| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 164 | 57 | 104 | 13 |
The foci of Mycological Progress are Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Taxonomy (biology), Genus and Taxon. Topics in Botany were tackled in line with various other fields like Ribosomal DNA and Internal transcribed spacer. Mycological Progress connects research in Ribosomal DNA with the related topic of Intergenic region.
The Internal transcribed spacer research presented falls under the domain of Ribosomal RNA. In Mycological Progress, Evolutionary biology and Phylogenetics are investigated in conjunction with one another to address concerns in Phylogenetic tree research. The study on Taxonomy (biology) presented in the journal intersects with the topics under Molecular phylogenetics.
Type species is part of Genus studies tackled in it.
The published articles mainly tackle studies in Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Genus, Taxonomy (biology) and Phylogenetics. The journal articles are mostly focused on Botany, specifically Taxon. The works on Taxonomy (biology) tackled in the most cited articles bring together disciplines like Polyporales, Truffle and Molecular phylogenetics.
The aim of the journal is to expand the discussion of research in Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Genus, Taxon and Ecology. Concepts in Species complex, as well as related topics in Monophyly, are covered in the Botany research presented in the journal. Mycological Progress explores topics in Phylogenetic tree which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Host (biology) and Appendage.
While Genus is the focus of the journal, it also provided insights into the studies of Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Lineage (evolution) and Oomycete. It explores research in Phylogenetics and the adjacent study of Taxonomy (biology). Topics in Taxon explored in it were investigated in conjunction with research in Zoology, Morphology (biology), Pleosporales, Key (lock) and Type (biology).
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Mycological Progress (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Mycological Progress (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 24.42% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 32.31% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.69% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 15.38% of all publications and 44.62% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Marc Stadler;Christopher Lambert;Daniel Wibberg;Jörn Kalinowski
(2020)Yasmina Marin-Felix;Margarita Hernandez-Restrepo;Pedro W. Crous
(2020)Sara R. Noumeur;Rémy B. Teponno;Soleiman E. Helaly;Xue Wei Wang
(2020)Kaliane S. Araújo;Vanessa N. Brito;Tomás G. R. Veloso;Tiago S. de Leite
(2020)Himashi S. Ferdinandez;Dimuthu S. Manamgoda;Dhanushka Udayanga;Nelum Deshappriya
(2021)Niloofar Vaghefi;Susan M. Thompson;Rohan B. E. Kimber;Geoff J. Thomas
(2020)Mark Seasat Calabon;E.B. Gareth Jones;Kevin D. Hyde;Kevin D. Hyde;Saranyaphat Boonmee
(2021)Eugénio Diogo;Catarina I. Gonçalves;Ana C. Silva;Carlos Valente
(2021)Exploring online degrees in Plant Science and Agronomy often leads students to consider fast-tracked educational routes and career advancements in related fields. Just as accelerated nursing programs provide a quicker path to entering healthcare, similar accelerated programs can benefit those looking to fast-track their expertise in agricultural sciences and environmental studies.
For those interested in blending plant science knowledge with practical applications, understanding the fastest ways to achieve advanced qualifications is essential. Programs like the fastest way to become a nurse practitioner highlight how structured online courses can significantly shorten time to career entry, a principle applicable in various STEM fields.
Furthermore, just as the fastest rn to bsn program online offers an accelerated degree completion for nurses, online degrees in agronomy can offer flexible schedules that accommodate working professionals aiming to upskill quickly without sacrificing their current job responsibilities.
Bridge programs, such as those detailed in adn to np programs, serve as great models for educational pathways that support career progression. Similarly, pathways in Plant Science can guide students from foundational knowledge to specialized expertise, opening doors to diverse careers in agriculture, research, and sustainability.
