Internal Medicine Journal

Top Research Topics at Internal Medicine Journal?

Internal Medicine Journal tackles a plethora of topics, such as Internal medicine, Surgery, Intensive care medicine, MEDLINE and Pediatrics. Gastroenterology, Oncology and Cardiology are some topics wherein Internal medicine research discussed in Internal Medicine Journal have an impact. The study on Retrospective cohort study presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Emergency medicine.

• Internal medicine (27.12%)
• Surgery (12.42%)
• Intensive care medicine (11.86%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• Diabetes as a risk factor for dementia and mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. (548 citations)
• Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn (490 citations)
• Antecedents to hospital deaths. (354 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Internal Medicine Journal:

The most cited articles are organized to address concerns in the fields of Internal medicine, Surgery, Intensive care medicine, Disease and Pediatrics. The journal publications with studies in Internal medicine featured incorporate elements of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Cardiology. Aside from discussions in Intensive care medicine, the published articles also deal with the subject of MEDLINE which intersects with Nursing disciplines.

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Internal medicine
• Disease
• Cancer

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal generally zeroes in on subjects such as Internal medicine, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), MEDLINE, Emergency medicine and Retrospective cohort study. The journal facilitates discussions on Internal medicine that incorporate concepts from other fields like Gastroenterology and Oncology. The studies in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) featured incorporate elements of Telehealth, Family medicine and Medical emergency.

The work tackled in it goes beyond the discipline of MEDLINE as it also encompasses Intensive care medicine. Many of the studies tackled connect Retrospective cohort study with a similar field of study like Intensive care unit. The Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) study featured in the journal draws parallels with the field of 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak.

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Health status and healthcare trends of individuals accessing Australian aged care programmes over a decade: the Registry of Senior Australians historical cohort (11 citations)
• Telehealth in cancer care: during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. (6 citations)
• Antithrombin III as predictive indicator of survival in IPF patients treated with Nintedanib: a preliminary study (6 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Internal Medicine Journal (based on the number of publications) are:

• Ian A Scott (70 papers) published 4 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Jeff Szer (70 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Ian Kerridge (55 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition, 5 less than at the previous edition,
• Paul A. Komesaroff (46 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Jennifer H. Martin (32 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Internal Medicine Journal (based on the number of publications) are:

• Monash University (549 papers) published 78 papers at the last edition, 17 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Melbourne (462 papers) published 79 papers at the last edition, 27 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Sydney (426 papers) published 49 papers at the last edition, 4 less than at the previous edition,
• St. Vincent's Health System (367 papers) published 31 papers at the last edition, 6 more than at the previous edition,
• Royal Melbourne Hospital (343 papers) published 39 papers at the last edition, 12 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 8.99% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 62.35% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.06% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 11.29% of all publications and 19.29% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Linkages with Nurse Practitioner Programs

One vital yet unaddressed aspect is the intersection of the themes addressed in the Internal Medicine Journal, especially in regards to MEDLINE and Intensive Care Medicine, with the curriculum and knowledge expected from Nurse Practitioner students in medical schools. This can be particularly relevant for aspiring practitioners eyeing programs which ensure extensive exposure and specialization in these areas. In this context, the Nurse Practitioner Programs offered in Louisiana stand out, being consistently recognized for their comprehensive curriculum that incorporates varied facets of Internal Medicine, Intensive Care, and the use of resources like MEDLINE. Students enrolled in these programs stand to benefit from correlating the research themes of Internal Medicine Journal to their academic learnings and gaining deeper insights into practical application scenarios. For those interested in exploring these education programs further, details can be found in these highly-regarded nurse practitioner programs in Louisiana. The course outlines here align well with the key internal medicine topics discussed, enabling students to gain substantial knowledge which could contribute to their competencies in the field of healthcare in the future.