2026 Sports Analytics Degree Completion Rates by Format: Online, Hybrid, and Campus Programs Compared
Choosing how to complete a sports analytics degree poses a critical challenge for many students. Faced with options ranging from fully online programs to hybrid and traditional campus formats, prospective learners must consider not only convenience but also the likelihood of successfully finishing their degrees. Each format presents distinct demands on time management, access to resources, and interaction with peers and faculty, all of which influence completion outcomes.
Understanding how completion rates vary by format reveals much about the real-world tradeoffs students encounter. Factors such as program structure, support services, and learning environment play key roles in student persistence. This article compares online, hybrid, and campus sports analytics degree completion rates, explores the elements shaping student success, and offers guidance for those seeking the format best aligned with their educational goals.
Key Things to Know About Sports Analytics Degree Completion Rates by Format
- Online sports analytics programs show a 15% lower completion rate than campus formats, reflecting challenges in sustaining engagement with complex data courses remotely, which can delay or deter degree fulfillment.
- Hybrid models blend online and face-to-face learning, improving completion rates by allowing hands-on labs crucial for analytics skill-building, thus supporting timely progression in technically demanding subjects.
- A 2024 study found campus programs had the highest completion-around 78%-due to immersive peer collaboration and immediate access to faculty, impacting employability through stronger practical experience.
- Key Things to Know About Sports Analytics Degree Completion Rates by Format Key Things to Know About Sports Analytics Degree Completion Rates by Format
- How Do Completion Rates Compare Across Online, Hybrid, and Campus Sports Analytics Programs? Completion Rate Comparison
- What Factors Have the Greatest Impact on Sports Analytics Degree Completion? Degree Completion Factors
- Which Sports Analytics Degree Format Is Hardest to Complete? Completion Difficulty
- How Does Each Sports Analytics Learning Format Affect Student Success? How Does Each Sports Analytics Learning Format Affect Student Success?
- How Does Enrollment Status Affect Sports Analytics Completion Rates? How Does Enrollment Status Affect Sports Analytics Completion Rates?
- Can Transfer Credits Improve Sports Analytics Degree Completion? Transfer Credits
- What Student Support Services Improve Sports Analytics Completion Rates? Student Support Services
- How Do Sports Analytics Completion Rates Affect Career Outcomes? Impact on Career Outcomes
- How Should Students Choose the Best Sports Analytics Learning Format? Choosing the Best Format
- What Are the Long-Term Pros and Cons of Each Sports Analytics Learning Format? Learning Format Pros & Cons
How Do Completion Rates Compare Across Online, Hybrid, and Campus Sports Analytics Programs?
Completion rates in sports analytics degree programs serve more as reflections of who chooses each instructional format rather than direct indicators of program quality. Students opting for campus-based programs often differ significantly from those enrolling in online or hybrid formats, with variations tied to factors like prior academic preparation, available time, and motivation. Consequently, comparing sports analytics degree completion rates online versus campus should account for these underlying student characteristics rather than assuming inherent strengths or weaknesses in the programs themselves.
Differences in completion rates among online, hybrid, and campus programs often stem from the distinct challenges and commitments associated with each format. For instance, students in online programs may juggle full-time jobs or family responsibilities that reduce their ability to engage consistently, which can lower graduation likelihood despite greater scheduling flexibility. Hybrid programs strike a middle ground, blending digital content with occasional on-campus engagement, appealing to those who need balance but can periodically access institutional support. Meanwhile, campus programs typically offer more immersive environments and structured schedules but demand greater time availability and physical presence, favoring students who can dedicate themselves more intensively. Overall, success hinges as much on individual circumstances as on the chosen learning mode, as seen in nuanced comparisons of graduation success in hybrid sports analytics programs.
Prospective students weighing these completion rate trends should integrate them with personal learning preferences, career aspirations, and external responsibilities when choosing a format. Those needing maximum flexibility may prioritize online options despite modestly lower completion rates, while others might value the network and discipline benefits of campus enrollment. Hybrid paths offer compromise but still require careful time management. For example, a working professional pursuing a specialized technical track might explore AI degree programs with similar format options to gauge fit. Judging educational pathways by how well they align with real-world demands ultimately fosters more reliable progression and completion than relying solely on broad program metrics.
What Factors Have the Greatest Impact on Sports Analytics Degree Completion?
