World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Springer

ECCV 2021 : European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)

Location: Montreal , Canada

Submission deadline: 3/10/2021

Conference dates: 10/11/2021 - 10/11/2021

Research H-index
157

Ranking & Metrics

Discipline name Position Best Scientists Publications D-Index
Computer Science 4 896 1090 157

Call for Papers

Papers in the main technical program must describe high-quality, original research. Topics of interest include the following aspects of computer vision and pattern recognition:

3D from a single image and shape-from-x
Action and behavior recognition
Adversarial learning
Biometrics
Computational photography
Datasets and evaluation
Detection and localization in 2D and 3D
Efficient training and inference methods
Explainable AI
Faces
Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in vision
Gestures and body pose
Image and video synthesis
Image and video retrieval
Image and video manipulation detection and integrity methods.
Low-level and physics-based vision
Machine learning architectures and formulations
Medical, biological, and cell microscopy
Motion and tracking
Neural generative models
Optimization and learning methods
Recognition and classification
Representation learning
Scene analysis and understanding
Scene text and document understanding
Segmentation, grouping and shape
Stereo, 3D from multiview and other sensors
Transfer/Low-shot/Semi/Unsupervised Learning
Video analysis and understanding
Vision + language
Vision + other modalities
Vision applications and systems
Vision for robotics and autonomous vehicles
Visual reasoning and logical representation

Overview

The scientific conference ranking presented on this page highlights the most prestigious conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology. This comprehensive ranking has been meticulously prepared by Research.com, a renowned platform recognized for delivering authoritative data on scientific contributions across all major disciplines since 2014, including Engineering and Technology. Research.com is widely trusted by the global academic and scientific community for its commitment to accuracy and integrity.

The positions of the conferences in this ranking are determined by a unique bibliometric score developed exclusively by Research.com. This score is computed using an advanced methodology that considers the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have contributed to each conference over the preceding three years. This multifaceted approach ensures that the ranking reflects both the impact and the quality of scientific discourse facilitated by each event.

The Impact Score values included in this ranking were collected as of 2024-11-27, representing the most current assessment available. The ranking process involved an exhaustive evaluation of more than 2,262 conferences, each of which was selected after an in-depth examination and rigorous review of over 26,934 scientific documents published within the last three years. Contributions from 9,385 highly respected and accomplished scientists in the Engineering and Technology sector were analyzed to ensure comprehensive coverage and reliability of the data.

This rigorous and data-driven approach underscores the depth of expertise and the complexity of the analytical process undertaken by our team of experts. For further information regarding the methodology and detailed criteria used for ranking, please refer to our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

The top authors publishing at European Conference on Computer Vision (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Luc Van Gool (87 papers) published 22 papers at the last edition, 8 more than at the previous edition,
  • Andrew Zisserman (62 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Ming-Hsuan Yang (50 papers) published 11 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
  • Marc Pollefeys (42 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
  • Philip H. S. Torr (40 papers) published 9 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at European Conference on Computer Vision (based on the number of publications) are:

  • Microsoft (254 papers) published 44 papers at the last edition, 17 more than at the previous edition,
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (189 papers) published 90 papers at the last edition, 53 more than at the previous edition,
  • French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (186 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
  • Carnegie Mellon University (179 papers) published 44 papers at the last edition, 13 more than at the previous edition,
  • ETH Zurich (168 papers) published 53 papers at the last edition, 23 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2020 edition, 3.49% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 26.60% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 12.20% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.88% of all publications and 41.32% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

  • Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
  • Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
  • Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
  • Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
  • Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science online offers flexibility and affordability, making it an attractive option for many students. Exploring computer science degrees can provide insight into programs that balance cost with quality education, helping students choose the best fit for their goals.

For those with a military background, specialized programs like the best military friendly online cybersecurity degrees offer tailored support and resources. These degrees focus on cybersecurity skills in high demand across government and private sectors, making them ideal for veterans transitioning to civilian careers.

As technology evolves, new roles such as AI Trainers are emerging. Learning about how to become an AI trainer, including typical salaries and career paths, can help students and professionals tap into this growing field and develop skills needed to guide artificial intelligence systems effectively.

Additionally, short-term learning options like online cyber security courses provide certificates that boost employability and specialized knowledge without the time commitment of full degrees. These courses are perfect for those seeking to quickly upskill or transition into cybersecurity roles.

Best Scientists who published in this Conference

Related Articles

Recently Published Articles