| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunology | 139 | 30 | 39 | 13 |
| Medicine | 1345 | 92 | 114 | 18 |
The discussions in the journal mainly cover the fields of Intensive care medicine, Internal medicine, Asthma, COPD and Disease. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine holds forums on Intensive care medicine that merges themes from other disciplines such as Mechanical ventilation, Clinical trial, Lung and Pneumonia. While Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine focused on Lung, it was also able to explore topics like Cystic fibrosis and Pathology.
Gastroenterology, Oncology and Cardiology are some topics wherein Internal medicine research discussed in it have an impact. Research in the field of Immunology was used to conduct the presented Asthma study. Inflammation and Immune system are some of the study areas of Immunology discussed.
Issues in COPD were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Pulmonary disease, Exacerbation and Physical therapy.
The most cited publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Immunology, Disease, Lung, Intensive care medicine and Internal medicine. While work presented in the journal papers provide substantial information on Immunology, it also covers topics in Cystic fibrosis and Bronchiectasis. The published articles explore themes in Internal medicine like Clinical trial and link them with other fields of study like In patient.
The journal primarily focuses on research topics in Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), COPD and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In it, Oncology and Cardiology are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Internal medicine research. Intensive care medicine research featured in it incorporates concerns from various other topics such as Epidemiology, MEDLINE, Lung, Disease and Asthma.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) research in it involves the investigation of ARDS studies, all of which are linked to disciplines such as Acute respiratory distress. The studies on COPD discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Pulmonary disease, Exacerbation and Depression (differential diagnoses). The research on Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) featured in the journal combines topics in other fields like Healthcare system and Virology.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 7.05% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 16.55% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 8.28% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 12.41% of all publications and 62.76% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Chiara Robba;Denise Battaglini;Paolo Pelosi;Patricia R. M. Rocco
(2020)Evgeni Mekov;Marc Miravitlles;Rosen Petkov
(2020)Martin Reck;Geetha Shankar;Anthony Lee;Shelley Coleman
(2020)Emiel Fm Wouters;Rein Posthuma;Maud Koopman;Wai-Yan Liu
(2020)Matthew F Mart;Lorraine B Ware
(2020)Ellen Gorman;Jonathan Millar;Danny McAuley;Cecilia O'Kane
(2021)Golam Rabbani;Sheikh Mohammad Shariful Islam;Muhammad Aziz Rahman;Muhammad Aziz Rahman;Nuhu Amin
(2021)For those interested in medicine but not yet ready to commit to a medical degree, exploring related online programs can be a smart step. Many students begin with online medical assistant programs fafsa approved, which provide essential healthcare skills along with financial aid options to support your education journey.
If you are looking to advance your clinical expertise, consider a medical assistant to lpn bridge program online. This pathway offers a streamlined route to become a licensed practical nurse, widening your career opportunities in the healthcare field.
Alternatively, pursuing an online biology bachelor's degree is ideal for students planning to enter medical school later or seeking a strong science foundation. This degree opens doors not only to medical careers but also to research and allied health professions.
Another valuable option is an online asn degree, which prepares you for nursing roles with flexibility and accessibility. These programs often serve as a stepping stone to becoming a registered nurse or furthering your education in healthcare.
Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways can significantly enhance your healthcare knowledge and improve your chances of success in the competitive medical industry.