| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 72 | 941 | 1453 | 69 |
The main points discussed in the journal deals with Metallurgy, Composite material, Microstructure, Alloy and Crystallography. The Metallurgy study tackled is a key component of adjacent topics in the area of Phase (matter). Ceramic, Deformation (engineering), Composite number, Plasticity and Amorphous metal are all subfields of Composite material research that were featured in the journal.
Discussions in the journal are anchored in the subject of Ceramic and the similar topic of Sintering. Studies on Microstructure discussed in Scripta Materialia link to the field of Annealing (metallurgy). The studies in Alloy featured incorporate elements of Ductility, Precipitation (chemistry), Aluminium and Thermodynamics.
Scripta Materialia focuses on Crystallography but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Transmission electron microscopy, Condensed matter physics and Diffraction. Scripta Materialia connects the study in Grain boundary with the closely related area of Grain growth.
The published articles mainly tackle studies in Metallurgy, Composite material, Microstructure, Alloy and Crystallography. The most cited articles with studies in Microstructure featured incorporate elements of Intermetallic, Annealing (metallurgy), Phase (matter), Transmission electron microscopy and Electron diffraction. The most cited publications hold forums on Alloy that merge themes from other disciplines such as Ductility and Precipitation (chemistry).
The journal aims to foster the development of research in Composite material, Alloy, Microstructure, Grain boundary and Ductility. Some problems in Alloy that were presented in it overlapped with concepts under Texture (crystalline), Precipitation (chemistry), Phase (matter), Aluminium and Entropy (classical thermodynamics). While work presented in it provided substantial information on Phase (matter), it also covered topics in Crystallography, Coupling (piping) and Density functional theory.
Microstructure studies tackled cover an aspect of the field of Metallurgy. It facilitates discussions on Grain boundary that incorporate concepts from other fields like Atom probe, Austenite, Thermodynamics, Nucleation and Annealing (metallurgy). Issues in Ductility were discussed, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Tensile testing and Refractory (planetary science).
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Scripta Materialia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Scripta Materialia (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2022 edition, 16.48% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 26.32% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.53% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.84% of all publications and 51.32% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Yiping Lu;Yong Dong;Hui Jiang;Zhijun Wang
(2020)Ting Xiong;Ting Xiong;Shijian Zheng;Shijian Zheng;Jingyu Pang;Jingyu Pang;Xiuliang Ma;Xiuliang Ma
(2020)Abhishek Sarkar;Ben Breitung;Horst Hahn
(2020)Mingliang Wang;Yiping Lu;Tongmin Wang;Chuan Zhang
(2021)Andrew J. Wright;Qingyang Wang;Shu Ting Ko;Ka Man Chung
(2020)Parisa Edalati;Ricardo Floriano;Abbas Mohammadi;Yongtao Li;Yongtao Li
(2020)Xuehui Yan;Yong Zhang;Yong Zhang
(2020)Ke Ren;Ke Ren;Qiankun Wang;Qiankun Wang;Gang Shao;Xiaofeng Zhao
(2020)Evan Ma
(2020)Exploring Materials Science often opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career options. For those seeking flexible learning, programs similar to a photography degree online for veterans demonstrate how specialized education can cater to unique needs and backgrounds, highlighting the importance of accessible online degrees.
Materials Science professionals often work in focused, detail-oriented roles, making it an ideal fit for individuals who thrive in quieter, independent environments. Careers aligned with the introvert jobs category can offer fulfilling pathways that complement the analytical nature of this field.
Moreover, understanding diverse career options is crucial. For instance, healthcare sectors like becoming a child life specialist showcase how science and empathy converge in specialized roles. Similarly, degree advancement options such as bsn to msn programs reflect the growing trend of online education bridging foundational knowledge with advanced expertise.
By considering these varied online degree opportunities and career paths, students and professionals in Materials Science can tailor their journeys to fit personal interests, strengths, and life circumstances.
