World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Econometric Reviews
H-index 9

Econometric Reviews

0747-4938

Published by: Taylor & Francis

https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lecr20

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Economics and Finance 308 34 56 7

Additional Metrics

Number of Best Scientists*: 48
Documents by Best Scientists*: 67
Top 100 Ranked Scientists*: 3
SCIMAGO H-index: 68
SCIMAGO SJR: 1.536
Impact Factor: 1

Overview

Top Research Topics at Econometric Reviews?

Econometrics, Monetary economics, Statistics, Monetary policy and Labour economics are among the topics commonly tackled in the journal. The journal links adjacent topics like Econometrics with Estimator. Interest rate and Inflation are all subfields of Monetary economics research that were featured in Econometric Reviews.

It explores studies in Monetary policy as part of the wider topic of Macroeconomics.

  • Econometrics (11.17%)
  • Monetary economics (9.58%)
  • Statistics (6.19%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

  • Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariances (2840 citations)
  • A test for independence based on the correlation dimension (1855 citations)
  • Modelling the persistence of conditional variances (1472 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Econometric Reviews:

The published papers primarily tackle Econometrics, Statistics, Estimator, Monetary economics and Monetary policy. In addition to Econometrics research, the journal articles aim to explore topics under Regression analysis and Monte Carlo method. While work presented in the most cited publications provide substantial information on Estimator, it also covers topics in Inference and Applied mathematics.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

  • World War II
  • Statistics
  • Law

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

Econometric Reviews explores disciplines such as Econometrics, Estimation, Estimator, Statistics and Applied mathematics. In Econometric Reviews, Inference and Random variable are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Econometrics research. It deals with Inference in conjunction with Asymptotic distribution and similar fields in Nonparametric statistics.

Issues in Estimation were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Panel data, Algorithm, Covariate and Sieve. The Estimator study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of Lasso (statistics). Specifically, studies on Heteroscedasticity are prevalent in the Statistics works discussed.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

  • Testing for strict stationarity in a random coefficient autoregressive model (6 citations)
  • Common Factors and Spatial Dependence: An Application to US House Prices (6 citations)
  • Partially linear functional-coefficient dynamic panel data models: sieve estimation and specification testing (5 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing in Econometric Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Mark Drabenstott (57 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Kazuo Nonomura (44 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Miyohei Shinohara (42 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Yoshihiro Takasuka (42 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Shigeto Tsuru (40 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Econometric Reviews (based on the number of publications) are:

  • University of Southern California (19 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 3 more than at the previous edition,
  • University of Bologna (17 papers) absent at the last edition,
  • Xiamen University (17 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Emory University (17 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition,
  • University of California, Riverside (17 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 37.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 25.53% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.64% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 14.89% of all publications and 48.94% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Linkages with Accountancy Practice

The missing section in the article could be "Linkages with Accountancy Practice," which could enhance the depth of the content by explaining the potential implications of econometrics research in practical fields like accountancy. It would connect the theoretical aspects of the discipline with its real-world applications, thus providing a broader context for understanding the articles published in Econometric Reviews. Here is the drafted section: Many of the economic principles discussed in Econometric Reviews have direct applications in the field of accountancy. A deeper understanding of concepts like Regression Analysis, Applied Mathematics, and Monte Carlo method can contribute significantly to more precise and strategic financial decision-making in businesses. For example, the knowledge of econometric models can be used to analyze financial statements, predict future revenues, or even study market trends, thus offering valuable insights for accountants.

Aspiring accountants who wish to enhance their knowledge by integrating econometrics into their studies might consider enrolling in top universities offering specialized programs. Here are some of the best accounting programs in iowa, known for their emphasis on comprehensive, cross-disciplinary education. These programs blend traditional accountancy courses with cutting-edge economic theory and quantitative methods, providing students with an integrated skill set that can significantly increase their competitiveness in today's data-driven marketplace.

Ultimately, the interplay of econometrics and accountancy can lead to more accurate financial forecasting, efficient resource allocation, and proactive risk management. It underscores the importance of multi-disciplinary approaches in tackling the complex challenges of today's business landscape.

Top Publications

  • Forecasting crude oil price intervals and return volatility via autoregressive conditional interval models

    Yanan He;Ai Han;Yongmiao Hong;Yuying Sun

    (2021)
    20 Citations
  • An augmented Anderson–Hsiao estimator for dynamic short-T panels†

    Alexander Chudik;M. Hashem Pesaran;M. Hashem Pesaran

    (2021)
    16 Citations
  • Smooth coefficient models with endogenous environmental variables

    Michael S. Delgado;Deniz Ozabaci;Yiguo Sun;Subal C. Kumbhakar

    (2020)
    13 Citations
  • Efficient semiparametric copula estimation of regression models with endogeneity

    (2021)
    12 Citations
  • Multiple subordinated modeling of asset returns: Implications for option pricing

    Abootaleb Shirvani;Svetlozar T. Rachev;Frank J. Fabozzi

    (2021)
    11 Citations
  • The two-way Mundlak estimator

    (2023)
    11 Citations

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Economics and Finance, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many students prioritize cost-efficiency, making an accounting degree online cost a key consideration when choosing a program. Affordable options ensure access without compromising quality.

Time is another crucial factor. Accelerated programs such as an accelerated business management degree allow students to gain skills quickly and enter the workforce sooner. Similarly, pursuing the best online finance degree can provide specialized knowledge in areas like investment and financial analysis, supporting career growth.

For graduates seeking leadership roles, enrolling in the shortest MBA program online offers a fast-tracked route to advanced business expertise and managerial positions.

Choosing the right program involves balancing cost, duration, and career goals. Whether aiming for accounting, finance, business management, or an MBA, online accelerated degrees present flexible, efficient pathways to career advancement.

Best Scientists Contributing to This Journal

Recently Published Articles