Published by: MDPI
| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biology and Biochemistry | 260 | 129 | 159 | 23 |
| Engineering and Technology | 501 | 85 | 115 | 16 |
The aim of the journal is to expand the discussion of research in Biomedical engineering, Tissue engineering, Cell biology, Nanotechnology and Extracellular matrix. Bioengineering explores research in Tissue engineering and the adjacent study of Scaffold. The Cell biology study tackling the subject of Mesenchymal stem cell is the focus of it.
The main points discussed in the published papers deal with Nanotechnology, Polyhydroxyalkanoates, Waste management, Tissue engineering and Biochemical engineering. While Nanotechnology is the key highlight in the published articles, thet also covered some subjects on 3D printing and Dose adjustment and Risk analysis (engineering). While the primary focus in the journal papers is Wound healing, they also dissect topics surrounding Wound debridement and Biomedical engineering as a whole.
The journal aims to foster the development of research in Biomedical engineering, Tissue engineering, Cell biology, Extracellular matrix and Cell. The journal is mostly focused on Biomedical engineering, specifically Scaffold. Specifically, studies on 3D bioprinting are prevalent in the Tissue engineering works discussed.
Cell biology research presented is mostly focused on the subject of Stem cell. While work presented in the journal provided substantial information on Stem cell, it also covered topics in Mesenchymal stem cell and Induced pluripotent stem cell.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Bioengineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Bioengineering (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 4.93% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 13.33% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 10.37% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.33% of all publications and 62.96% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Collaborations and partnerships significantly contribute to innovation, and the reach of research in the field of Bioengineering. Many of the groundbreaking studies published in this journal have been the result of synergies between researchers, institutions, and sometimes, between different disciplines altogether. In fact, interdisciplinary articles and those that result from notable collaborations often find themselves the most cited.
An expansive network of collaborations enables the enhancement of knowledge and expertise. The opportunity for researchers to work together facilitates the blending of different perspectives and fosters innovation. These partnerships often extend beyond national borders, building a global knowledge base in bioengineering research.
One of the notable collaborations that have contributed to significant studies published in the journal is between medical schools and bioengineering departments. These collaborations result in an interdisciplinary approach, combining medical practicality and engineering innovation. In particular, medical assistant training programs have a significant impact on biomedical engineering studies. For instance, the medical assistant training in Iowa embeds bioengineering principles, which help future medical professionals understand the technology and devices they will work with.
The impact of such collaborations is not limited to academic circles; they have real-world implications as well. Collaborations contribute greatly to advances in healthcare, developing new diagnostic devices, therapeutic strategies, and increasing overall patient care quality.
Thiago R Bjerk;Patricia Severino;Sona Jain;Conrado Marques
(2021)Milad Ashrafizadeh;Kiavash Hushmandi;Ebrahim Rahmani Moghadam;Vahideh Zarrin
(2020)For students interested in Biology and Biochemistry, exploring interdisciplinary fields such as counseling and psychology can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals leverage their scientific background to support mental health and developmental research or clinical practice.
If you are considering further education, there are options like the most affordable online counseling degrees that provide flexible, cost-effective routes to gain expertise in counseling while maintaining your focus on science-based approaches.
For those focused on mental health care, pursuing an online masters in mental health counseling can accelerate your transition into clinical roles. These programs balance scientific foundations with psychological applications to prepare students for licensure and practice.
Alternatively, specializing in developmental psychology through a child psychology masters program helps bridge biology with behavioral science, ideal for careers in research, therapy, or education.
Many students also explore an online master's degree in counseling to gain credentials that enable counseling in various settings, combining scientific knowledge with practical skills.
These diverse degree options highlight how Biology and Biochemistry graduates can expand their career prospects by integrating counseling and psychological studies, enhancing their impact in health and science sectors.
