| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 48 | 356 | 565 | 29 |
Agronomy Journal was organized to reinforce research efforts on Agronomy, Soil water, Nitrogen, Forage and Cultivar. Poaceae, Sowing, Fertilizer, Crop and Irrigation are all topics related to Agronomy research discussed. The journal focuses on Poaceae research which is adjacent to topics in Field experiment.
The majority of Soil water studies presented zero in on Loam. Research on Forage addressed in the journal frequently intersections with the field of Dry matter.
The published papers primarily tackle Agronomy, Poaceae, Soil water, Sowing and Cultivar. Agronomy research in the most cited papers connects with the study of Nitrogen. The most cited papers explore issues in Soil water which can be linked to other research areas like Irrigation and Water content.
The objective of the journal is to combine knowledge in the areas of Agronomy, Nitrogen, Yield (engineering), Cover crop and Yield (finance). The research on Agronomy discussed in the journal draws on the closely related field of Agroforestry.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Agronomy Journal (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Agronomy Journal (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.17% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 29.04% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 13.11% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 17.56% of all publications and 40.28% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Gurpreet Kaur;Gurbir Singh;Peter P. Motavalli;Kelly A. Nelson
(2020)Rattan Lal
(2020)Hesham F Alharby;Shah Fahad
(2020)Luiz Gustavo Moretti;Carlos A. C. Crusciol;Eiko E. Kuramae;João W. Bossolani
(2020)Curtis J. Ransom;Newell R. Kitchen;James J. Camberato;Paul R. Carter
(2020)Mervin St. Luce;Reynald Lemke;Yantai Gan;Brian McConkey
(2020)Muzammal Rehman;Mei Yang;Shah Fahad;Muhammad Hamzah Saleem
(2020)Bhupinder S. Farmaha;Udayakumar Sekaran;Alan J. Franzluebbers
(2021)Osmar H. De Castro Pias;Tales Tiecher;Maurício Roberto Cherubin;Aijânio Gomes de Brito Silva
(2020)Exploring Plant Science and Agronomy in the USA opens diverse educational and professional opportunities. Many students pursue online degree programs to advance their careers while balancing other commitments. For instance, some health-related fields offer accelerated options such as the rn to bsn in 6 months, which highlight the growing trend of fast-track education formats.
Similarly, those interested in bridging gaps between different qualification levels may consider programs like the rn to np bridge program. These pathways emphasize the importance of flexibility and progression within specialized fields, offering a model that can inspire agricultural education alternatives as well.
For individuals entering new disciplines without prior experience, options like the online direct entry msn programs for non nurses show how accessible online learning can be, a principle that applies across many scientific and agronomy-related areas.
Choosing the right institution also matters. Comparing schools, such as in the which school is better snhu vs wgu guide, can help students identify the best fit for their educational goals, financial situation, and learning style.