Successful degree completion in sports analytics reflects a complex interplay of personal circumstances, academic rigor, and program design rather than motivation alone. While determination certainly matters, external factors such as learning environment and career alignment heavily influence outcomes. Completion rates differ across formats because these elements affect student engagement and support differently. Below are key factors that commonly impact whether students graduate from sports analytics programs.
- Student Engagement and Campus Access: Students enrolled in campus-based programs typically have a 15% higher completion rate than fully online peers, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. Physical proximity to faculty and peers fosters real-time interaction, accountability, and motivation, especially benefiting those who thrive in structured settings.
- Hybrid Learning Flexibility with Structure: Hybrid formats blend online convenience with scheduled face-to-face sessions, which helps students better persist by combining flexibility with periodic hands-on experiences. This structure is ideal for learners balancing work and family, providing rhythm without isolating them.
- Applied Career-Focused Curriculum: Programs that integrate internships, applied projects, and industry collaboration improve retention by clearly linking coursework to employment opportunities. Students juggling education alongside jobs tend to sustain motivation when they see tangible career pathways embedded in their studies.
- Financial Stability and Support Services: Online students often face financial pressures and limited advising, which can increase dropout risk. Adequate financial aid and proactive institutional support help working professionals remain enrolled by alleviating economic stress and academic uncertainty.
- Self-Management and Time Organization Skills: Online formats demand strong self-discipline and time management. Students without these skills are more prone to falling behind, so developing routines and prioritizing coursework is critical for successful completion.
- Access to Academic Resources and Technology: Reliable access to software, data sets, and virtual labs is essential in sports analytics for mastering complex techniques. Inequities here can hinder progress, particularly in remote learning scenarios.
- Social Connectedness and Peer Support: Feeling isolated can reduce persistence in online environments. Creating virtual study groups or joining campus clubs can enhance belonging and accountability, benefiting students' perseverance and success.
For prospective students weighing format options, it's vital to assess which combination of these factors aligns with their personal circumstances. Those needing greater structure and direct interaction might favor campus or hybrid routes, while disciplined, self-directed learners with stable financial resources may find fully online programs suitable. For example, a working parent managing job duties and childcare might boost completion odds by choosing a hybrid model that offers weekend in-person labs alongside flexible online coursework. Integrating applied learning ensures that educational efforts directly translate into industry-relevant skills, reinforcing the degree's value beyond mere credentialing.
Understanding these multifaceted factors clarifies why degree completion in sports analytics is not a matter of motivation alone but a balance of engagement, support, practical relevance, and resource access.
Prospective students interested in financially viable online education paths might consider options like the accounting degree online listings on research.com, which reflect similar challenges and solutions in program completion.

Which Sports Analytics Degree Format Is Hardest to Complete?
Completion rates for sports analytics degree programs differ substantially by format, largely due to the nature of student engagement and support structures. Recent data from 2024 by the National Student Clearinghouse and the National Center for Education Statistics reveal that fully online programs see completion rates near 45%, notably lower than hybrid programs at about 65%, and campus-based programs exceeding 70%. These disparities highlight the challenge online students face with self-discipline and balancing external responsibilities, while hybrid and campus formats provide varying degrees of direct interaction and accountability that aid persistence.
For example, a working professional pursuing an online sports analytics degree may struggle to stay on track amid job demands and limited real-time peer engagement, unlike a campus student who benefits from scheduled classes and immediate faculty access. Hybrid programs attempt to bridge this gap, offering flexibility while maintaining some in-person engagement, which can bolster retention. However, program difficulty is not solely defined by format; individual circumstances and institutional support play critical roles in overcoming obstacles tied to each learning environment.
One recent graduate reflected on their experience choosing between an online and campus sports analytics program while balancing family care. Initially, the flexibility of online learning seemed ideal, but the lack of structured interaction led to mounting stress and frequent delays. Switching to a campus program later provided a clearer routine and quicker feedback, which helped restore momentum and confidence. This shift underscored how real-time connections and accountability can be decisive factors in completing the degree, especially when external pressures threaten progress.
How Does Each Sports Analytics Learning Format Affect Student Success?
