| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 397 | 9 | 11 | 4 |
| Ecology and Evolution | 668 | 10 | 9 | 4 |
The topics of Botany, Ecology, Taxonomy (biology), Genus and Zoology are the focal point of discussions in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. It focuses on different Botany studies like Taxon, Pollen, Herbarium, Pollination and Inflorescence. The Pollination study tackling the subject of Pollinator is the focus of the journal.
More specifically, the research on Ecology in it is related to Flora. The research on Flora discussed in the journal draws on the closely related field of Panama. The study on Taxonomy (biology) presented in the journal intersects with the topics under Geographic distribution.
The most cited publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Botany, Ecology, Phylogenetics, Evolutionary biology and Paleontology. The published papers explore research in Botany alongside concepts in Monophyly and other areas of study in Paraphyly. Phylogenetic tree and Ribosomal DNA are some topics wherein Evolutionary biology research discussed in the published papers has an impact.
The journal explores disciplines such as Botany, Genus, Taxonomy (biology), Taxon and Key (lock). The Botany works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Salsoloideae and Phylogenetic tree. While work presented in it provided substantial information on Genus, it also covered topics in Nomenclature, Gentianaceae, Life history theory, Taxonomic rank and Habit (biology).
Amaranthaceae and Subfamily are some topics wherein Taxonomy (biology) research discussed in it have an impact. The journal explores issues in Taxon which can be linked to other research areas like Calyx, Stamen, Type (biology), Inflorescence and Trichome. The overlapping concepts between Identification (biology) and Verbenaceae, Tribe (biology), Citharexylum, Poeae and Agrostis are the key highlights of Key (lock) study.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 14.29% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 50.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 25.00% of all publications and 25.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Marcin Nobis;Marcin Nobis;Polina D. Gudkova;Polina D. Gudkova;Arkadiusz Nowak;Arkadiusz Nowak;Jakub Sawicki
(2020)Liza S. Comita;Liza S. Comita;Simon M. Stump
(2020)Mark B. Bush
(2020)Ana Carolina Galindo da Costa;William Wayt Thomas;Artur Campos D. Maia;Daniela Maria do Amaral Ferraz Navarro
(2021)Ana Isabel Honfi;Osvaldo Morrone;Fernando Omar Zuloaga
(2021)Fernando O. Zuloaga;Sandra S. Aliscioni;M. Amalia Scataglini
(2020)Steven P. Sylvester;Steven P. Sylvester;Robert J. Soreng;William J. Bravo-Pedraza;Lia E. Cuta-Alarcon
(2020)Carolina Delfini;Carolina Delfini;Juan M. Acosta;Vinicius Castro Souza;Fernando O. Zuloaga
(2020)For those interested in Plant Science and Agronomy, exploring allied fields like nutrition and dietetics can open additional career opportunities. Many students seek flexible learning options, and pursuing a dnp fnp programs offers a path to advanced healthcare roles that complement knowledge in plant-based nutrition and sustainability.
Similarly, a masters degree in nutrition helps students deepen their understanding of food science and its impact on human health, equipping them for careers in research, policy, or education.
The demand for healthcare professionals with expertise in dietary science is growing. Enrolling in the best online registered dietitian programs provides comprehensive training for those aiming to become licensed dietitians, a role closely connected to agronomy and food systems.
For a more affordable route, many students explore a nutrition degree online, which balances cost and flexibility without sacrificing quality. These online options enable learners to tailor their education to fit career goals linked to sustainable agriculture and nutrition science.
