely related fields of research discussed in Clinical Biochemistry. Studies in In patient were the highlight in Clinical Biochemistry but it also discussed other topics like Emergency department, Myocardial infarction and Retrospective cohort study. Oxidative stress is a major topic of Endocrinology research presented in Clinical Biochemistry.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• CRISPR-based tools: Alternative methods for the diagnosis of COVID-19. (12 citations)
• Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM improves clinical sensitivity early in disease course. (4 citations)
• Increased oxidative stress and inflammatory markers contrasting with the activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in patients with metabolic syndrome (4 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Clinical Biochemistry (based on the number of publications) are:

• Eleftherios P. Diamandis (108 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Khosrow Adeli (102 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Peter A. Kavsak (82 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Giuseppe Lippi (53 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 3 less than at the previous edition,
• Mario Plebani (50 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Clinical Biochemistry (based on the number of publications) are:

• University of Toronto (376 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
• McMaster University (174 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (166 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Boston Children's Hospital (140 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• University of British Columbia (131 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 10.24% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 24.16% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.04% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.07% of all publications and 59.73% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Career Development Opportunities in Clinical Biochemistry

As the field of Clinical Biochemistry continues to evolve, it's essential for researchers and practitioners to stay current with the latest training and advancement opportunities. Job prospects and advancements are particularly promising for those with advanced degrees in this field. You may want to consider furthering your education to improve your skills and enhance your career prospects. One way to do it is to take a nurse practitioner program. For instance, the best nurse practitioner programs in Florida can provide comprehensive training in a variety of fields, including Clinical Biochemistry. Participating in these programs can offer in-depth knowledge and expertise in clinical practice, research, and healthcare leadership. Regardless of your status - whether you're a student, a professional looking to specialize, or considering a career shift into Clinical Biochemistry - educational advancement can provide a pivotal stepping stone towards achieving your career goals. Remember, success in Clinical Biochemistry requires continuous learning and professional development. Keep abreast with emerging trends, latest publications, and advanced training opportunities in your field.