Student success in a sports analytics degree hinges more on how the learning format fits an individual's study habits, time constraints, and life obligations than on the mode itself. Each format-online, hybrid, and campus-presents distinct environments that can either support or hinder a student's progress based on their personal context. For example, a working adult balancing family responsibilities might thrive in a flexible online program but struggle without strong self-discipline and support, whereas a recent high school graduate may benefit from the structured setting of a campus program. Below are key ways these learning formats shape academic achievement and degree completion.
- Access to academic support: Campus programs typically provide immediate, in-person access to faculty and tutoring, which significantly boosts persistence and grades. Hybrid students benefit moderately, while online learners often face delays in feedback unless institutions actively enhance virtual advising, which is critical since 2024 data from the National Student Clearinghouse indicates campus students have about 15% higher completion rates than online peers.
- Social engagement and peer interaction: Face-to-face learning fosters community and accountability, reinforcing motivation. Students who value interpersonal connections may perform better in campus or hybrid setups. Conversely, fully online students risk feeling isolated unless they pursue virtual study groups or social platforms designed to build cohesion.
- Flexibility versus structure: Online formats offer unmatched scheduling flexibility, which suits part-time or working students. However, this can lead to lower completion rates if learners lack self-regulation. Hybrid formats balance flexibility with scheduled in-person check-ins, aiding those needing some external deadlines to stay on track.
- Managing competing responsibilities: Adult learners often choose online sports analytics degrees to juggle work and family. Success depends on their ability to integrate study into complex schedules, whereas younger, full-time students may gain more from immersion in campus environments focused solely on academics.
- Technology and resource accessibility: Students in online programs must reliably access digital tools and stable internet. Technical challenges can create barriers that impact timely completion, while campus attendees generally have direct access to labs and software needed for analytics work.
- Learning preference alignment: Students with a preference for hands-on experiences and immediate dialogue tend to excel in campus or hybrid settings. Those who are independent learners and highly motivated can leverage online environments effectively if self-directed learning suits their style.
- Institutional support initiatives: Colleges expanding virtual counseling, peer networks, and interactive platforms have narrowed the success gap for online programs. Continuous improvements in online pedagogy can enhance engagement, making online sports analytics degrees viable-especially when paired with clear academic guidance.
How Does Enrollment Status Affect Sports Analytics Completion Rates?
Enrollment status is one of the most critical factors shaping degree completion rates in sports analytics programs, but its impact depends largely on the individual student's circumstances rather than simply the number of courses taken. Full-time students typically show higher completion rates, yet for many, part-time is the only feasible option due to work or family commitments. Recognizing how enrollment status interacts with personal obligations and learning environments is essential for setting realistic expectations and choosing a sustainable path. Below are key ways enrollment status influences sports analytics completion rates, informed by recent research.
- Structured engagement fosters momentum: Full-time enrollment usually involves scheduled classes and consistent study routines, which help students maintain steady progress. Those who thrive with routine and fewer external demands may find full-time pacing best supports completion.
- Balancing responsibilities impacts persistence: Part-time students often juggle employment, family, and coursework simultaneously, increasing the risk of attrition. Prospective students should assess whether they have sufficient support and time management skills before committing to part-time study.
- Program format interacts with enrollment status: Campus environments provide structured support that benefits full-time students, while hybrid and online formats offer flexibility appealing to part-time learners but require strong self-discipline to avoid delays in completion.
- Feelings of isolation challenge online persistence: Part-time online students can face reduced social and academic engagement, which may lower retention. Utilization of digital support services can help mitigate this but does not eliminate the challenge entirely.
- Career integration varies by pace: Part-time students often gain relevant work experience alongside their studies, potentially enhancing employability upon graduation. Conversely, full-time students may enter the job market faster but with less concurrent professional exposure.
- Completion rate disparities are significant: Data from the National Center for Education Statistics show full-time students in sports analytics and related STEM fields complete their degrees at rates up to 20% higher within standard timeframes compared to part-time students, underscoring the importance of enrollment decisions aligned with lifestyle.
- Individual goal alignment is crucial: Choosing between full-time and part-time must consider long-term academic and career objectives, recognizing that enrollment status interacts with external pressures and personal habits to affect success.
For students weighing their options amid different delivery methods, exploring models such as online degree social media marketing programs can provide insights into how part-time and flexible formats accommodate various lifestyles while highlighting the tradeoffs in completion rates and engagement.

