| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 105 | 449 | 340 | 32 |
The journal focuses on Psychometrics, Clinical psychology, Test validity, Developmental psychology and Psychiatry. The close relationship between Confirmatory factor analysis and Exploratory factor analysis is one of the points of interest dissected in Psychometrics research. It holds forums on Clinical psychology that merges themes from other disciplines such as PsycINFO, Scale (social sciences) and Anxiety.
The journal explores topics in PsycINFO which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Item response theory and Measurement invariance. The study on Anxiety featured in the journal expounds on the topic of Anxiety disorder in particular. The Test validity works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Social psychology, Rating scale, Convergent validity, Construct validity and Discriminant validity.
Issues in Developmental psychology were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Cognition, Intelligence quotient and Psychopathy. The studies in Psychopathy featured incorporate elements of Antisocial personality disorder and Psychopathy Checklist. Presentations on Psychiatry include those discussing Depression (differential diagnoses) and Mental health.
The most cited publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Psychometrics, Test validity, Developmental psychology, Clinical psychology and Psychiatry. The most cited articles explore issues in Psychometrics which can be linked to other research areas like Psychological testing, Rating scale, Confirmatory factor analysis, Anxiety and Personality. Social psychology, Validity, Convergent validity, Construct validity and Discriminant validity are some topics wherein Test validity research discussed in the journal articles has an impact.
The scientific interests tackled in the journal are PsycINFO, Clinical psychology, Test validity, Psychometrics and Scale (social sciences). Test (assessment), Construct (philosophy), Convergent validity, Discriminant validity and Measurement invariance are some topics wherein PsycINFO research discussed in Psychological Assessment have an impact. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Measurement invariance, it also covered topics in Structural equation modeling and Sample (statistics).
While it focused on Clinical psychology, it was also able to explore topics like Confirmatory factor analysis, Item response theory, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Personality and Mental health. Some problems in Test validity that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Developmental psychology, Context (language use), DSM-5 and Anxiety. The study on Psychometrics presented in the journal intersects with subjects under the field of Psychological testing.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Psychological Assessment (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Psychological Assessment (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 38.58% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.67% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.69% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.64% of all publications and 50.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Understanding the research topics and most cited papers in psychological assessment is not only beneficial for those actively involved in the field but also for those who aspire to build a career in this discipline. Tranforming these insights into practical applications and concrete work results is crucial, which begins from proper academic background and professional orientation. One of the career paths someone interested in psychological assessment could consider is the role of a school psychologist. School psychologists are trained to evaluate, intervene, and prevent problems in the educational setting. This role involves a deeper understanding of topics like psychometrics, test validity, and developmental psychology, which are extensively discussed in the journal. In order to become a school psychologist, specific education and licensure requirements need to be met. Usually, this involves earning a specialist-level degree in school psychology and obtaining certification or licensure in your respective state. Students interested in this route should diligently review school psychologist education requirements in Wisconsin and compare them with other state's standards. While working as a school psychologist, continuous learning and staying updated with the latest studies in psychological assessment is beneficial. This journal can serve as a useful resource and reference for research topics, innovative methodologies, and validated psychological instruments. Apart from this, attending seminars, training, and conferences is also advisable to build a network with other professionals in the field and keep abreast with the recent developments in psychological assessment.
Todd B. Kashdan;David J. Disabato;Fallon R. Goodman;James D. Doorley
(2020)Kathryn R Fox;Julia A Harris;Shirley B Wang;Alexander J Millner
(2020)Unknown
(2021)Morten Moshagen;Ingo Zettler;Benjamin E. Hilbig
(2020)Herbert W Marsh;Felicia A Huppert;James N Donald;Marcus S Horwood
(2020)Charlene A Deming;Julia A Harris;Franckie Castro-Ramirez;Jeffrey J Glenn
(2021)Joshua R. Oltmanns;Thomas A. Widiger
(2020)Gillian A McCabe;Thomas A Widiger
(2020)For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond psychology, related fields such as social work and counseling offer valuable career opportunities. Affordable Online MSW Programs provide a flexible and cost-effective way to enter the social work profession, especially for working professionals seeking to enhance their skills without interrupting their careers.
Students looking for a faster route can consider a 1 Year Online Master's in Social Work, which accelerates the educational process while maintaining accreditation standards. This option is ideal for individuals eager to enter the workforce quickly with advanced qualifications.
Similarly, accelerated psychology programs allow learners to complete their degrees in a shortened timeframe. These programs are designed to balance rigor with efficiency, helping students transition smoothly into psychology-related roles.
For those specializing in counseling, CACREP Online Masters in Counseling programs offer comprehensive training with recognized accreditation, ensuring high standards in education and professional readiness. These pathways collectively broaden the scope for psychology graduates, enabling diverse and fulfilling career trajectories.
Explore these options to find the right fit for your goals:
