Data Sources and Citation Metrics
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Economics and Finance Scientists in Malaysia Ranking is primarily based on extensive bibliometric data aggregated from OpenAlex and CrossRef, along with multiple other reputable sources. These data platforms represent the most prominent and comprehensive repositories of academic publication and citation information currently available to the global research community. The citation-based metrics utilized for the ranking were meticulously collected on January 12, 2026, ensuring the most up-to-date and accurate reflection of scholarly impact. A key metric underpinning each scientist’s position in the ranking is the D-index (Discipline H-index), which specifically measures research output and citation impact within the defined discipline of Economics and Finance, thus isolating relevant scholarly contributions from broader publication records.
Scope of Research and Qualification Criteria
The ranking was constructed following a thorough examination of 279,971 scientific profiles drawn from diverse bibliometric data sources spanning all scientific disciplines. Among these, 21 scientists were identified as specializing in Economics and Finance. To qualify for inclusion in this specific ranking, each candidate was required to meet a minimum D-index threshold of 30, ensuring that only researchers demonstrating significant discipline-specific influence were considered. Additionally, a majority of each scientist’s tier publications needed to be firmly within the Economics and Finance fields. Beyond bibliometric criteria, recognition of awards and other notable achievements within the discipline also contributed to evaluation considerations.
The D-index thresholds were calibrated in increments of 10, tailored to the size of the scholarly population estimated for each discipline, thereby ensuring that the ranking captures the top 1% of the leading experts in Economics and Finance. Furthermore, to maintain relevance and specificity, the difference between a researcher’s overall H-index and their discipline-specific D-index was maintained at 30% or less, ensuring alignment between general scholarly prominence and concentrated strength in Economics and Finance.
Verification and Validation Practices
Aware of the inherent limitations of relying solely on raw bibliometric data to evaluate scholarly output, the Research.com team undertook rigorous manual verification of all scientist profiles. This process involved cross-correlating author profiles and publication records against a diverse array of trustworthy and authoritative sources across the academic landscape. While the ranking position is determined exclusively via the D-index calculated from OpenAlex and CrossRef data, the number of publications in prominent journals and leading conference proceedings was also reviewed as a valuable secondary indicator of a researcher’s scholarly contributions within their field.
This multi-layered approach underscores our commitment to precision and reliability, ensuring that the ranking reflects a truthful representation of academic leadership in Economics and Finance. For detailed insights into the methodology and data processing principles underlying this ranking, readers are encouraged to visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Vision
At Research.com, our mission is to empower researchers, institutions, companies, and policymakers worldwide by illuminating the pathways of leading scientific experts. Through releasing rigorously developed rankings such as this, we aim to provide a transparent and credible means for the global scientific community to identify and connect with foremost authorities in specific domains, at regional, national, and institutional levels. Our carefully curated rankings serve not only as a benchmark of academic excellence but also as a catalyst for collaboration, innovation, and informed decision-making in research policy and investment.