Can Transfer Credits Improve Sports Analytics Degree Completion?
Transfer credits have the potential to shorten the time needed to complete a sports analytics degree, but their impact varies significantly based on individual circumstances. Students entering with relevant credits-whether from community colleges, military training, or previous higher education-can often bypass introductory courses, reducing duplicate coursework and accelerating progress toward graduation.
However, the benefits of transfer credits depend heavily on how well those credits align with program requirements. For instance, a student transferring into an online sports analytics program with a solid foundation in statistics and computer science may find that many credits apply directly to core coursework, enabling a faster path to degree completion. In contrast, a hybrid program's transfer policies might be more restrictive, due to a mix of in-person and online curriculum demands that limit which credits are accepted.
Campus-based programs often enforce stricter articulation agreements and prerequisites, which can make transferring credits a complex process. While these policies maintain academic rigor and cohort cohesion, they may reduce the number of transferable courses, potentially extending the time to finish the degree for incoming transfers. Yet on-campus learners benefit from more direct faculty support and resources that can enhance retention and completion, balancing out this disadvantage.
A recent 2024 report from the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center highlights that students who successfully transfer credits are about 30% more likely to graduate within six years compared to those without transfer credits. This statistic underscores the tangible advantage of credit transfer but also signals that transfer credits alone do not guarantee faster completion.
Prospective students should carefully assess whether their previous coursework aligns with the program's core and elective requirements. Obtaining an official credit evaluation and comparing the remaining credit load against their intended study pace are critical steps. This evaluation helps clarify if accepting transfer credits will truly reduce their time-to-degree or if other factors, such as course sequencing or experiential learning needs, might limit the impact.
In sum, while transfer credits can be a valuable tool to improve degree completion rates, especially for non-traditional learners balancing multiple commitments, they represent just one factor among many that influence timely graduation in sports analytics programs.
What Student Support Services Improve Sports Analytics Completion Rates?
Degree completion in sports analytics programs varies notably across online, hybrid, and campus formats, driven in large part by the tailored student support services available. Persistent challenges like isolation in online settings or balancing workload on campus require different resources to boost persistence. Recent data from 2024 by EDUCAUSE and the National Center for Education Statistics show that students engaging deeply with advising, mental health, and career-related supports demonstrate up to 15% higher completion rates. Below are key services linked to improved outcomes.
- Flexible academic advising: Personalized, accessible advising helps students navigate course selection and degree requirements, especially in online programs. Students able to schedule virtual meetings that fit their work or family commitments maintain a clearer path and stronger accountability.
- Peer mentoring and community building: Hybrid students benefit from programs combining on-campus interaction and online forums. These foster knowledge exchange and emotional support, helping to counteract detachment and enhance engagement.
- Mental health counseling availability: On-campus access to counselors and remote options reduce stressors that can derail progress. Structured study groups paired with counseling effectively support students managing demanding schedules.
- Asynchronous tutoring services: For remote learners, tutoring that fits varied schedules helps close skill gaps without forcing rigid times, critical for those juggling jobs or family roles.
- Career integration and experiential learning: Virtual internships and data-centric projects contextualize the curriculum, reinforcing motivation by linking studies with real-world sports analytics employment.
Each student's needs vary, so no single support guarantees success; rather, a flexible ecosystem addressing academic, emotional, and professional dimensions proves most effective. One online sports analytics graduate recalled feeling overwhelmed midway through the program due to conflicting work deadlines and a lack of real-time feedback. Access to a responsive advisor who suggested asynchronous tutoring sessions and connected her with a peer mentor helped her regain footing. That multifaceted support not only eased her stress but also kept her on track to finish, illustrating how integrated services meet complex challenges faced by nontraditional learners.
How Do Sports Analytics Completion Rates Affect Career Outcomes?
Degree completion rates in sports analytics programs directly influence graduates' career trajectories in ways that extend beyond mere credentialing. The rigorous, data-driven nature of the field means employers often equate finishing a sports analytics degree with an applicant's analytical capability and dedication to learning. Completion not only signals foundational knowledge mastery but also tends to improve access to networks and experiential learning, critical for navigating the competitive sports analytics labor market. Below are key career outcomes shaped by finishing a sports analytics degree:
- Higher employment stability and earnings growth: Graduates who complete their sports analytics degrees demonstrate significantly better employment outcomes, with data from a 2024 National Center for Education Statistics report showing bachelor's degree holders have a 15% higher employment rate and earn roughly 30% more than those without a degree. Persistence through to graduation is particularly beneficial for students aiming for roles with professional sports teams or media companies. Employers value the analytical rigor behind a completed program as evidence of commitment and skill reliability.
