| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 297 | 180 | 207 | 25 |
The foci of the journal are Biomedical engineering, Tissue engineering, Biocompatibility, Chemical engineering and Scaffold. The tackled Biomedical engineering research is interrelated with In vivo which concerns subjects like In vitro. The studies on Tissue engineering discussed can also contribute to research in the domains of Biomaterial, Nanotechnology, Electrospinning, Biophysics and Extracellular matrix.
Topics in Biophysics explored in Biomedical Materials were investigated in conjunction with research in Cell culture and Cell adhesion. While Biocompatibility is the focus of it, it also provided insights into the studies of Chitosan and Composite material. Research on Composite material presented in Biomedical Materials focuses, in particular, on Porosity, Coating and Simulated body fluid.
Biomedical Materials focuses on Chemical engineering but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Scanning electron microscope, Composite number, Polymer chemistry and Polymer. Research on Mesenchymal stem cell presented in Biomedical Materials concerns the broader topic of Cell biology. The in-depth study on Bone regeneration also explores topics in the intersecting field of Bone tissue.
The most cited articles investigate areas of study like Biomedical engineering, Tissue engineering, Composite material, Nanotechnology and Biocompatibility. Scaffold is a focus of the presented Biomedical engineering works in the most cited articles and they dives deep in Scaffold. While the primary focus in the published papers is Tissue engineering, they also dissect topics surrounding Self-healing hydrogels and Drug delivery as a whole.
The journal mostly deals with topics like Biomedical engineering, Biocompatibility, Tissue engineering, Scaffold and Regeneration (biology). Topics in Biomedical engineering were tackled in line with various other fields like Wound healing, Osseointegration and Cartilage. The study of Biocompatibility encompasses disciplines such as In vivo, as well as fields such as In vitro and Pharmacology, all of which overlap with one another.
Biomedical Materials explores topics in Tissue engineering which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Adhesion, Biophysics, Self-healing hydrogels and Gelatin. The research on Scaffold tackled can also make contributions to studies in the areas of Nanofiber, Matrix (biology) and Hyaluronic acid. While it focused on Chemical engineering, it was also able to explore topics like Ultimate tensile strength, Composite number and Microstructure.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Biomedical Materials (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Biomedical Materials (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 4.33% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 18.10% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 7.69% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 13.57% of all publications and 60.63% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Themis R Kyriakides;Arindam Raj;Tiffany H Tseng;Hugh Xiao
(2021)Giulia Molino;Maria Chiara Palmieri;Giorgia Montalbano;Sonia Fiorilli
(2020)Maryam Farokhi;Mina Aleemardani;Atefeh Solouk;Hamid Mirzadeh
(2021)Mohamed Khalaf Ahmed;S F Mansour;Reem Al-Wafi
(2021)Ya Li;Xiaonan Wang;Yuanyuan Han;Hung-Yu Sun;Hung-Yu Sun
(2021)Duarte Nuno Carvalho;Rita López-Cebral;Rita O Sousa;Ana L Alves
(2020)Deboki Naskar;Deboki Naskar;Sunaina Sapru;Sunaina Sapru;Ananta K Ghosh;Rui L Reis
(2021)Elizabeth Norris;Carolina Ramos-Rivera;Gowsihan Poologasundarampillai;Joshua P Clark
(2020)Gina Prado-Prone;Phaedra Silva-Bermudez;Masoomeh Bazzar;Masoomeh Bazzar;Maria Letizia Focarete
(2020)Exploring Materials Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those looking to combine technical expertise with creative skills, programs like photography programs online for veterans offer flexible learning options tailored to diverse backgrounds.
Introverts often seek careers that allow for focused work and high earning potential. If you identify with this, discovering high paying careers for introverts can provide valuable guidance on aligning your personality with material science-related fields or other less extroverted roles.
For those interested in healthcare and human development, understanding the child life specialist salary highlights the viability of specialized allied health roles, which sometimes intersect with materials science in medical device research and development.
Additionally, professionals in nursing might consider further advancement through bsn to msn programs, illustrating how online degrees can support career growth while maintaining flexibility—an important factor for working students in all sciences.