The ranking methodology centers on the D-index (Discipline H-index), a discipline-specific variant of the h-index. The D-index exclusively evaluates a researcher’s output and citations within the examined discipline, in this case, Economics and Finance, thereby delivering a focused and relevant measure of scholarly influence.
Scope and Qualification Criteria
This ranking draws upon an extensive examination of 279,971 scientist profiles identified across a diverse array of bibliometric databases covering all academic disciplines. Specifically, 1,987 scientists active in Economics and Finance were carefully evaluated. To qualify for inclusion in the ranking, a scientist must have a D-index of at least 30, with the majority of their tier publications demonstrably centered in the field of Economics and Finance.
Additionally, significant awards and recognitions within Economics and Finance were considered to refine the assessment further. The minimum D-index threshold for top researchers is adjusted in increments of 10, proportional to the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline. This adaptive threshold ensures consistent inclusion of approximately the top 1% of leading experts. Furthermore, to maintain discipline-specific relevance, candidates were required to have a proximity of 30% or less between their general h-index and their D-index, ensuring their primary impact resides within Economics and Finance.
Verification and Validation Practices
Recognizing the limitations inherent in any raw bibliometric dataset, the research team meticulously conducted manual verification of all scientist profiles. This entailed cross-correlation with publications verified in a wide spectrum of trustworthy sources to confirm accuracy and authenticity of data. While not weighted directly in the ranking calculation, the number of publications in prominent journals and conference proceedings was also reviewed as a valuable secondary indicator of scholarly contribution within the discipline.
The final determination of a researcher’s standing in the ranking is anchored on their validated D-index, derived from the reputable and widely recognized databases OpenAlex and CrossRef. These platforms represent the most comprehensive bibliometric repositories available to the global research community, which reinforces the rigor and reliability of the ranking process.
For an in-depth explanation of the methodology underpinning this ranking, please visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
Through the creation of this ranking, Research.com strives to motivate researchers, industry leaders, and policymakers worldwide to engage actively with the trajectories of leading experts. Our mission is to provide the scientific community, academic institutions, and decision-makers with transparent and accessible insights into who the foremost specialists are within specific research areas, countries, and institutions.
By facilitating this knowledge exchange, we aim to foster collaboration, inform strategic investments in science, and ultimately contribute to the advancement of global research excellence.
