| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 17 | 1056 | 1357 | 48 |
| Environmental Sciences | 100 | 240 | 422 | 36 |
The journal focuses on Holocene, Glacial period, Oceanography, Paleontology and Physical geography. It holds forums on Holocene that merges themes from other disciplines such as Ecology, Climate change, Climatology and Radiocarbon dating. It features Climatology research that overlaps with concepts in Precipitation.
The study of Glacial period, which falls within the realm of Geomorphology, was the main focus of the presentations. The Oceanography study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Sediment. Pleistocene, Quaternary, Chronology, Sedimentary rock and Fluvial are Paleontology topics of special interest in it.
The field of Archaeology is the anchor for the Pleistocene studies presented in the journal. It addresses concerns in Physical geography which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Paleoclimatology and Stadial. Topics in Ice sheet explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Ice stream, Arctic ice pack, Ice shelf, Ice-sheet model and Antarctic sea ice.
The most cited articles are mainly concerned with subjects like Holocene, Glacial period, Oceanography, Climatology and Paleontology. The published articles with studies in Holocene featured incorporate elements of Ecology, Radiocarbon dating and Physical geography. The most cited publications facilitate discussions on Glacial period that incorporate concepts from other fields like Glacier and Quaternary.
Quaternary Science Reviews is organized to address concerns in the fields of Holocene, Physical geography, Glacial period, Oceanography and Pleistocene. The Holocene research discussed in the journal can contribute to the expansion of the discourse in closely related subjects like
The work on Glacial period tackled in it brings together disciplines like Glacier and Ice sheet. It explores topics in Oceanography which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Marine isotope stage and Sediment. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Pleistocene, it also covered topics in Paleoecology, Quaternary and Cave.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Quaternary Science Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Quaternary Science Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 3.94% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 33.14% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 12.90% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.72% of all publications and 37.24% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
April S. Dalton;April S. Dalton;Martin Margold;Chris R. Stokes;Lev Tarasov
(2020)Fahu Chen;Jifeng Zhang;Jianbao Liu;Xianyong Cao
(2020)Unknown
(2022)Jose Iriarte;Sarah Elliott;S. Yoshi Maezumi;Daiana Alves
(2020)Haiwei Zhang;Haiwei Zhang;Xu Zhang;Xu Zhang;Xu Zhang;Yanjun Cai;Yanjun Cai;Ashish Sinha
(2021)Daniel M. Sigman;François Fripiat;François Fripiat;Anja S. Studer;Preston C. Kemeny
(2021)Nerilie J. Abram;Jessica A. Hargreaves;Nicky M. Wright;Kaustubh Thirumalai
(2020)George H. Denton;Aaron E. Putnam;Joellen L. Russell;David J.A. Barrell
(2021)Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career options that extend beyond traditional environmental roles. Many students explore related fields, including counseling and healthcare, which increasingly intersect with environmental and community health issues. For those interested in therapeutic professions, online programs like marriage and family masters programs offer flexible pathways to become licensed counselors focusing on family and social dynamics.
Understanding the type of counselors available can help prospective students choose the best program aligned with their career goals. Whether aiming for mental health counseling or specializing in environmental psychology, these roles play critical parts in community resilience and well-being.
For those drawn to healthcare, the role of a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) combines clinical practice with mental health expertise. Insights into pmhnp salary by state highlight the growing demand and rewarding compensation in this field, which often complements environmental public health initiatives.
Lastly, gaining an online masters psychology degree provides a solid foundation for careers in various sectors, including environmental consultancy and community health advocacy. Such interdisciplinary approaches enrich the impact of environmental sciences graduates in addressing complex societal challenges.