- Enhanced promotion and advancement opportunities: Completion distinguishes candidates for internal promotions and leadership tracks in sports tech firms and analytics departments. Employers prioritize degree holders when considering candidates for roles requiring complex data interpretation and strategic decision-making. Students balancing work and study in hybrid formats often see employment gains by applying real-time experience alongside academic learning.
- Increased likelihood of graduate education enrollment: Completing a bachelor's in sports analytics positively correlates with pursuing advanced degrees, which is often necessary for specialized research or high-level analytics roles. According to recent labor market analyses, degree completers are 25% more likely to enroll in graduate programs, extending their long-term career flexibility.
- Access to practical internships and professional networks: Campus and hybrid formats generally offer superior networking and internship opportunities, critical for breaking into elite sports analytics positions. Completion ensures students can leverage these connections fully, strengthening post-graduation job prospects. Those enrolled in flexible online programs should weigh these tradeoffs carefully.
Given these outcomes, prospective students are encouraged to assess their personal learning preferences relative to completion risks. Programs identified among good online colleges for military demonstrate how structured support boosts online completion rates, reflecting the broader challenge of balancing flexibility with persistence in sports analytics degree completion rates and career success.
How Should Students Choose the Best Sports Analytics Learning Format?
Choosing the best sports analytics degree format hinges on aligning educational delivery with personal, professional, and motivational factors that influence completion rates and long-term success. Recent 2024 data from the National Center for Education Statistics highlight that degree completion rates vary significantly by format, largely shaped by student characteristics and work commitments. Campus programs generally report higher completion due to structured interaction and peer accountability, while online programs provide greater flexibility but often face challenges like student isolation. Hybrid formats can offer a strategic compromise. Below are key factors prospective students should weigh when choosing their ideal learning format.
- Time Availability and Work Commitments: Students working full-time or with demanding schedules often benefit from the flexibility of online or hybrid models. However, the absence of fixed class times requires stronger self-discipline, as indicated by lower completion rates among fully online learners in some studies.
- Self-Motivation and Discipline: Campus programs offer built-in routines and immediate access to faculty, which help sustain motivation. Students who struggle with independent study may find on-campus formats more conducive to staying on track.
- Learning Style and Peer Interaction: Those who thrive on direct mentoring and collaborative environments generally perform better in campus settings, where immersion in peer networks can enhance engagement and accountability.
- Geographic and Personal Constraints: Hybrid and online programs reduce barriers related to location or family responsibilities, expanding access for students facing travel, health, or caregiving challenges.
- Long-Term Employability Considerations: While all formats can lead to similar credentials, campus and hybrid experiences may better facilitate networking opportunities and practical skill application, which can impact job readiness.
- Resource Availability and Support Services: Students should assess what academic support and career services each format offers, as online learners often need to proactively seek such resources to mitigate attrition risks.
- Program Structure and Content Delivery: Some sports analytics curricula demand hands-on projects or labs better suited to in-person formats, influencing completion success if a program's teaching methods fit the chosen format.
For students seeking a comprehensive view of program options, a reputable master in data analytics resource can provide valuable comparative insights. Ultimately, realistic assessment of these factors against individual circumstances and goals remains critical when choosing the best sports analytics degree format to maximize both completion rates and career outcomes.
What Are the Long-Term Pros and Cons of Each Sports Analytics Learning Format?
Choosing between online, hybrid, and campus formats for a sports analytics degree requires assessing how each impacts completion rates, career readiness, and long-term outcomes. Campus programs typically lead with the highest graduation rates due to structured environments and hands-on engagement. Hybrid formats balance flexibility and in-person skills building, offering moderate completion improvements over fully online options. Fully online programs provide accessibility but can challenge practical skill development and completion consistency. Consider these key long-term factors when evaluating your path:
- Completion Rates and Structure: Campus programs show completion rates up to 15% higher than online, thanks to face-to-face support and scheduled activities, benefiting students who thrive on routine. Hybrid formats improve retention by blending flexibility with accountability, while fully online formats require strong self-motivation, often leading to lower graduation rates.
