World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
H-index 19

Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Medicine 1389 49 58 18

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 70
Documents by Best Scientists*: 72
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 2
SCIMAGO H-index: 111
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.16
Impact Factor: 2.8

Overview

Top Research Topics at Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine?

Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine primarily focuses on research topics in Intensive care medicine, Pediatrics, Pregnancy, Fetus and Obstetrics. The studies in Intensive care medicine featured incorporate elements of Psychological intervention, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Resuscitation and Clinical trial. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Pediatrics, it also covered topics in Epidemiology, Gestational age, Incidence (epidemiology), Cerebral palsy and Low birth weight.

Discussions in the journal are anchored in the subject of Pregnancy and the similar topic of Disease. While the journal focused on Fetus, it was also able to explore topics like Internal medicine, Immunology and Cardiology. The journal focuses on Internal medicine as well as the interrelated topic of Endocrinology.

The Immunology research dealing mostly with Inflammation is the focus of it.

  • Intensive care medicine (25.83%)
  • Pediatrics (22.07%)
  • Pregnancy (20.02%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Inflammation in preterm and term labour and delivery. (516 citations)
  • Long-term consequences of pain in human neonates. (416 citations)
  • The development of cerebral connections during the first 20-45 weeks' gestation. (398 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine:

The published papers investigate areas of study like Pregnancy, Pediatrics, Fetus, Immunology and Obstetrics. The published papers address concerns in Pregnancy which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Diabetes mellitus and Disease. Aside from discussions in Pediatrics, the journal articles also deal with the subject of Epidemiology which intersects with Etiology disciplines.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Surgery

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The aim of the journal is to expand the discussion of research in Intensive care medicine, Neonatal encephalopathy, Hypothermia, Pediatrics and Quality management. The research on Intensive care medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Psychological intervention, Hypoglycemia, Resuscitation and Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. It addresses concerns in Psychological intervention which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Intervention (counseling), Cognition and Neonatal intensive care unit.

Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine holds forums on Neonatal encephalopathy that merges themes from other disciplines such as Bioinformatics, Cerebral palsy, Brain function, Neuroprotection and Etiology. The presented research on Hypothermia deals specifically with Encephalopathy but it also addresses topics in Asphyxia. The Pediatrics works featured in Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine incorporate elements from Airway obstruction, Robin Sequence, Randomized controlled trial and Craniofacial.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Using rising tides to lift all boats: Equity-focused quality improvement as a tool to reduce neonatal health disparities. (5 citations)
  • Inter-center variability in neonatal outcomes of preterm infants: A longitudinal evaluation of 298 neonatal units in 11 countries (4 citations)
  • BPD treatments: The never-ending smorgasbord (3 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Steven M. Donn (20 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • Sunil K. Sinha (14 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Lex W. Doyle (11 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
  • Samir Gupta (10 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Patrick J. McNamara (9 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Boston Children's Hospital (99 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (41 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Stanford University (33 papers) published 12 papers at the last edition,
  • University of Michigan (29 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
  • James Cook University Hospital (28 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 1.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 41.89% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 16.22% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.86% of all publications and 27.03% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Impact on Nursing and Midwifery Research

While Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine has published significant research on various medical disciplines, there is an intersection of its topics with nursing and midwifery research. Obstetrics, Pregnancy, and Pediatrics are strongly linked with nursing, specifically midwifery. Over the years, the incorporation of these topics into nursing programs has been instrumental in improving neonatal outcomes. For instance, studies on Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Resuscitation, and Clinical trials can offer vital insights for neonatal nursing practice. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine's focus on Pediatrics and associated topics such as Low birth weight and Disease can also contribute to the improvement of pediatric nursing curriculum. Similarly, the journal’s exploration of topics like Internal medicine, Immunology, and Cardiology can have a significant impact on midwifery education. Recognizing these intersections can be invaluable for institutions offering these programs, like the ones you could find in the best nursing schools in Washington. Incorporating the latest research findings from Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine could ensure more comprehensive and current curricula, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes.

Top Publications

  • The fetal inflammatory response syndrome: the origins of a concept, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and obstetrical implications

    Eunjung Jung;Roberto Romero;Lami Yeo;Ramiro Diaz-Primera

    (2020)
    221 Citations
  • Have outcomes following extremely preterm birth improved over time

    Jeanie Ly. Cheong;Jeanie Ly. Cheong;Alicia J. Spittle;Alicia J. Spittle;Alice C. Burnett;Alice C. Burnett;Peter J. Anderson;Peter J. Anderson

    (2020)
    78 Citations
  • Neuroimaging in the term newborn with neonatal encephalopathy.

    Jessica L Wisnowski;Pia Wintermark;Sonia L Bonifacio;Christopher D Smyser

    (2021)
    58 Citations
  • Neonatal encephalopathy: Focus on epidemiology and underexplored aspects of etiology

    S McIntyre;K B Nelson;S B Mulkey;M Lechpammer

    (2021)
    55 Citations
  • Long-term motor outcomes of very preterm and/or very low birth weight individuals without cerebral palsy: A review of the current evidence.

    Kari Anne Indredavik Evensen;Tordis Ustad;Marjaana Tikanmäki;Peija Haaramo

    (2020)
    41 Citations
  • Update on mechanisms of the pathophysiology of neonatal encephalopathy.

    Joanne O Davidson;Fernando Gonzalez;Pierre Gressens;Alistair J Gunn

    (2021)
    41 Citations
  • Mental health outcomes of adults born very preterm or with very low birth weight: A systematic review.

    Rachel Robinson;Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen;Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen;Daniel Schnitzlein;Daniel Schnitzlein;Falk Voit

    (2020)
    37 Citations
  • Therapies for neonatal encephalopathy: Targeting the latent, secondary and tertiary phases of evolving brain injury.

    Aravanan A Chakkarapani;Aravanan A Chakkarapani;Hany Aly;Manon Benders;C Michael Cotten

    (2021)
    36 Citations
  • Mechanisms of brain injury in newborn infants associated with the fetal inflammatory response syndrome.

    Vivien Yap;Jeffrey M. Perlman

    (2020)
    35 Citations
  • Early developmental interventions for infants born very preterm - what works?

    Peter J. Anderson;Karli Treyvaud;Alicia J. Spittle

    (2020)
    32 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways in healthcare. Many professionals start with nursing programs and advance their qualifications through flexible, accredited online options.

Comparing options like wgu vs chamberlain can help prospective students identify the best online RN to BSN programs tailored to their needs, considering factors like curriculum, support, and cost.

For those looking to advance further, affordable pathways such as the cheapest bsn to msn online programs provide an economical way to gain a Master of Science in Nursing, enabling roles in advanced practice and leadership.

Some learners prefer programs with less hands-on requirements. Options like the rn to bsn program without clinicals allow students to earn their degrees without traditional clinical hours, which can offer greater flexibility.

For the highest level of nursing education, the fastest dnp program online option supports nurses aiming to become Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), often the terminal degree required for top clinical and academic roles.

Exploring these pathways ensures a well-rounded approach to advancing a medical career through accessible and comprehensive online education.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal