| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microbiology | 217 | 14 | 10 | 9 |
The primary areas of discussion in the journal are Botany, Taxonomy (biology), Genus, Phylogenetic tree and Phylogenetics. While work presented in Studies in Mycology provided substantial information on Botany, it also covered topics in Zoology and Internal transcribed spacer. While Zoology is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Pleosporales and Dothideomycetes.
In the journal, researchers investigate the Taxonomy (biology) study as part of research in the field of Ecology. The research on Genus tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Hyphomycetes, Polyphyly, Mycosphaerella and Molecular phylogenetics. The journal addresses concerns in the field of Mycosphaerella by exploring it in line with topics in Teratosphaeriaceae which intersect with Capnodiales subjects.
Some problems in Phylogenetic tree that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Evolutionary biology and Systematics. Phylogenetics and Species complex are closely related fields of research discussed in Studies in Mycology. Aspergillus research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Eurotiales and Subgenus.
The journal publications are mainly concerned with subjects like Botany, Genus, Taxonomy (biology), Phylogenetic tree and Aspergillus. The published articles with studies in Botany featured incorporate elements of Zoology and Phylogenetics, Clade. The most cited articles tackle studies in Evolutionary biology and the interrelated subject of Molecular phylogenetics, Kwoniella and Tremellomycetes to gain insights into Phylogenetic tree.
The journal is organized to address concerns in the fields of Xylaria hypoxylon, Aspergillosis, Antifungal drugs, Diagnostic tools and Intensive care medicine. The Xylaria hypoxylon works featured in the journal incorporate elements from Gene cluster, Gene, Secondary metabolite and Computational biology. The journal explores issues in Computational biology which can be linked to other research areas like Genome, Comparative genomics and Metabolomics.
Issues in Aspergillosis were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Aspergillus fumigatus and Amphotericin B.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Studies in Mycology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Studies in Mycology (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 100.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
J. Houbraken;S. Kocsubé;C.M. Visagie;N. Yilmaz
(2020)P.W. Crous;P.W. Crous;L. Lombard;M. Sandoval-Denis;K.A. Seifert
(2021)S. Haridas;R. Albert;R. Albert;M. Binder;J. Bloem
(2020)A. Arastehfar;A. Carvalho;J. Houbraken;L. Lombardi
(2021)Unknown
(2022)L.W. Hou;J.Z. Groenewald;L.H. Pfenning;O. Yarden
(2020)S. Mongkolsamrit;A. Khonsanit;D. Thanakitpipattana;K. Tasanathai
(2020)J. Abdollahzadeh;J.Z. Groenewald;Martin Petrus Albertus Coetzee;Michael J. Wingfield
(2020)Exploring Plant Science and Agronomy opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which benefit from complementary online degrees. Students interested in agriculture and human health may find programs like an accelerated fnp pathway useful, especially for those looking to merge plant-based knowledge with healthcare roles.
For professionals seeking advanced clinical roles, transitioning through msn to dnp online programs can provide a flexible pathway while maintaining a focus on nutrition’s impact on patient care. This complements agronomic expertise by deepening an understanding of diet and health.
Nutrition plays a critical role in the broader ecosystem of plant science. Pursuing an online masters in nutrition and dietetics offers a specialized avenue for students aiming to influence food systems, public health, and sustainable agriculture practices.
Additionally, an online nutritionist degree can serve as an excellent foundation for those wanting to understand the relationship between plant-based foods and human nutrition, paving the way toward careers in food policy, wellness coaching, and agricultural science research.