- Hands-On Experience and Employer Alignment: Campus environments offer immersive team projects and on-site data analysis critical for roles needing collaboration and real-time problem-solving. Hybrid programs partially replicate this, whereas online learners may need extra internships to gain comparable practical skills.
- Career Networking Opportunities: On-campus settings facilitate direct networking with faculty and industry partners, a proven advantage in sports analytics job placement. Hybrid students gain some access, but fully online learners must rely heavily on virtual networking tools.
- Flexibility and Accessibility: Online degrees excel in accessibility for working professionals or remote students, allowing pace adjustment. Hybrid formats provide balanced scheduling, while campus programs demand commuting or relocation, impacting some students' feasibility.
- Self-Regulation and Learning Skills Development: Hybrid and online students develop critical self-discipline and time management, enhancing long-term professional attributes. Campus learners may benefit less in these areas but gain stronger interpersonal and teamwork skills from in-person interaction.
References:
- Sport Analytics, Master of Science, (M.S.) https://catalog.lipscomb.edu/preview_program.php
- Top Sports Analytics Courses for 2025 | Boost Your Career - SportsJobs Online https://www.sportsjobs.online/blogposts/40
- Online Student Trends and Success Factors - OnlineEducation.com https://www.onlineeducation.com/guide/who-studies-online
- Awesome Jobs You Can Score With a Sports Analytics Degree https://www.workinsports.com/resourcecenter/jobseeker/pages/awesome-jobs-you-can-score-with-a-sports-analytics-degree
- Sport Analytics https://www.swansea.ac.uk/science-and-engineering/research/zienkiewicz-institute-for-modelling-data-ai/research/specialist-areas/sport-analytics/
- Sports Analytics: A Complete Handbook for Organizations https://b-eye.com/blog/sports-analytics-a-complete-handbook-for-organizations/
- Sports Analytics Jobs (with Salaries) - SEEK https://au.seek.com/sports-analytics-jobs
- Winning With Data: How Sports Analytics Can Transform K–8 STEM Learning - STEM Sports https://stemsports.com/winning-with-data-how-sports-analytics-can-transform-k-8-stem-learning/
- Graduate Certificate in Data Analytics for Sport Performance https://www.vu.edu.au/courses/graduate-certificate-in-data-analytics-for-sport-performance-stsp
- Top 5 Sports Analytics Courses to Kickstart Your Career https://www.mckayjohns.com/blog/top-sports-analytics-courses
Other Things You Should Know About Sports Analytics
Online sports analytics programs offer unmatched scheduling flexibility, which can help students balance work and study. However, this flexibility often leads to inconsistent engagement, as students may struggle to maintain a disciplined routine without in-person accountability. This inconsistency can lower completion rates because successful mastery of sports analytics requires continuous practice with data tools and iterative project work. Students prioritizing schedule control should assess their self-motivation critically before choosing the online format.
Hybrid programs combine online coursework with scheduled campus sessions, typically providing structured opportunities for hands-on data analysis and group collaboration. This blend can improve completion rates by addressing the practical demands of sports analytics, such as using complex software and interpreting real-time sports data, which are harder to replicate fully online. For students who find purely online formats isolating or lacking in practical exposure, hybrid models often offer a better equilibrium that supports persistence through challenging applied coursework.
Employers in the sports analytics field sometimes view fully online degrees with skepticism, especially for entry-level roles requiring teamwork and real-world problem solving. Completion from a campus program can provide more direct networking opportunities and collaborative projects, which employers associate with readiness for complex, dynamic workflows. Hybrid programs often strike a middle ground, offering evidence of both independent digital skills and in-person collaboration, which can be a strategic advantage in job searches-thus influencing the real-world payoff of completion and its impact on career trajectories.
Students juggling demanding jobs typically face higher dropout risks, but hybrid programs can mitigate this by structuring essential hands-on learning into set times, promoting a disciplined schedule while retaining some flexibility. Fully online programs may offer more hourly flexibility but lack sufficient engagement checkpoints, increasing the risk of falling behind. Therefore, students balancing work should prioritize hybrid formats when possible, as these programs better integrate career needs with the intensive practical requirements critical to finishing a sports analytics degree successfully.
