| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunology | 21 | 136 | 215 | 45 |
| Medicine | 279 | 198 | 270 | 46 |
The objective of Autoimmunity Reviews is to combine knowledge in the areas of Immunology, Autoimmunity, Internal medicine, Disease and Autoantibody. Presentations on Immunology include those discussing Immune system, Autoimmune disease, Antibody, Pathogenesis and Rheumatoid arthritis. The studies in Immune system featured incorporate elements of Inflammation and Antigen.
Autoimmunity Reviews dives deep in exploring the relationship between the study of Rheumatoid arthritis and Arthritis. It explores topics in Internal medicine which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgery. Most of the works presented in the journal deals with Autoantibody but it intersects with the subject of Pathology.
Vasculitis is the primary subject of Pathology works presented in it.
The most cited publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Immunology, Autoimmunity, Immune system, Disease and Autoantibody. Immunology studies presented in the most cited papers include Autoimmune disease, Inflammation, Rheumatoid arthritis, Pathogenesis and Antibody. The journal articles explore research in Pathology and overlapping concepts in Gastroenterology to expand the discourse in Autoantibody.
The main research concerns discussed in Autoimmunity Reviews are Immunology, Internal medicine, Autoimmunity, Disease and Immune system. Autoimmunity Reviews connects research in Immunology with the related topic of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Topics in Internal medicine explored in the journal were investigated in conjunction with research in Gastroenterology and MEDLINE.
In Autoimmunity Reviews, Phenotype, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Molecular mimicry and Effector are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Autoimmunity research. The study on Disease presented in Autoimmunity Reviews intersects with the topics under Rheumatoid arthritis. Multiple sclerosis, B cell, Antigen and Bioinformatics are some topics wherein Immune system research discussed in Autoimmunity Reviews have an impact.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Autoimmunity Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Autoimmunity Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 7.51% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 9.38% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.25% of all publications and 54.37% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Dennis McGonagle;Dennis McGonagle;Kassem Sharif;Anthony O'Regan;Charlie Bridgewood
(2020)Paola Toniati;Simone Piva;Marco Cattalini;Emirena Garrafa
(2020)Yvan Jamilloux;Yvan Jamilloux;Thomas Henry;Alexandre Belot;Sébastien Viel
(2020)Michael Ehrenfeld;Angela Tincani;Laura Andreoli;Marco Cattalini
(2020)Manuel Rojas;Yhojan Rodríguez;Diana M. Monsalve;Yeny Acosta-Ampudia
(2020)Ennio Giulio Favalli;Francesca Ingegnoli;Orazio De Lucia;Gilberto Cincinelli
(2020)Arad Dotan;Sylviane Muller;Darja Kanduc;Paula David
(2021)For those interested in expanding their medical knowledge or entering healthcare quickly, exploring a fast track medical LPN program online can be a practical option. These programs provide accelerated training that prepares students for licensed practical nursing roles, bridging the gap between education and employment efficiently.
Further advancing in healthcare often involves pursuing higher degrees like online nursing doctoral programs. These programs offer flexible learning while equipping nurses with leadership, research, and advanced clinical skills necessary for specialized roles and career growth.
For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, earning credentials from medical billing and coding online schools is a valuable pathway. Graduates can contribute to efficient healthcare operations by managing patient data and insurance processes, crucial for the financial sustainability of medical facilities.
Individuals with a background in biology should also consider exploring high paying jobs with a biology degree. These careers span beyond traditional roles, offering diverse opportunities in research, healthcare, and technology fields that complement medical studies well.
