World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Keith L. Williams

Keith L. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
28017
World Ranking
11666
National Ranking
320

Keith L. Williams publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith L. Williams sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 249 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Keith L. Williams D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith L. Williams sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith L. Williams is affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the environmental sciences, with specific attention to topics related to fish ecology, marine animals, and fisheries research.

The scientist's work spans several fields and subfields, including:

  • Environmental Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Marine and fisheries research

Recent publications by Keith L. Williams have appeared mainly in the Journal of Fish Biology. Notable papers include:

  • Determinants of riverine migration success by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts from rivers across the UK and Ireland, 2024, Journal of Fish Biology
  • Inshore marine coastal zone migration patterns in Atlantic salmon post-smolts emigrating from eight rivers in north-east Scotland, 2025, Journal of Fish Biology

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including:

  • Jessica R. Rodger
  • Hannele M. Honkanen
  • Angus J. Lothian
  • Marcus Walters
  • Brian Shaw

Keith L. Williams's body of work contributes to advancing understanding of fish migration patterns and the environmental factors influencing marine species, positioning them within the broader context of environmental and ecological research linked to aquatic life.

Best Publications

  • Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server

    Marc Wilkins;Elisabeth Gasteiger;Amos Marc Bairoch;Jean Emmanuel Sanchez

  • Progress with Proteome Projects: Why all Proteins Expressed by a Genome Should be Identified and How To Do It

    Marc R. Wilkins;Jean-Charles Sanchez;Andrew A. Gooley;Ron David Appel

  • Progress with gene‐product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium

    Valerie C. Wasinger;Stuart J. Cordwell;Anne Cerpa-Poljak;Anne Cerpa-Poljak;Jun X. Yan

  • From Proteins to Proteomes: Large Scale Protein Identification by Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Amino Acid Analysis

    Marc R. Wilkins;Christian Pasquali;Ron D. Appel;Keli Ou

  • Extraction of membrane proteins by differential solubilization for separation using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

    Mark P. Molloy;Ben R. Herbert;Bradley J. Walsh;Margaret I. Tyler

  • NetOglyc: prediction of mucin type O-glycosylation sites based on sequence context and surface accessibility.

    Jan Erik Hansen;Ole Lund;Niels Tolstrup;Andrew A. Gooley

  • Proteomic analysis of the Escherichia coli outer membrane

    Mark P. Molloy;Ben R. Herbert;Martin B. Slade;Thierry Rabilloud

  • Improved protein solubility in two-dimensional electrophoresis using tributyl phosphine as reducing agent

    Ben R. Herbert;Mark P. Molloy;Andrew A. Gooley;Bradley J. Walsh

  • High-throughput mass spectrometric discovery of protein post-translational modifications.

    Marc Wilkins;Marc Wilkins;Marc Wilkins;Elisabeth Gasteiger;Elisabeth Gasteiger;Andrew A Gooley;Ben R Herbert

  • Effects of Paecilomyces lilacinus protease and chitinase on the eggshell structures and hatching of Meloidogyne javanica juveniles

    Alamgir Khan;Keith Williams;Helena Kaisu Milja Nevalainen

  • Current challenges and future applications for protein maps and post‐translational vector maps in proteome projects

    Marc R. Wilkins;Jean-Charles Sanchez;Keith L. Williams;Denis F. Hochstrasser

  • Proteomics: Capacity versus utility

    Jenny L. Harry;Marc R. Wilkins;Ben R. Herbert;Nicolle H. Packer

  • Protein phosphorylation: technologies for the identification of phosphoamino acids.

    Jun X Yan;Nicolle H Packer;Andrew A Gooley;Keith L Williams

  • Unseen proteome: mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins.

    Susanne K. Pedersen;Jenny L. Harry;Lucille Sebastian;Jasmine Baker

  • Cross-species identification of proteins separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation/time-of-flight mass spectrometry and amino acid composition

    Stuart J. Cordwell;Marc R. Wilkins;Anne Cerpa-Poljak;Andrew A. Gooley

  • Cross-Species Protein Identification using Amino Acid Composition, Peptide Mass Fingerprinting, Isoelectric Point and Molecular Mass: A Theoretical Evaluation

    Marc R. Wilkins;Keith L. Williams

  • Extraction of Escherichia coli proteins with organic solvents prior to two‐dimensional electrophoresis

    Mark P. Molloy;Ben R. Herbert;Keith L. Williams;Andrew A. Gooley

  • The use of a ribosomal RNA targeted oligonucleotide probe for fluorescent labelling of viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

    G. Vesey;N. Ashbolt;E.J. Fricker;D. Deere

  • Application of flow cytometric methods for the routine detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water

    Graham Vesey;Primrose Hutton;Alan Champion;Nicholas Ashbolt

  • Purification and characterization of a serine protease and chitinases from Paecilomyces lilacinus and detection of chitinase activity on 2D gels.

    Alamgir Khan;Keith Williams;Mark P. Molloy;Helena Nevalainen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew A. Gooley
Andrew A. Gooley Trajan Scientific and Medical
Nicolle H. Packer
Nicolle H. Packer Macquarie University
Marc R. Wilkins
Marc R. Wilkins University of New South Wales
Denis F. Hochstrasser
Denis F. Hochstrasser University of Geneva
Jean-Charles Sanchez
Jean-Charles Sanchez University of Geneva
Ron D. Appel
Ron D. Appel Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Amos Marc Bairoch
Amos Marc Bairoch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Pier Giorgio Righetti
Pier Giorgio Righetti Polytechnic University of Milan
Elisabeth Gasteiger
Elisabeth Gasteiger Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Keith L. Williams

Recently Published Articles