| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth Science | 339 | 58 | 80 | 10 |
| Chemistry | 984 | 15 | 33 | 4 |
The main points discussed in Archaeometry deals with Archaeology, Mineralogy, Pottery, Metallurgy and Provenance. Archaeology research presented in the journal encompasses a variety of subjects, including Petrography and Ancient history. Metallurgy studies presented include Copper, Ceramic and Bronze.
Research on Provenance presented in the journal concerns the broader topic of Geochemistry.
The main points discussed in the published articles deal with Archaeology, Mineralogy, Archaeological science, Pottery and Provenance. The journal papers facilitate discussions on Archaeology that incorporate concepts from other fields like Period (geology), Lead (geology) and Ancient history. The journal papers focus on Mineralogy but also tackle concerns of closely connected disciplines like
The journal facilitates discussions on Archaeology, Provenance, Ancient history, Pottery and Metallurgy. It explores topics in Archaeology which can be helpful for research in disciplines like White (horse) and Petrography. The study of Geochemistry serves as the foundation of the Provenance research discussed in Archaeometry.
Archaeometry explores issues in Geochemistry which can be linked to other research areas like Calcareous and Glaze. The Ancient history study featured in Archaeometry draws parallels with the field of La icp ms. The journal focuses on Pottery but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Period (geology) and Ceramic.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Archaeometry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Archaeometry (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 5.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 20.18% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.40% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.16% of all publications and 55.26% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
G. Artioli;C. Canovaro;P. Nimis;I. Angelini
(2020)R. Fenger‐Nielsen;B. Elberling;A. Kroon;A. Westergaard‐Nielsen
(2020)Shidong Chen;Signe Vahur;Anu Teearu;Taisi Juus
(2021)T. S. Daugbjerg;A. Lindroos;J. Heinemeier;Å. Ringbom
(2021)F Albarède;J Blichert-Toft;F de Callataÿ;F de Callataÿ;G Davis
(2021)L. G. Shewan;Richard Armstrong;Dougald O'Reilly
(2020)E. C. Velliky;E. C. Velliky;E. C. Velliky;B. L. MacDonald;M. Porr;M. Porr;N. J. Conard
(2021)Y. Z. Zhangsun;Y. Z. Zhangsun;Z. Y. Jin;F. Z. Feng;J. H. Tian
(2021)For those interested in pursuing Earth Science, online education offers flexible and accessible pathways. Many students, including veterans and active military personnel, benefit from programs designed to support their unique needs, such as those found when searching for an online college for military.
In addition to degrees, obtaining certifications can significantly boost career prospects. Exploring certifications for jobs related to Earth Science fields—such as environmental management or GIS mapping—can provide a competitive edge without the time commitment of a full degree program.
For professionals aiming to advance their careers, selecting a graduate program wisely is crucial. If time is a constraint, considering one of the shortest masters degree options can help achieve career goals efficiently.
Ultimately, choosing a degree that aligns with labor market demand is key. Many students prioritize masters degrees that are worth it—programs that offer both specialized knowledge and strong job placement opportunities in fields related to Earth Science.
