| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medicine | 1594 | 43 | 42 | 16 |
The foci of Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences are Internal medicine, Immunology, Disease, Endocrinology and Bioinformatics. In addition to Internal medicine research, it aims to explore topics under Gastroenterology, Oncology and Cardiology. The research on Immunology discussed in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences draws on the closely related field of Cancer.
The studies tackled, which mainly focus on Cancer, apply to Cancer research as well. While Disease is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Biomarker (medicine) and Intensive care medicine.
The published papers investigate studies in Internal medicine, Immunology, Endocrinology, Biochemistry and Disease. The published papers facilitate discussions on Internal medicine that incorporate concepts from other fields like Gastroenterology, Diabetes mellitus and Cardiology. The journal papers with studies in Immunology featured incorporate elements of Cancer and Cancer research.
The journal is organized to address concerns in the fields of Disease, Intensive care medicine, Medical laboratory, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Biomarker (medicine). The study of Disease encompasses disciplines such as Bioinformatics, as well as fields such as Metabolic syndrome, Glycation, Endothelial dysfunction, Diabetes mellitus and Pathogenesis, all of which overlap with one another. The featured Biomarker (medicine) study falls within the wider topic of Internal medicine.
The work on Internal medicine presented in the journal focuses on Prostate cancer in particular. The journal aims to investigate interdisciplinary topics such as In patient and Immunology. Specifically, studies on Inflammation are prevalent in the Immunology works discussed.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.42% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.53% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 5.26% of all publications and 65.79% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
An interesting aspect to consider discussing in parallel to the subjects and findings of this journal is potential career pathways, such as becoming a Nurse Practitioner, for those with a keen interest in Clinical Laboratory Sciences. One viable career option could be becoming a nurse practitioner, specializing in areas like Internal Medicine, Immunology, or Endocrinology. As an example, in the state of Connecticut, there are specific steps and requirements that need to be adhered to, to progress within this field. This guide on how to become a nurse practitioner in Connecticut provides an elaborate roadmap for aspiring clinical professionals oin this state. Exploring these options would bring a real-world application to the discussions and researches presented in the Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences and can inspire simply curious readers or those seeking to cement a career path into Clinical Laboratory Sciences.
Victoria Higgins;Dorsa Sohaei;Eleftherios P. Diamandis;Ioannis Prassas
(2021)Samir Softic;Samir Softic;Kimber L. Stanhope;Jeremie Boucher;Senad Divanovic;Senad Divanovic
(2020)Yumeng Wen;Chirag R. Parikh
(2021)Maryam Saberi-Karimian;Zahra Khorasanchi;Hamideh Ghazizadeh;Maryam Tayefi
(2021)Ana-Maria Simundic;Geoffrey Baird;Janne Cadamuro;Seán J Costelloe
(2020)Clarissa A Whitehead;Andrew H Kaye;Andrew H Kaye;Katharine J Drummond;Katharine J Drummond;Samuel S Widodo
(2020)Kirsten E. J. Wesenhagen;Charlotte E. Teunissen;Pieter Jelle Visser;Betty M. Tijms
(2020)Sander De Bruyne;Marijn M. Speeckaert;Wim Van Biesen;Joris R. Delanghe
(2021)For students interested in Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees and certifications can provide valuable career flexibility. One popular option is pursuing medical billing and coding programs. These programs equip learners with the skills needed to manage healthcare records and billing processes, offering a faster pathway into the healthcare industry.
Biology majors looking beyond traditional roles can find lucrative opportunities in healthcare and research. Understanding high paying jobs with a biology degree helps students align their education with market demand while targeting specialized roles such as biotechnology or medical research.
Professional certifications, such as the ccs certification, can significantly boost job prospects for medical coders. This credential represents a higher level of expertise compared to entry-level certifications and often leads to higher salaries and more advanced career opportunities.
For those considering the timeline of entering the field, exploring how long does it take to become a medical coder provides insight into the educational commitment required. Many programs can be completed within a year, making it a practical option for those seeking swift entry into healthcare careers.
