| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microbiology | 1 | 1000 | 2089 | 119 |
| Medicine | 21 | 1397 | 2568 | 120 |
Clinical Infectious Diseases covers a variety of subjects, including Internal medicine, Immunology, Virology, Microbiology and Surgery. The research on Internal medicine tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Gastroenterology and Antibiotics. The study on Antibiotics presented is investigated in conjunction with research in Intensive care medicine.
It facilitates discussions on Immunology that incorporate concepts from other fields like Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and Disease. The majority of Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) studies presented zero in on Sida. More specifically, the research on Virology in it is related to Virus.
Bacteremia is a major topic of Microbiology research. Clinical Infectious Diseases explores issues in Incidence (epidemiology) which can be linked to other research areas like Epidemiology and Pediatrics. It dives deep in exploring the relationship between the study of Viral disease and Immunopathology.
The published articles mainly deal with areas of study such as Internal medicine, Immunology, Surgery, Microbiology and Intensive care medicine. The journal articles explore issues in Internal medicine which can be linked to other research areas like Gastroenterology, Antibacterial agent and Bacteremia. The Immunology research tackled in the published papers is interrelated with Epidemiology which concerns subjects like Incidence (epidemiology) and Pediatrics.
Internal medicine, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak and Virology are the subjects of interest in the journal. It focuses on Internal medicine research which is adjacent to topics in Gastroenterology. While the journal focused on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it was also able to explore topics like Public health, MEDLINE and Emergency medicine.
Most of the MEDLINE studies addressed also intersect with Intensive care medicine. Transmission (medicine), Asymptomatic and Coronavirus are some topics wherein Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) research discussed in the journal have an impact. Confidence interval research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Odds ratio and Demography.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Clinical Infectious Diseases (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Clinical Infectious Diseases (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 4.35% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 33.20% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.77% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 20.15% of all publications and 35.88% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Juanjuan Zhao;Quan Yuan;Haiyan Wang;Wei Liu
(2020)J. Peter Donnelly;Sharon C. Chen;Carol A. Kauffman;William J. Steinbach
(2020)Kelvin Kai Wang To;Kelvin Kai Wang To;Kelvin Kai Wang To;Owen Tak Yin Tsang;Cyril Chik-Yan Yip;Cyril Chik-Yan Yip;Kwok Hung Chan
(2020)Li Guo;Lili Ren;Siyuan Yang;Meng Xiao
(2020)Timothy M Rawson;Timothy M Rawson;Luke S P Moore;Luke S P Moore;Nina Zhu;Nishanthy Ranganathan;Nishanthy Ranganathan
(2020)Andrea Giacomelli;Laura Pezzati;Federico Conti;Dario Bernacchia
(2020)Jared Bullard;Jared Bullard;Kerry Dust;Duane Funk;Duane Funk;James E Strong;James E Strong
(2020)For those interested in expanding their medical careers beyond traditional medicine, many online nursing degrees offer flexible and accessible pathways. Programs like the chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program provide a comparison of reputable options for Registered Nurses looking to advance their education to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) online. These programs are designed to accommodate working professionals without sacrificing quality.
Further advancement is possible with programs that bridge the gap between a BSN and a Master of Science in Nursing (MSN). Exploring the bsn to msn online programs reveals some of the most affordable and flexible options, allowing practitioners to specialize in nursing leadership, administration, or clinical practice while maintaining their current roles.
For those seeking the convenience of learning at their own pace with minimal disruption, look into the best rn to bsn online programs that offer no clinical requirements. These provide an efficient path to credential advancement without the need for on-site clinical hours, making it ideal for busy professionals.
Lastly, for nurses aiming at the highest level of clinical expertise, the fastest dnp program offers accelerated options toward a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in healthcare delivery and advanced clinical practice in a streamlined timeframe.
